agentleFS
MicrosoftKnown publishermicrosoft/glintlabs/skills/analyze-survey-ai-preview/SKILL.md

analyze-survey-ai-preview

Skill2 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Create or rebuild the staged Viva Glint survey report with AI-generated People Science summaries. Use only when the user explicitly asks for the AI summary preview, staging experience, or experimental summarized report.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 6

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Add the staged AI People Science summary experience to the shared analyze-survey report pipeline.

    line 9
  2. Very specific:

    Use a dedicated output directory whose name clearly includes ai-preview.

    line 15
  3. Very specific:

    Never add summaries to a standard analyze-survey output unless the user explicitly asks to convert that output into a preview.

    line 16
  4. Distinctive:

    Keep respondent-level data local and outside the share ZIP.

    line 18
  5. Very specific:

    If no completed analysis exists, follow ../analyze-survey/SKILL.md and run scripts/analyze_survey_export.py with --summary-mode off.

    line 22
  6. Very specific:

    Follow ../analyze-survey/references/interpretation.md to establish QA readiness and apply the interpretation process and guardrails.

    line 24
  7. Very specific:

    Use people-science-knowledge-vault to retrieve relevant externally published article bodies.

    line 28
  8. Distinctive:

    Use the shared report contract and narrative schema rather than maintaining a second summary specification here.

    line 49

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Analyze Survey AI Preview

Add the staged AI People Science summary experience to the shared analyze-survey report pipeline. Do not duplicate the analysis runner, report builder, golden report, schemas, or source index.

Isolation

  • Use a dedicated output directory whose name clearly includes ai-preview.
  • Never add summaries to a standard analyze-survey output unless the user explicitly asks to convert that output into a preview.
  • Keep respondent-level data local and outside the share ZIP.

Workflow

  1. If no completed analysis exists, follow ../analyze-survey/SKILL.md and run scripts/analyze_survey_export.py with --summary-mode off.
  2. Follow ../analyze-survey/references/interpretation.md to establish QA readiness and apply the interpretation process and guardrails.
  3. Inspect people-science-summary-context.json and the AI-summary modes in ../analyze-survey/references/interactive-report-contract.md.
  4. Use people-science-knowledge-vault to retrieve relevant externally published article bodies.
  5. Write people-science-summaries.json using ../analyze-survey/references/people-science-summaries.schema.json. Include all six tabs.
  6. Rebuild the report:
python scripts/build_interactive_report.py \
  --config <output-directory>/_input/analysis-config.json \
  --output-dir <output-directory> \
  --summary-mode required
  1. Confirm all six narrative objects are embedded, the manifest records summary_mode as required, and the share ZIP contains the summary file. Tab-level AI cards remain hidden as specified in the report contract.
  2. Open the HTML report before finishing.

Summary contract

Use the shared report contract and narrative schema rather than maintaining a second summary specification here.

Promotion

This skill is a staging entry point. When the preview is approved, promote the experience by changing the default summary mode in the shared pipeline and folding these orchestration instructions into analyze-survey; do not replace the pipeline with copied code.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.