coordinate-work
Skill5 starsChanged 5 days agoMITView on GitHub
Commission independent goal-driven workers, review their results, and resolve real blockers through Unified's authenticated coordination controls.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- curvedinf/dev-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- curvedinf/dev-skills★ 7same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- amplifier-shellSkill
- appearance-authoringSkill
- unified-appSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
14 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 9 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
9
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Use one manager for many independent workers when the objective permits.
- Very specific: line 17
Use app_control to discover only the action prefixes needed for the next operation.
- Very specific: line 22
Read coordination.context once for the current root and task intent.
- Very specific: line 35
Use coordination.create for durable independent task roots.
- Distinctive: line 47
Default creation still inherits the manager's folder, useful for read-only work.
- Very specific: line 57
Use coordination.send with returnNotification:true for a new follow-up that needs a result, retaining its stable command ID and exact …
- Distinctive: line 77
Do not hunt for a human message ID merely because work is dependency-blocked.
- Very specific: line 79
Use the human-backed resume recipe in the reference only for an actual stopped, paused or failed commissioned member.
- Very specific: line 115
Read the exact coordination.result and needed artifacts.
- Very specific: line 121
Use passive coordination.artifact for bounded inspection.
- Distinctive: line 127
Verify returned size/hash and provenance.
- Very specific: line 130
When a completed review unblocks another manager and you continue unrelated work, send that decision now through coordination.send in auto …
- Very specific: line 137
After accepting a member's exact contribution, use assignment.task.read then assignment.task.complete with current revisions and completion …
- Distinctive: line 140
Use the available result acknowledgement and membership-retirement controls when appropriate.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Coordinate work
Use one manager for many independent workers when the objective permits. The manager chooses priorities, assigns deliverables, reviews results and integrates accepted changes. Each worker owns implementation, ordinary corrections, focused isolated validation and a reviewable result or PR. A higher-level manager can coordinate other managers in the same way. Do not impose a one-worker-at-a-time pattern or create another status board simply to manage the existing tasks.
Start with current facts
Use app_control to discover only the action prefixes needed for the next
operation. Follow nextOffset and, when present, schemaRead/nextSchemaOffset
to obtain the complete schema. Retain it during this task; do not repeatedly
list every action. Never emulate missing capabilities by editing host databases.
Read coordination.context once for the current root and task intent. Follow
assignment.briefRef for the current member summary before reading individual
histories. Read an exact result or artifact for a decision; load history only
when it answers a specific unresolved question. A brief or old scratch note is
not current acceptance evidence or new authority.
Commission useful independent deliverables
- Break the objective into enough independent tasks to make useful progress in parallel. Give each worker the deliverable, acceptance criteria, scope, dependencies, existing authority and result destination. Keep genuinely sequential dependencies explicit; use real machine/provider capacity and any deliberately configured limits, not an invented fixed worker count.
- Use
coordination.createfor durable independent task roots. Itstextis the complete brief, including acceptance and permission limits; there is no separateacceptancefield. Supplyobjectiveto save its durable goal; optionalconstraintsbelong to that objective. Creation reserves its result notification before the worker runs. Keep the returned request identity instead of creating a second worker after a slow or lost response. - For a new independent source writer, use
worktree.inspectwithmode:"clean"and an optionalref, then includeexecution: {kind:"worktree", expectedCommit}and the relevantrepositoryPathwhen commissioning. The host prepares a clean committed checkout without scanning unrelated local changes, and saves the objective before the first working turn.expectedCommitis the returned full Git commit ID;sourceRevisionis a different, legacy working-folder snapshot digest. No setup-only model turn or manager handoff exchange is needed. The receipt'scheckoutId,objectiveTaskIdand finalworkingDirectoryidentify the result. Default creation still inherits the manager's folder, useful for read-only work; it does not isolate source, ports or test state. Existing workers keep the explicit placement/recovery controls in the reference. - Let workers complete their assigned objective. Routine repair, cheap preflight and focused tests are included; do not require a new disposition after each failed check or add fixed attempt/turn/review allowances. Reuse maintained project checks and managed test profiles. Reuse passing evidence when the relevant inputs match, rerunning affected checks when those inputs change. Change approach when repeated failures make no progress.
Use coordination.send with returnNotification:true for a new follow-up that
needs a result, retaining its stable command ID and exact target. Omitted mode
uses ordinary busy-boundary/idle delivery. notify is a non-waking note; use it
only when no continuation is needed. Ordinary collaboration within the assigned
intent needs no separate approval. Do not enroll independent chats implicitly.
