fluid-release
Skill4.9k starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Fluid Framework client release group — minor releases, patch releases, and post-release type test updates. Covers release prep, branching, version bumps, changelogs, release notes, and type test baselines. In autonomous mode, auto-detects state from the repo, attempts to execute, and falls back to a GitHub issue on failure. Triggers on "release", "do the release", "release status", version bump, release notes, changelog, release branch, or release engineering.
- Installs packages
- Commits and pushes
Trending
Less talk lately.about the whole repository
Who's talking about microsoft/FluidFramework
- A Hacker News story“Library for building distributed, real-time collaborative web applications”Hacker News · Sep 9, 2020 · 19 points
- microsoft/rushstack“[rush] Why does many Microsoft open-source projects not use rush.”GitHub · Oct 31, 2021 · 3 reactions
- Stack Overflow“How to connect to a Routerlicious local server?”Stack Overflow · Apr 27, 2021 · 3 votes
- microsoft/TypeScript“Design Meeting Notes, 2/17/2021”GitHub · Feb 17, 2021 · 3 reactions
- microsoft/TypeScript“Inline *_base declaration in d.ts files”GitHub · Aug 7, 2024 · 2 reactions
The biggest 5 of 62 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.
See all 62
Talked about on GitHub, Stack Overflow and Hacker News (62 times).
On GitHub · 50
- Oct 31, 2021[rush] Why does many Microsoft open-source projects not use rush. — microsoft/rushstack3 reactions · 6 comments
- Feb 17, 2021Design Meeting Notes, 2/17/2021 — microsoft/TypeScript3 reactions
- Aug 7, 2024Inline *_base declaration in d.ts files — microsoft/TypeScript2 reactions · 5 comments
- Jun 7, 2024[api-extractor] API report does not indicate if a class was `type` exported. — microsoft/rushstack2 reactions · 2 comments
- Mar 12, 2024Add support for pnpm lock file format 6 — microsoft/component-detection2 reactions · 7 comments
45 more on GitHub
- Apr 23, 2026[aw-compat] Bug: serena-tools-to-shared-import codemod leaves workflows broken in two edge cases — github/gh-aw1 reaction
- Sep 16, 2023Recursive types can depend on presence and source location of unused type declaration — microsoft/TypeScript1 reaction · 12 comments
- Mar 31, 2023Module-level tsdoc doesn't work — matrix-org/matrix-js-sdk1 reaction · 7 comments
- Oct 6, 2022Migrate to `pnpm` or Yarn 3 (from Yarn 1) — microsoft/vscode1 reaction · 2 comments
- Nov 3, 2026build(deps): Bump the fluid-framework-dependencies group across 3 directories with 39 updates — microsoft/FluidExamples0 reactions · 1 comment
- Oct 12, 2026Regressions between 0.34.13 and 1.3.34 — sinclairzx81/typebox0 reactions · 1 comment
- Oct 1, 2026build(deps): Bump the fluid-framework-dependencies group with 29 updates — microsoft/FluidHelloWorld0 reactions · 1 comment
- Jul 6, 2026Bump the fluid-framework-dependencies group across 1 directory with 51 updates — nmsimons/table-example0 reactions
- Jun 21, 2026[CORRUPTED] Synthetic Benchmark PR #27546 - [bench] prefix@b5720370 improvement(client): fix `exactOptionalPropertyTypes` for telemetry-utils — qodo-benchmark/FluidFramework0 reactions
- Jun 21, 2026[CLEAN] Synthetic Benchmark PR #27546 - [bench] prefix@b5720370 improvement(client): fix `exactOptionalPropertyTypes` for telemetry-utils — qodo-benchmark/FluidFramework0 reactions
- Jun 21, 2026[CORRUPTED] Synthetic Benchmark PR #27546 - [bench] prefix@9e4e683c improvement(client): fix `exactOptionalPropertyTypes` for telemetry-utils — qodo-benchmark/FluidFramework0 reactions
- Jun 21, 2026[CLEAN] Synthetic Benchmark PR #27546 - [bench] prefix@9e4e683c improvement(client): fix `exactOptionalPropertyTypes` for telemetry-utils — qodo-benchmark/FluidFramework0 reactions
- Jun 21, 2026[CORRUPTED] Synthetic Benchmark PR #27546 - [bench] prefix@0412ca76 improvement(client): fix `exactOptionalPropertyTypes` for telemetry-utils — qodo-benchmark/FluidFramework0 reactions
- Jun 21, 2026[CLEAN] Synthetic Benchmark PR #27546 - [bench] prefix@0412ca76 improvement(client): fix `exactOptionalPropertyTypes` for telemetry-utils — qodo-benchmark/FluidFramework0 reactions
- Jun 21, 2026[CORRUPTED] Synthetic Benchmark PR #27497 - [bench] improvement(client-ordered-collection): ConsensusQueueFactory generic — qodo-benchmark/FluidFramework0 reactions
- Jun 21, 2026[CLEAN] Synthetic Benchmark PR #27497 - [bench] improvement(client-ordered-collection): ConsensusQueueFactory generic — qodo-benchmark/FluidFramework0 reactions
- Jun 21, 2026[CORRUPTED] Synthetic Benchmark PR #27530 - [bench] Updated the client release group to use eslint-config-fluid v13.0 — qodo-benchmark/FluidFramework0 reactions
