bump-version
Skill100 starsChanged 36 days agoMITView on GitHub
Bump WebUI to an input release version, run the full gate, and prepare a release PR with bucketed changes since the previous v-prefixed tag.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 37 edited versions we read keep these.
7
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 8
Use this skill when preparing a WebUI release version bump PR.
- Very specific: line 12
Ask for the release version if the user did not provide one.
- Very specific: line 18
Use v<version> only when comparing or creating Git tags.
- Very specific: line 37
Make sure the working branch is not main.
- Distinctive: line 44
Run the version bump:
- Distinctive: line 50
Run the full quality gate and fix any failures:
- Distinctive: line 62
Stop if no previous tag is found.
- Distinctive: line 71
Commit the version bump with an imperative message:
- Distinctive: line 87
Use these buckets, omitting empty buckets:
- Distinctive: line 96
Prefer concise, user-facing summaries over raw commit subjects.
- Very specific: line 104
Use the PR author's GitHub login as the contributor, not the commit author or a co-author.
- Very specific: line 106
Do not include commit SHAs in the PR release notes.
- Distinctive: line 140
Remove empty buckets before opening or updating the PR.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 37 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Bump Version Release PR
Use this skill when preparing a WebUI release version bump PR.
Inputs
Ask for the release version if the user did not provide one. The input must be the bare semver version, without a leading v:
0.0.16Use v<version> only when comparing or creating Git tags.
Hotfix releases use the repository hotfix command instead of the stable release PR workflow:
cargo xtask hotfix <commit> <oldest-tag> [--dry-run] [--support-commit <commit>]<oldest-tag> may be written with or without the leading v. The command
increments the -hotfix.<number> suffix independently for every stable release
tag in range, creates each branch as hotfix/v<version>, and pushes it to queue
the guarded Azure release pipeline. Run with --dry-run first when preparing
more than one release line. Use --support-commit when an older release line
needs a newer revision of the hotfix tooling than the commit that originally
introduced it.
Workflow
- Make sure the working branch is not
main. If needed, create a release branch named<user>/bump-v<version>. Fetch tags so the release range is current:
git fetch --tags --quietRun the version bump:
cargo xtask version <version>Run the full quality gate and fix any failures:
cargo xtask checkFind the previous release tag. WebUI release tags are prefixed with
v:previous_tag=$(git tag --list 'v[0-9]*' --sort=-v:refname | grep -v "^v<version>$" | head -n 1)Stop if no previous tag is found.
Collect commits from the previous release through the current base commit. Do this before committing the version bump so release notes do not include the bump commit:
git --no-pager log --reverse --format='%s%x09%H' "${previous_tag}..HEAD"- Build the PR release notes by grouping all commits into user-facing buckets and attributing every supporting PR to its contributor.
Commit the version bump with an imperative message:
chore: bump version to <version> Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>Open or update the release PR titled:
chore: bump version to <version>
Release notes bucketing
Use these buckets, omitting empty buckets:
| Bucket | Include |
Features | feat: commits, feature PRs, new user-visible capabilities, demos that showcase new behavior |
Fixes | fix: commits, bug fixes, regressions, correctness fixes |
Docs | docs: commits, documentation-only PRs, policy/issue-template changes, and docs work from mixed PRs |
Maintenance | Release-relevant chores, refactors, dependency or CI changes that do not fit the other buckets |
Prefer concise, user-facing summaries over raw commit subjects. Combine related commits into one bullet when they describe the same release-note item.
For each bullet, include the supporting PR title, number, and contributor handle in parentheses. Put the contributor immediately after the PR reference:
- summary sentence (PR title #number by @contributor).Use the PR author's GitHub login as the contributor, not the commit author or a co-author. When one bullet combines multiple PRs, repeat #number by @contributor for each supporting PR.
Do not include commit SHAs in the PR release notes. If a commit subject already contains a PR number, use it, then use gh to retrieve the PR title and author.login. Otherwise, use gh to inspect the commit or associated PR when possible.
PR body template
## Release
Bumps WebUI to `<version>`.
Previous release tag: `<previous_tag>`
## Changes since `<previous_tag>`
Features:
- <feature summary> (<PR title> #<number> by @<contributor>).
Fixes:
- <fix summary> (<PR title> #<number> by @<contributor>).
Docs:
- <docs summary> (<PR title> #<number> by @<contributor>).
