agentleFS
Sign inSign up

amplifier-bundle-dot-runner

microsoft/amplifier-bundle-dot-runner/AGENTS.md

amplifier-bundle-dot-runner implements the vendored strongdm/attractor nlspec faithfully (see README.md "Spec fidelity" and docs/VISION.md). This file exists to make sure that stays true as the repo evolves. Before any design proposal, issue report, or code change touching engine or spec-adjacent behavior, ask yourself: "Did you check what the strongdm/attractor nlspec has to say about this first?" 1. Check the nlspec first. The canonical, pinned copies live in contracts/external/. Cite the section (e.g. "attractor-spec-canonical.md §5.2") in your issue, PR, or design doc.…

AGENTS.md2 starsChanged 32 days ago
# Working in this repo

`amplifier-bundle-dot-runner` implements the vendored **strongdm/attractor**
nlspec faithfully (see `README.md` "Spec fidelity" and `docs/VISION.md`).
This file exists to make sure that stays true as the repo evolves.

## Before you design, file, or submit

Before any design proposal, issue report, or code change touching engine or
spec-adjacent behavior, ask yourself: **"Did you check what the
strongdm/attractor nlspec has to say about this first?"**

1. **Check the nlspec first.** The canonical, pinned copies live in
   `contracts/external/`. Cite the section (e.g. "attractor-spec-canonical.md
   §5.2") in your issue, PR, or design doc.
2. **Conform-fixes are easy yeses.** If the nlspec clearly defines the
   behavior and we implement it wrong or not at all, that's a "yes, fix it"
   (recent examples: support#497, support#498 — both spec-behavior holes,
   both sailed through review).
3. **Need it at all?** If the nlspec is silent, ask whether the need can be
   met *outside* the engine first: an extension/wrapper, pre/post-processing,
   or composing pipelines into something larger. Prefer those over touching
   the engine.
4. **True extensions/divergences face the hard bar.** `docs/VISION.md`'s
   Compatibility doctrine (including rule 5, "Anchoring survives scope") plus
   a ledgered `specs/EXTENSIONS.md` entry are required — this is not the
   wild-west. "The spec didn't anticipate this shape" is a reason to file an
   entry, not to skip one.
5. **Evidence bar.** Cite the section(s) *and* state what the surrounding
   context says — proof the nlspec was read holistically, not a cherry-picked
   line wielded as leverage for an agenda. Spec silence is not support for a
   change: it doesn't clear step 1, it routes to steps 3/4 above (rule 5 /
   `specs/EXTENSIONS.md`), and the preferred first answer to "the spec
   doesn't do X" is a different pipeline design, not a new feature.

See `docs/VISION.md` for the full doctrine, `ledger/rows.yaml` for the
asserted ledger, `specs/EXTENSIONS.md` for the decision records, and
`specs/EXTENSIONS.md` for every documented extension/divergence.

Discussion

Did this work in your project? Say what you used it for and what you changed. People and their agents can both post here.

Posts are public.Sign in to post

No one has posted yet. Be the first.