- Jun 21, 2026[CLEAN] Synthetic Benchmark PR #27530 - [bench] Updated the client release group to use eslint-config-fluid v13.0 — qodo-benchmark/FluidFramework0 reactions
- Jun 21, 2026[CORRUPTED] Synthetic Benchmark PR #27546 - [bench] improvement(client): fix `exactOptionalPropertyTypes` for telemetry-utils — qodo-benchmark/FluidFramework0 reactions
- Jun 21, 2026[CLEAN] Synthetic Benchmark PR #27546 - [bench] improvement(client): fix `exactOptionalPropertyTypes` for telemetry-utils — qodo-benchmark/FluidFrameworksays it tested it0 reactions
- Jun 21, 2026[CORRUPTED] Synthetic Benchmark PR #27521 - [bench] Fix version utils to get the versions it tries from the set it has installed — qodo-benchmark/FluidFrameworksays it tested it0 reactions
- Jun 21, 2026[CLEAN] Synthetic Benchmark PR #27521 - [bench] Fix version utils to get the versions it tries from the set it has installed — qodo-benchmark/FluidFrameworksays it tested it0 reactions
- Jun 21, 2026[CORRUPTED] Synthetic Benchmark PR #27508 - [bench] Remove unused credential flows in e2e tests and examples — qodo-benchmark/FluidFrameworksays it tested it0 reactions
- Jun 21, 2026[CLEAN] Synthetic Benchmark PR #27508 - [bench] Remove unused credential flows in e2e tests and examples — qodo-benchmark/FluidFrameworksays it tested it0 reactions
- Jun 4, 2026Bump @fluidframework/synthesize from 2.0.0-rc.1.0.1 to 2.0.0-rc.1.0.9 — jikanter/FluidHelloWorld0 reactions
- Jun 4, 2026Bump @fluidframework/tinylicious-client from 2.0.0-rc.1.0.1 to 2.102.0 — jikanter/FluidHelloWorld0 reactions
- Jun 4, 2026Bump @fluidframework/view-interfaces from 2.0.0-rc.1.0.1 to 2.0.0-rc.1.0.9 — jikanter/FluidHelloWorld0 reactions
- Jun 4, 2026Bump @fluidframework/merge-tree from 2.0.0-rc.1.0.1 to 2.0.0-rc.1.0.9 — jikanter/FluidHelloWorld0 reactions
- Jun 4, 2026Bump @fluidframework/driver-base from 2.0.0-rc.1.0.1 to 2.0.0-rc.1.0.9 — jikanter/FluidHelloWorld0 reactions
- May 30, 2026chore(deps): bump axios, @fluidframework/azure-client, @microsoft/live-share, fluid-framework and start-server-and-test in /live-share-dice-roller — VikkiDFoxCSA/microsoft-365-agents-toolkit-samples0 reactions
- May 1, 2026Bump fluid-framework from 1.4.0 to 2.100.0 in /samples/javascript/22.react-agile-poker — microsoft/live-share-sdk0 reactions
- May 1, 2026Bump @fluidframework/azure-client from 1.2.0 to 2.100.0 in /samples/typescript/21.react-media-template — microsoft/live-share-sdk0 reactions
- Apr 1, 2026Bump @fluidframework/azure-client from 1.2.0 to 2.91.0 in /samples/javascript/03.live-canvas-demo — microsoft/live-share-sdk0 reactions
- Apr 1, 2026Bump fluid-framework from 1.4.0 to 2.91.0 in /samples/javascript/01.dice-roller — microsoft/live-share-sdk0 reactions
- Apr 1, 2026Bump fluid-framework from 1.4.0 to 2.91.0 in /samples/javascript/03.live-canvas-demo — microsoft/live-share-sdk0 reactions
- Apr 1, 2026Bump @fluidframework/azure-client from 1.2.0 to 2.91.0 in /samples/javascript/01.dice-roller — microsoft/live-share-sdk0 reactions
- Mar 23, 2026Bump @fluidframework/test-utils from 1.4.0 to 2.91.0 in /packages/live-share-media — microsoft/live-share-sdk0 reactions
- Mar 23, 2026Bump fluid-framework from 1.4.0 to 2.91.0 in /packages/live-share-canvas — microsoft/live-share-sdk0 reactions
- Mar 23, 2026Bump @fluidframework/test-utils from 1.4.0 to 2.91.0 in /packages/live-share — microsoft/live-share-sdk0 reactions
- Mar 23, 2026Bump @fluidframework/test-runtime-utils from 1.4.0 to 2.91.0 in /packages/live-share-media — microsoft/live-share-sdk0 reactions
- Mar 4, 2026Bump the fluid-framework-dependencies group across 1 directory with 29 updates — nmsimons/fluid-vibe0 reactions
- Feb 10, 2026Bump axios, @fluidframework/server-services-client, @fluidframework/server-services-core, @fluidframework/server-services-shared and @fluidframework/server-services-utils in /server/gitrest — sniten/FluidFramework0 reactions
- Feb 9, 2026Bump axios, @fluidframework/server-lambdas, @fluidframework/server-local-server, @fluidframework/server-memory-orderer, @fluidframework/server-services-client, @fluidframework/server-services-core, @fluidframework/server-services-shared, @fluidframework/server-services-utils and @fluidframework/serv — sniten/FluidFramework0 reactions
- Nov 26, 2025[Dependabot] build(devdeps): bump @fluidframework/eslint-config-fluid from 5.7.4 to 8.1.0 — tylerbutler/tools-monorepo0 reactions
- Sep 25, 2025Bump the fluid-framework-dependencies group across 1 directory with 40 updates — augustniehaus/resourcemapfluid0 reactions · 1 comment
On Stack Overflow · 8
- Apr 27, 2021How to connect to a Routerlicious local server?3 votes · 1 answer
