agentleFS
MicrosoftKnown publishermicrosoft/powerplatform-build-tools/.claude/skills/create-pr/SKILL.md

create-pr

Skill314 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Stage, commit, push, and create GitHub PRs for the current branch — always main, then automatically cherry-picks to release/stable.

  • Reads credentials
  • Commits and pushes

196 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use update-pr, act-on-feedback and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • MicrosoftSkill

    update-pr

    Update the pull request for the current session. Use when the user wants to push new changes to an existing PR.

    Also in 9 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    act-on-feedback

    Act on user feedback attached to the current session. Use when the user submits feedback on the session's changes via the Submit Feedback button.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • ModelEngine-GroupSkill

    create-release-note

    从 PR/commit 中自动生成结构化的 Release Notes,并可选创建 GitHub Draft Release。支持 x.y.0 版本合并前一 minor 系列的 release notes。当用户要求生成发布说明、创建 release notes 时触发。参数为版本号和可选的上一版本号。

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • frostneySkill

    native-nostalgia-stack

    Applies the user's FreePascal toolchain and its build, formatting, hook, and test contracts while leaving project-specific mechanics local. Use when scaffolding or working in a FreePascal project that follows this toolchain.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • frostneySkill

    software-engineering-excellence

    Applies the user's engineering standards during substantial technical work: preserve scope, use current evidence, delegate independent parts, and complete authorized outcomes. Use during substantial implementation, debugging, refactoring, or multi-part delivery work.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • parkchuSkill

    start-mission

    넥스트스텝(NextStep) 미션을 처음 시작할 때, 미션 저장소를 fork·clone하고 최초 작업 브랜치(step1 등)까지 만들어 준다. gh CLI로 fork하고 clone까지 이어서 처리하며, gh가 없거나 인증이 안 돼 있으면 브라우저 Fork 안내로 폴백한다. 이미 fork/clone돼 있으면 재사용하고 이어서 진행한다(재실행 안전). 사용자가 "미션 시작하려는데 저장소 세팅해줘", "새 미션 시작할래", "fork부터 해줘", "/nextstep:start-mission" 등으로 요청할 때 사용한다.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +1 more from microsoft

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 179 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Commit types: fix: feat: chore: build: docs:

    line 26
  2. Very specific:

    Create a release branch off release/stable, cherry-pick all commits from the main branch, push, and open the paired PR.

    line 109
  3. Distinctive:

    After printing both PR URLs, tell the user:

    line 150

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 179 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Create PR

Assumes you are on the right branch with changes ready to commit (or already committed) and npm run ci has passed.

For CLI version bumps use /pac-cli-update — it handles dual PRs (main + release/stable) automatically. For reviewing an existing PR use /review <number>.


Step 1 — Stage and commit (skip if already committed)

Stage files explicitly — never git add .:

git add <specific files>
git status  # confirm nothing accidental staged
git commit -m "<type>: <description>"

Commit types: fix: feat: chore: build: docs:


Step 2 — Push and create the main PR

git push -u origin HEAD 2>&1

Capture the current branch name and the SHA(s) to cherry-pick:

MAIN_BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current)
COMMITS=$(git log origin/main..HEAD --reverse --format="%H")

Pick the template matching what changed:

Dependency update (package.json / package-lock.json only)

gh pr create \
  --base main \
  --title "chore: update dependencies" \
  --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
- <what was updated and why>

## Dependencies updated

| Package | Before | After | Reason |
| ------- | ------ | ----- | ------ |
| ...     | ...    | ...   | ...    |

## Known limitations / follow-ups
- <accepted risks or deferred items>

## Test plan
- [ ] `npm install` clean
- [ ] `npm audit` — no new vulnerabilities introduced
- [ ] `npm run ci` passes (functional tests exempt)

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
EOF
)"

Feature / bug fix (src/ or gulp/ changes)

gh pr create \
  --base main \
  --title "<fix|feat>: <concise description under 70 chars>" \
  --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
- <what changed and why>

## Tasks affected
<!-- List any Azure DevOps tasks whose behaviour changed -->

## Architecture impact
<!-- If any layer boundary changed: task.json input names, bundleDependencies,
     service connection schema, BuildToolsHost/RunnerParams interface -->

## Known limitations / follow-ups
- <anything accepted as risk or deferred>

## Test plan
- [ ] `npm run ci` passes (functional tests exempt)
- [ ] Manual pipeline run on DEV stage (if task behaviour changed)

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
EOF
)"

Capture the main PR number/URL from the output — you'll reference it in the release PR.


Step 3 — Cherry-pick to release/stable

Create a release branch off release/stable, cherry-pick all commits from the main branch, push, and open the paired PR.

RELEASE_BRANCH="${MAIN_BRANCH}-release"

git fetch origin release/stable 2>&1
git checkout -b "$RELEASE_BRANCH" origin/release/stable 2>&1

# Cherry-pick each commit from the main branch (in order)
for SHA in $COMMITS; do
  git cherry-pick "$SHA" 2>&1
done

git push -u origin "$RELEASE_BRANCH" 2>&1

Then open the release PR targeting release/stable:

gh pr create \
  --base release/stable \
  --title "<same title as main PR>" \
  --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary

Cherry-pick of #<main-pr-number> to `release/stable`.

- <one-line description of what changed>

## Paired main PR
#<main-pr-number>

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
EOF
)"

Step 4 — Prompt user to queue the official build

After printing both PR URLs, tell the user:

Both PRs are open for review:
  Main PR:    https://github.com/microsoft/powerplatform-build-tools/pull/<n>
  Release PR: https://github.com/microsoft/powerplatform-build-tools/pull/<m>

Once both are merged, queue the official build to sign and publish the package to the VS Marketplace:
  https://dev.azure.com/dynamicscrm/OneCRM/_build?definitionId=21491

When queuing, set these pipeline variables:
  - GITHUB_TOKEN            GitHub PAT (repo scope, SSO enabled for 'microsoft' org)
  - AZ_DevOps_Read_PAT      PAT to read from the AzDO DPX-Tools-Upstream feed
  - isEsrpEnabled           true
  - PUBLISH_TO_MARKETPLACE  true

When the pipeline succeeds, the build automatically:
  - Pushes a v<version> tag (e.g. v2.0.147) to the repo
  - Signs and publishes the VSIXs to the VS Marketplace
  - Creates a published GitHub Release with all 4 signed VSIXs attached, marked Latest

Verify the release at:
  https://github.com/microsoft/powerplatform-build-tools/releases/tag/v<version>

If no GitHub Release shows up after a successful build, inspect the "Create GitHub release with VSIX assets" task in the ADO build logs — most likely cause is the GITHUB_TOKEN pipeline variable being missing, expired, or lacking `repo` scope / SSO authorization for `microsoft`.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.