vulcan
CLAUDE.md6 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Guidance for Claude Code (claude.ai/code) working in this repository. VULCAN generates multi-turn tool-calling training data from API specifications. It simulates the software a tool catalog describes entirely in memory, builds a dependency graph over the tools, drives conversations against that live environment, judges them, and emits training records. Public release of a codebase developed internally against a single hosted model endpoint, accompanying VULCAN: Where Agents Learn by Living in Simulated Tool Environments (DATA-FM @ ICLR 2026, <https://openreview.net/forum?id=Ht4HB4pIQq>). The paper's experiments…
- Reads credentials
- Installs packages
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- build-tool-graphSkill
- generate-training-dataSkill
- run-vulcanSkill
- simulate-environmentSkill
The file
We split this CLAUDE.md into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 18
Write the name as VULCAN in prose and vulcan for the package, CLI, config keys and paths.
- Very specific: line 134
When editing them: the model does the judging, the script only reports facts.
- Distinctive: line 145
Do not "fix" this with a partial sandbox that implies a guarantee it cannot make.
- Very specific: line 183
After any rename: diff against the previous tree and read every changed line in vulcan/llm/.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 26,980 CLAUDE.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
CLAUDE.md
Guidance for Claude Code (claude.ai/code) working in this repository.
What this is
VULCAN generates multi-turn tool-calling training data from API specifications. It simulates the software a tool catalog describes entirely in memory, builds a dependency graph over the tools, drives conversations against that live environment, judges them, and emits training records.
Public release of a codebase developed internally against a single hosted model endpoint, accompanying VULCAN: Where Agents Learn by Living in Simulated Tool Environments (DATA-FM @ ICLR 2026, https://openreview.net/forum?id=Ht4HB4pIQq). The paper's experiments used internal endpoints and an internal catalog; neither ships here, and there is no evaluation or fine-tuning code. Do not add claims about benchmark results to the docs.
Write the name as VULCAN in prose and vulcan for the package, CLI, config keys and
paths. Vulcan is wrong. VulcanError is an identifier and stays as it is.
Commands
pip install -e ".[openai]" # or [anthropic], [gemini], [all], [dev]
vulcan --list-steps
vulcan --env quickstart --pipeline # full run, bundled data
vulcan --env quickstart --stage generate_tools # one step
vulcan --env quickstart --pipeline --start generate_trajectories --end judge_trajectories
pytest # 596 tests, ~1s, no network, no API key
pytest tests/test_llm.py -q # provider layer onlyvulcan and python -m vulcan.cli are equivalent. There are no shell run-scripts.
Layout
vulcan/llm/ provider adapters behind one interface
vulcan/core/ runner, stage runner, agent, code exec, parsers
vulcan/steps/ the 15 pipeline steps, grouped by phase
vulcan/prompts/ one module per step
vulcan/config/ packaged base.yaml and example configs
vulcan/environment/ EnvironmentConfig, environment types
vulcan/validators/ deterministic per-step output validation
configs/ user configs: quickstart, hotel_policy
examples/ three input catalogs, 31 tools
docs/ reference pages, verified against the code
.claude/skills/ four agent skills for driving a run
tests/ 596 testsArchitecture
Two facts explain most of the codebase.
1. Every LLM call goes through one method. LLMClient.call() in vulcan/llm/base.py
returns a normalised OpenAI-shaped response (choices[0].message.{content,
reasoning_content, tool_calls}, usage.{prompt,completion,total}_tokens) whatever the
provider. Four adapters translate to and from that shape: openai_client.py,
anthropic_client.py, gemini_client.py, openai_compatible.py (vLLM, SGLang, Ollama,
llama.cpp, TGI — how open-weight models are served).
- No pipeline step may branch on provider. Provider-specific behaviour belongs in an
adapter or in
capabilities.py, never insteps/. - Tool calls are always normalised to OpenAI form with
argumentsas a JSON string, even for providers that return objects, and ids must be non-empty —reconstruct.pymapstool_call_idback to a tool name when building records. capabilities.pydecides per model whether to sendmax_completion_tokens, whethertemperatureis accepted, whether reasoning text comes back, and (Anthropic) adaptive vs fixed-budget thinking. Add a model family there, not at a call site.
2. Fifteen registered steps, dispatched by a runner that owns ordering. Steps subclass
BaseStep (vulcan/steps/base.py), register with @register_step, and implement
async run(item, progress). core/stage_runner.py holds PIPELINE_ORDER and
_STANDARD_INPUT — that is the authoritative input resolution. Steps do not describe
their own predecessors.
