agentleFS
MicrosoftKnown publishermicrosoft/experiment-catalog/.agents/skills/experiment-catalog-operator/SKILL.md

experiment-catalog-operator

Skill8 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Operate and analyze Experiment Catalog instances from any repository that depends on the catalog. Use when creating projects, experiments, baselines, sets/permutations, metric definitions, tags, or result uploads; comparing experiment results; finding regressions or improvements; analyzing per-ref/ground-truth behavior; calculating statistics; identifying meaningful tags; or explaining catalog data.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

19 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 13 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈6

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 13

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill to operate a running Experiment Catalog and analyze its content.

    line 15
  2. Very specific:

    Use references/operations.md for project, experiment, baseline, metric, tag, and result workflows.

    line 19
  3. Very specific:

    Use references/analysis.md for comparison, per-ref diagnosis, p-values, meaningful tags, and final summaries.

    line 20
  4. Very specific:

    Use references/api-and-mcp.md for exact MCP tool names, REST endpoints, request shapes, and response fields.

    line 21
  5. Very specific:

    Use references/downstream-integration.md when adapting another repo to publish results into the catalog.

    line 22
  6. Distinctive:

    Do not invent project, experiment, baseline, auth, or storage settings.

    line 31
  7. Very specific:

    Use CompareExperiment for normal "which set/permutation is better?" questions.

    line 56
  8. Very specific:

    Use CompareByRef only for individual ground-truth/ref improvement or regression questions.

    line 57
  9. Very specific:

    Use GetNamedSet only when raw iteration-level details are needed.

    line 58
  10. Very specific:

    Use MeaningfulTags when the user asks which subsets explain a metric change.

    line 59
  11. Very specific:

    Use CalculateStatistics before claiming statistical significance if p-values are missing.

    line 60
  12. Very specific:

    Use REST POST /results for bulk or scripted ingestion because MCP does not expose result upload in the current catalog tools.

    line 61
  13. Very specific:

    Use a metric definition's optional description when explaining unfamiliar metrics or presenting metric choices.

    line 66
  14. Very specific:

    Prefer normalized values when comparing metrics with min/max.

    line 68
  15. Distinctive:

    Treat missing metrics as evidence to investigate, not as zero.

    line 69
  16. Very specific:

    Do not call a change statistically significant unless p_value supports it or statistics have been calculated.

    line 72
  17. Distinctive:

    Never expose storage connection strings, bearer tokens, or OIDC secrets.

    line 79
  18. Distinctive:

    Keep result uploads idempotent from the caller's perspective: stable project, experiment, set, ref, metrics, and source URIs.

    line 80
  19. Distinctive:

    If optimization returns conflict or ingestion fails during maintenance, surface the conflict and retry only when the user asks or the …

    line 81

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Experiment Catalog Operator

Use this skill to operate a running Experiment Catalog and analyze its content. Prefer MCP tools when available; use REST when MCP is unavailable or the task is bulk ingestion.

What To Load

  • Use references/operations.md for project, experiment, baseline, metric, tag, and result workflows.
  • Use references/analysis.md for comparison, per-ref diagnosis, p-values, meaningful tags, and final summaries.
  • Use references/api-and-mcp.md for exact MCP tool names, REST endpoints, request shapes, and response fields.
  • Use references/downstream-integration.md when adapting another repo to publish results into the catalog.

Inputs To Discover

  • Catalog access: MCP tool namespace or API base URL, usually http://localhost:6010/api.
  • Auth mode: anonymous, bearer token, cookie/header token, or reverse-proxy auth.
  • Target names: project, experiment, set/permutation, metric names, tag names.
  • User intent: operate data, ingest results, compare sets, investigate refs, or write an experiment summary.

Do not invent project, experiment, baseline, auth, or storage settings. Ask when they materially affect writes.

Vocabulary

TermMeaning
ProjectFixed evaluation environment, often a sprint or milestone.
ExperimentHypothesis-driven test inside a project.
SetOne evaluation run/permutation/configuration variant.
ResultMetrics for one ref iteration.
RefGround-truth identifier used for aggregation and per-item comparison.
BaselineReference measurement for project or experiment comparison.

Translate "ground truth" to ref in catalog operations.

Default Workflow

  1. Identify the target catalog and access method.
  2. Inspect existing project/experiment state only as needed.
  3. For writes, create or verify the project, experiment, baseline, metric definitions, and tags before result upload.
  4. For comparison, call aggregate comparison first; only drill into refs or raw set results when the question requires it.
  5. For summaries, report high-priority metric deltas, p-values/confidence when present, important regressions, meaningful tags, and decision guidance.

Tool Selection Rules

  • Use CompareExperiment for normal "which set/permutation is better?" questions. Do not call ListSetsForExperiment just to validate a set first.
  • Use CompareByRef only for individual ground-truth/ref improvement or regression questions.
  • Use GetNamedSet only when raw iteration-level details are needed.
  • Use MeaningfulTags when the user asks which subsets explain a metric change.
  • Use CalculateStatistics before claiming statistical significance if p-values are missing.
  • Use REST POST /results for bulk or scripted ingestion because MCP does not expose result upload in the current catalog tools.

Analysis Rules

  • Prioritize metrics marked is_important.
  • Use a metric definition's optional description when explaining unfamiliar metrics or presenting metric choices.
  • Respect metric direction. Tags such as lower-is-better mean a lower value is an improvement.
  • Prefer normalized values when comparing metrics with min/max; otherwise compare value.
  • Treat missing metrics as evidence to investigate, not as zero.
  • Report sample size (count, result counts) next to conclusions.
  • Separate overall aggregate findings from subset/tag/ref findings.
  • Do not call a change statistically significant unless p_value supports it or statistics have been calculated.
  • Runtime custom aggregate metrics can appear in aggregate, per-ref, and meaningful-tag responses. They are recalculated from filtered raw results and currently have no persisted statistics.
  • In aggregate comparisons, report wins as the number of shared refs where the set's per-ref aggregate beats the experiment baseline and ties as exact equality. Respect lower-is-better; otherwise higher values win.

Safety Rules

  • Writes are persistent. Confirm destructive or broad writes, large uploads, and baseline changes unless explicitly requested.
  • Never expose storage connection strings, bearer tokens, or OIDC secrets.
  • Keep result uploads idempotent from the caller's perspective: stable project, experiment, set, ref, metrics, and source URIs.
  • If optimization returns conflict or ingestion fails during maintenance, surface the conflict and retry only when the user asks or the caller has retry policy.

Versioning

This skill uses metadata.catalog_skill_version with SemVer.

  • MAJOR: breaking workflow, API, or response-interpretation changes.
  • MINOR: new catalog feature coverage or new analysis workflows.
  • PATCH: corrections, clarifications, or endpoint/tool updates.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.