Continue when a dependency is resolved
For an active task changing its own runtime through configuration.apply with
whenIdle:true, the host saves the wait, yields the current execution, verifies
the change and continues the same task. Do not add task.block, a message to
yourself or polling to arrange that continuation. An uncertain outcome still
belongs to the original configuration operation; inspect that receipt before
deciding on recovery. This does not start idle work or resume a deliberate Stop.
For an agent-recorded dependency block, send the new finding to the existing
owner through ordinary coordination.send in auto or queue mode, without
resume. The host admits this fresh input while keeping the task blocked.
The owner verifies the dependency, then deliberately calls task.resume within
its standing scope. No current humanInput or fresh human approval is needed.
Do not hunt for a human message ID merely because work is dependency-blocked.
Use the human-backed resume recipe in the reference only for an actual stopped,
paused or failed commissioned member. Unknown block provenance, unresolved user
questions and uncertain effects do not become resolved dependencies. Preserve
the same task, used budget, evidence and actual Stop boundaries.
Return a result or a real blocker
Workers normally report at completion, or when another owner/user must resolve a concrete blocker. Do not send routine acknowledgements and progress summaries back and forth. A test waiting for capacity blocks that dependency, not unrelated implementation. Use the host's saved result notification instead of polling or adding a second watch for the same work.
Declare one concise coordination.reply for the actual delivered requestId,
with typed outcome, source/PR identity, affected checks, limitations and evidence
references. Omit messageIds unless you know your assistant output IDs from the
current generation. Never use the incoming peer request's messageId. The host
seals the declaration against actual root completion; a reply is not independent
review or proof that an unknown effect succeeded.
Retain a local file using path@sha256:<64 lowercase hex digits>, relative to
your actual execution folder. For a file containing exactly hello, use:
report.txt@sha256:2cf24dba5fb0a30e26e83b2ac5b9e29e1b161e5c1fa7425e73043362938b9824Retention happens before acknowledgement. Verify artifactVerification: verified
and each requested file's artifacts[].status: retained before claiming preserved
evidence. A plain path or digest in prose does not retain bytes. For failed
retention, later corrections, cross-workspace discovery, adoption, Stop/resume,
shared task claims or unknown outcomes, read the relevant section of the
protocol reference only when needed.
Review and close without another worker turn
Read the exact coordination.result and needed artifacts. Review the changed
risk against the original acceptance; a fresh broad test census is not required
merely because a different manager received the result. A failed focused check
needs correction, not a new approval to repair it. Send one concrete correction
request to the same owner when necessary; preserve earlier failed evidence.
Use passive coordination.artifact for bounded inspection. To consume the actual
file, discover coordination.artifact.save and supply your sessionId, the exact
requestId, responseRevision and reference, plus a relative destination path
inside your current working folder. Its parent must exist. The host streams and
verifies large binary files without credentials or peer-library access. Current
write restrictions still apply; different existing bytes are never overwritten.
Verify returned size/hash and provenance. After an uncertain return, inspect the
destination before another explicit save; saved bytes are not test qualification.
When a completed review unblocks another manager and you continue unrelated
work, send that decision now through coordination.send in auto mode. Reference
the exact reviewed source and evidence, optionally linking the incoming request
with replyToRequestId. Do not wait for your whole turn to end. This attributed
handoff does not seal a staged result or grant new authority; the recipient still
applies its acceptance criteria and standing scope.
After accepting a member's exact contribution, use assignment.task.read then
assignment.task.complete with current revisions and completion evidence. The
worker does not need another model turn to acknowledge acceptance or shipment.
Use the available result acknowledgement and membership-retirement controls when
appropriate. Unresolved resource custody remains separate; don't call an incident
resolved merely because its diagnostic task completed.
Keep shared context small and current
SCRATCH.md is a short current context/index, not a second task database or an
append-only journal. Workers keep detail with their tasks. Managers promote only
shared decisions and unresolved dependencies with owners and links. Put durable
conventions in AGENTS.md; put useful superseded history outside automatically
loaded context. Do not paste complete receipts, transcripts, release histories
or old directives into scratch, and do not include whole archives automatically.
Reread before editing and preserve other owners' changes and unfinished work.
Scratch text never grants authority, completes a task or settles an unknown effect.
Actual Stop, explicit user limits, permissions, questions requiring user choice, execution ownership and uncertain prior effects still govern. Read saved receipts after uncertain responses; never replay mutations to obtain a cleaner result or retry through another identity. Ask for a missing decision or authority, not for permission to make an ordinary engineering choice already inside the objective.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