Maintenance:
- <maintenance summary> (<PR title> #<number> by @<contributor>).
## Validation
- `cargo xtask check`Remove empty buckets before opening or updating the PR.
Example style
Features:
- parser comment policy strips template/style comments while preserving legal comments, with CLI, Node, docs, and benchmark coverage (feat: strip template and style comments in parser and support legal comments #326 by @mohamedmansour).
- CSS module delivery now emits import-map data URI modules and the commerce demo defaults to module styles (Emit style modules via importmap + dataURI instead of <style type="module"> #325 by @KurtCattiSchmidt, Switch default styles to module for commerce demo #327 by @KurtCattiSchmidt).
Fixes:
- repeat-scope event arguments hydrate correctly for framework bindings, including strict argument handling (Fix event handler args in repeat scopes #317 by @jibin7jose, fix: hydrate strict event arguments in repeat scopes #322 by @mohamedmansour).
- client binding lifecycle ordering preserves child updates across conditional and repeated DOM paths (fix: initialize child bindings before connection #329 by @mohamedmansour).
- compiled templates preserve raw style text instead of altering author-provided CSS content (fix: preserve raw style text in compiled templates #330 by @mohamedmansour).
Docs:
- issue forms, contribution/support policy, framework rendering docs, CLI docs, and integration guides were refreshed (chore: clarify contribution and support policy #321 by @mohamedmansour, chore: add GitHub issue forms #328 by @mohamedmansour, plus docs in fix: hydrate strict event arguments in repeat scopes #322 by @mohamedmansour/Emit style modules via importmap + dataURI instead of <style type="module"> #325 by @KurtCattiSchmidt/feat: strip template and style comments in parser and support legal comments #326 by @mohamedmansour/fix: initialize child bindings before connection #329 by @mohamedmansour).Other versions40 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 40
- iOfficeAI/AionUi★ 34ksame name
- Skyvern-AI/skyvern★ 23ksame name
- humanlayer/humanlayer★ 12ksame name
- modelcontextprotocol/csharp-sdk★ 4.6ksame name
- cuthbertLab/music21★ 2.6ksame name
- wandb/weave★ 1.1ksame name
- wesbos/JSON-Alexander★ 944same name
- opentabs-dev/opentabs★ 926same name
- ai-dynamo/aiperf★ 791same name
- use-novamira/novamira★ 729same name
30 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use oss-pr, pr-automation and 6 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
CES-LtdSkilloss-pr
Use when creating a pull request, after committing changes, or when user invokes /oss-pr. Covers branch management, quality checks, commit, push, and PR creation.
Also in 3 projects that use this
CES-LtdSkillpr-automation
PR Automation Orchestrator: poll open PRs, check CI, run review, fix, and merge eligible PRs. Use when: (1) Invoked by daemon via scripts/pr-automation.sh, (2) User says "/pr-automation".
Also in 3 projects that use this
volovelySkillpr-fix
This skill should be used when the user asks to "fix PR comments", "address PR feedback", "resolve PR comments", provides a GitHub PR URL with intent to fix, or says "pr-fix". It reads all review comments on a PR, decides which need code fixes vs. replies, makes the fixes, and posts replies — all with explicit user approval before any GitHub action.
Also in 3 projects that use this
lbednerSkilli18n
Use when a code or template change introduces a new translation message key, in either the framework CLI (aegis/i18n/locales/) or a generated project's CLI (the app/i18n/locales/ template tree). Covers adding the real English string, stubbing the same key into every other locale for parity, and the separate translation PR that later replaces placeholders with reviewed native text.
Also in 4 projects that use this
AnthropicSkillarchitecture
Create or evaluate an architecture decision record (ADR). Use when choosing between technologies (e.g., Kafka vs SQS), documenting a design decision with trade-offs and consequences, reviewing a system design proposal, or designing a new component from requirements and constraints.
Also in 4 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillpr-review
Verify the technical accuracy of a vscode-docs pull request against the VS Code source code in microsoft/vscode. Use when reviewing a docs PR for factual correctness: setting names, command IDs, default values, API shapes, keybindings, versioned availability, and described behavior.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +2 more from CES-Ltd
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- webui-referenceSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- create-exampleSkill
- diagnosticsSkill
- docs-syncSkill
- perfSkill
- prSkill
- quality-gateSkill
- testingSkill
- webui-devSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