1 normalize_specs env_simulation spec repair, missing response schemas
2 generate_tools env_simulation one Python Tool class per API
3 verify_tools env_simulation verify → fix → re-verify
4 assemble_environment env_simulation merge into one stateful class
5 debug_environment env_simulation generate tests, run, repair
6 generate_states env_simulation initial states; the only data diversity
7 sample_arguments env_simulation per-tool argument bank
8 build_graph graph_construction explicit/implicit edges over tool pairs
9 plan_sequences graph_construction subgraphs → sequences (deterministic)
10 score_sequences graph_construction deprecated, analysis only
11 execute_sequences task_generation run chains against the environment
12 generate_queries task_generation chains → natural-language queries
13 generate_trajectories trajectory conversation against the live environment
14 judge_trajectories trajectory model-as-judge
15 export_dataset output filter and formatenv_grouped/success.jsonl is written by StageRunner._build_env_grouped after
verify_tools and is not a registered step. Both assemble_environment and
build_graph read it.
Four private modules under steps/ are live and imported by plan_sequences and
generate_trajectories: _subgraph_extractor, _sequence_builder, _multipath_extractor,
_tool_call_parser. There are no others; six unreachable ones were deleted.
Configuration
Two layers, deep-merged: packaged vulcan/config/base.yaml, then the per-environment file.
Precedence steps.<step> > defaults > base.yaml. load_config resolves a name as an
explicit path → ./configs/<name>.yaml → the packaged config dir.
- Never set
defaults.model. A step resolvessteps.<step>.model→defaults.model→"", and empty means "use the model this stage's client was built with". Setting it overridesllm.modelfor every stage, which in a mixed-provider config sends one vendor's model name to another. Same reason no step may hardcode a fallback model id. - The CLI builds a client per stage via
create_client(config, stage), so per-stepprovider/base_url/reasoningtake effect. Clients cache on(provider, model, base_url, reasoning). - API keys come from the environment or
.env, never from a config file.
Skills
Four skills in .claude/skills/, committed so a clone is the install. Each is a written
procedure; the Python helpers beside them are optional cross-checks that settle mechanical
questions exactly, and every skill works without them.
| Skill | Covers |
run-vulcan | the whole pipeline from a conversation; calls the other three, confirms before spending |
simulate-environment | schemas → catalog → steps 1 to 6, then reviews the generated environment |
build-tool-graph | cost estimate, build_graph + plan_sequences, usability check |
generate-training-data | trajectories through export, verifying each stage's output |
When editing them: the model does the judging, the script only reports facts. Do not
rewrite a skill so its value is "run this script". .github/prompts/ mirrors them for
Copilot by pointing at the same files, so keep it thin.
Security model
core/code_exec.py executes model-generated Python in the host process with no sandbox.
That is how environment simulation works, not an oversight: the pipeline asks a model to
write a Tool class and then runs it. Prompt constraints and debug_environment are
correctness measures, not a security boundary.
Do not "fix" this with a partial sandbox that implies a guarantee it cannot make. Keep the README warning and the module docstring in sync.
Conventions
- A stage can report success while every model call failed. Steps catch per-item errors
and emit the row anyway. The honest signal is
llm_calls=in<output_base>/logs/<category>/<step>.log, not row counts. - Runs resume on the item's input hash, so changing a model or temperature does not invalidate completed items. Delete the stage output directory to force regeneration.
build_graphcosts n·(n−1) model calls for n tools. Usually the largest line item in a run; be deliberate before raising tool counts in examples or tests.- Docs under
docs/are verified against the code, not written from memory. Sharp edges live with the stage that has them under a ⚠ marker inpipeline_stages.md, and cross-cutting ones indocs/README.md. Fixing one means deleting the entry, not softening it; deciding the behaviour is correct means recording why, so it is not re-filed. - No hardcoded domain or benchmark names. Nothing may branch on a category name, a tool
name, or a benchmark.
tests/test_no_domain_carveouts.pyfails if one reappears anywhere in the package, including in comments.
Renaming, and why it is dangerous here
Names are expected to say what the thing does — the release renamed all 15 steps to
verb_noun and config keys to state their unit (k_values → turns_per_sequence). But
blanket renames have broken this repo repeatedly, always silently:
- No step may start with
test_. pytest collects anything matching that name, which is why the environment-repair step isdebug_environment. - Never rename a provider's wire format.
thinking,reasoning_content,redacted_thinking,signatureandadaptiveinvulcan/llm/are Anthropic's, vLLM's and Ollama's names, not ours. A repo-wide rename of VULCAN's ownthinkingvocabulary once rewrote them, silently disabling extended thinking on Claude and reasoning on Ollama, with the whole suite green.TestProviderWireFormatintests/test_llm.pyasserts them. - Identifiers compound.
test_environment_type_is_*is not a reference to a step, andVulcanErroris not the product name. A bad substitution can un-collect a test rather than fail it. tests/test_shipped_configs.pyexists because the unit suite once passed while every real run raisedNameError.- After any rename: diff against the previous tree and read every changed line in
vulcan/llm/. Grepping for the new name proves nothing about what the old one was attached to.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

