experiment-catalog-operator
Skill8 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Operate and analyze Experiment Catalog instances from any repository that depends on the catalog. Use when creating projects, experiments, baselines, sets/permutations, metric definitions, tags, or result uploads; comparing experiment results; finding regressions or improvements; analyzing per-ref/ground-truth behavior; calculating statistics; identifying meaningful tags; or explaining catalog data.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
19 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 13 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
13
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Use this skill to operate a running Experiment Catalog and analyze its content.
- Very specific: line 19
Use references/operations.md for project, experiment, baseline, metric, tag, and result workflows.
- Very specific: line 20
Use references/analysis.md for comparison, per-ref diagnosis, p-values, meaningful tags, and final summaries.
- Very specific: line 21
Use references/api-and-mcp.md for exact MCP tool names, REST endpoints, request shapes, and response fields.
- Very specific: line 22
Use references/downstream-integration.md when adapting another repo to publish results into the catalog.
- Distinctive: line 31
Do not invent project, experiment, baseline, auth, or storage settings.
- Very specific: line 56
Use CompareExperiment for normal "which set/permutation is better?" questions.
- Very specific: line 57
Use CompareByRef only for individual ground-truth/ref improvement or regression questions.
- Very specific: line 58
Use GetNamedSet only when raw iteration-level details are needed.
- Very specific: line 59
Use MeaningfulTags when the user asks which subsets explain a metric change.
- Very specific: line 60
Use CalculateStatistics before claiming statistical significance if p-values are missing.
- Very specific: line 61
Use REST POST /results for bulk or scripted ingestion because MCP does not expose result upload in the current catalog tools.
- Very specific: line 66
Use a metric definition's optional description when explaining unfamiliar metrics or presenting metric choices.
- Very specific: line 68
Prefer normalized values when comparing metrics with min/max.
- Distinctive: line 69
Treat missing metrics as evidence to investigate, not as zero.
- Very specific: line 72
Do not call a change statistically significant unless p_value supports it or statistics have been calculated.
- Distinctive: line 79
Never expose storage connection strings, bearer tokens, or OIDC secrets.
- Distinctive: line 80
Keep result uploads idempotent from the caller's perspective: stable project, experiment, set, ref, metrics, and source URIs.
- Distinctive: line 81
If optimization returns conflict or ingestion fails during maintenance, surface the conflict and retry only when the user asks or the …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Experiment Catalog Operator
Use this skill to operate a running Experiment Catalog and analyze its content. Prefer MCP tools when available; use REST when MCP is unavailable or the task is bulk ingestion.
What To Load
- Use
references/operations.mdfor project, experiment, baseline, metric, tag, and result workflows. - Use
references/analysis.mdfor comparison, per-ref diagnosis, p-values, meaningful tags, and final summaries. - Use
references/api-and-mcp.mdfor exact MCP tool names, REST endpoints, request shapes, and response fields. - Use
references/downstream-integration.mdwhen adapting another repo to publish results into the catalog.
Inputs To Discover
- Catalog access: MCP tool namespace or API base URL, usually
http://localhost:6010/api. - Auth mode: anonymous, bearer token, cookie/header token, or reverse-proxy auth.
- Target names:
project,experiment,set/permutation, metric names, tag names. - User intent: operate data, ingest results, compare sets, investigate refs, or write an experiment summary.
Do not invent project, experiment, baseline, auth, or storage settings. Ask when they materially affect writes.
Vocabulary
| Term | Meaning |
| Project | Fixed evaluation environment, often a sprint or milestone. |
| Experiment | Hypothesis-driven test inside a project. |
| Set | One evaluation run/permutation/configuration variant. |
| Result | Metrics for one ref iteration. |
| Ref | Ground-truth identifier used for aggregation and per-item comparison. |
| Baseline | Reference measurement for project or experiment comparison. |
Translate "ground truth" to ref in catalog operations.
Default Workflow
- Identify the target catalog and access method.
- Inspect existing project/experiment state only as needed.
- For writes, create or verify the project, experiment, baseline, metric definitions, and tags before result upload.
- For comparison, call aggregate comparison first; only drill into refs or raw set results when the question requires it.
- For summaries, report high-priority metric deltas, p-values/confidence when present, important regressions, meaningful tags, and decision guidance.
Tool Selection Rules
- Use
CompareExperimentfor normal "which set/permutation is better?" questions. Do not callListSetsForExperimentjust to validate a set first. - Use
CompareByRefonly for individual ground-truth/ref improvement or regression questions. - Use
GetNamedSetonly when raw iteration-level details are needed. - Use
MeaningfulTagswhen the user asks which subsets explain a metric change. - Use
CalculateStatisticsbefore claiming statistical significance if p-values are missing. - Use REST
POST /resultsfor bulk or scripted ingestion because MCP does not expose result upload in the current catalog tools.
Analysis Rules
- Prioritize metrics marked
is_important. - Use a metric definition's optional
descriptionwhen explaining unfamiliar metrics or presenting metric choices. - Respect metric direction. Tags such as
lower-is-bettermean a lower value is an improvement. - Prefer
normalizedvalues when comparing metrics withmin/max; otherwise comparevalue. - Treat missing metrics as evidence to investigate, not as zero.
- Report sample size (
count, result counts) next to conclusions. - Separate overall aggregate findings from subset/tag/ref findings.
- Do not call a change statistically significant unless
p_valuesupports it or statistics have been calculated. - Runtime custom aggregate metrics can appear in aggregate, per-ref, and meaningful-tag responses. They are recalculated from filtered raw results and currently have no persisted statistics.
- In aggregate comparisons, report
winsas the number of shared refs where the set's per-ref aggregate beats the experiment baseline andtiesas exact equality. Respectlower-is-better; otherwise higher values win.
Safety Rules
- Writes are persistent. Confirm destructive or broad writes, large uploads, and baseline changes unless explicitly requested.
- Never expose storage connection strings, bearer tokens, or OIDC secrets.
- Keep result uploads idempotent from the caller's perspective: stable project, experiment, set, ref, metrics, and source URIs.
- If optimization returns conflict or ingestion fails during maintenance, surface the conflict and retry only when the user asks or the caller has retry policy.
Versioning
This skill uses metadata.catalog_skill_version with SemVer.
MAJOR: breaking workflow, API, or response-interpretation changes.MINOR: new catalog feature coverage or new analysis workflows.PATCH: corrections, clarifications, or endpoint/tool updates.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