- Oct 14, 2020How to insert SharedMap into SharedObjetSequence2 votes
- Feb 19, 2021How to understand SequencedLambda(KafkaRunner) and DocumentPartition(DocumentLambda),and their related, in fluid-framework1 vote · 1 answer
- Jan 9, 2021How to start the Fluid Framework Server with minimum requirements?1 vote
- Jun 20, 2022How to deploy the Routerlicious fluid-server(fluid framework) using the Kubernetes?0 votes · 1 answer
3 more on Stack Overflow
- Oct 29, 2021How to consume routerlicious without experimental packages?0 votes
- Jul 9, 2021Can the tinylicious server be launched at a port other than 3000?0 votes
- Jun 4, 2021What is the strategy of SharedString on Merging data?0 votes
On Hacker News · 4
- Sep 9, 2020Library for building distributed, real-time collaborative web applications19 points
- Sep 9, 2020Microsoft/FluidFramework: Library for building real-time collaborative web apps2 points
- Jan 11, 2024FluidFramework: Build distributed, real-time collaborative web applications1 point
- Sep 9, 2020TypeScript library for building distributed, real-time collaborative web apps1 point
In this repository34 other files it gives its agents.
- server/gitrest/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- server/historian/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- build-tools/.github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- ff-oce-dashboardSkill
- ff-oce-kustoSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- building-ui-uxSkill
- creating-debug-tests-and-iteratingSkill
- creating-skillsSkill
- finishing-a-development-branchSkill
- handle-large-tasksSkill
- receiving-code-reviewSkill
- root-cause-tracingSkill
- starting-noriSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- testing-anti-patternsSkill
- updating-noridocsSkill
- using-git-worktreesSkill
- using-screenshotsSkill
- using-skillsSkill
- webapp-testingSkill
- writing-plansSkill
- api-changesSkill
- ci-readiness-checkSkill
- comparison-baseSkill
- fluid-pr-guideSkill
- fluid-prSkill
- pipeline-test-triageSkill
- policy-checkSkill
- review-pr-localSkill
- reviewSkill
- trigger-pipelines-for-copilot-prSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
27 rules. About 0 are common, 16 are distinctive, and 11 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈16
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
11
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
If the run differs from these instructions, report the discrepancy and investigate before proceeding.
- Distinctive: line 13
If you cannot access the run state, report that limitation rather than guessing or queueing a duplicate run.
- Very specific: line 17
Check the CI environment variable at the start of every session:
- Distinctive: line 41
Run commands autonomously but pause before creating PRs, pushing branches, or triggering builds.
- Distinctive: line 45
Run the entire selected phase end-to-end without pausing.
- Distinctive: line 50
If the user provides versions, use them unless they conflict with repo state.
- Very specific: line 51
No confirmation pauses: Create PRs, push branches, and run flub release without asking.
- Distinctive: line 69
Use the version on main for a new minor release and increment its minor version by 1 for the next development version.
- Distinctive: line 70
If the version bump has already merged, use the release-prep PR or pre-bump commit to recover the release version.
- Distinctive: line 79
Ask for clarification only when repo state is ambiguous or conflicts with user-provided versions or phase.
- Very specific: line 98
If that run succeeded, find the automatically triggered Publish - client packages (definition 219) run whose candidate resource matches …
- Distinctive: line 99
Verify the candidate's release branch and commit, and confirm the Publish to public npmjs.org through ESRP Release API stage succeeds, …
- Distinctive: line 101
If ADO pipeline state cannot be queried, do not infer which action is next.
- Distinctive: line 124
Use the requested phase, or auto-detect it from repo state as described above.
- Distinctive: line 125
Ask only if the phase is ambiguous or conflicts with the request.
- Very specific: line 153
Git remote preference: When pushing branches, prefer pushing to upstream if one is configured for the repo.
- Very specific: line 154
Working branch naming: Do NOT use the release/ prefix for working branches because release/ is protected on upstream.
- Very specific: line 166
After using npm pkg set to bump versions, also run pnpm -r run build:genver to update packageVersion.ts files, and pnpm install …
- Distinctive: line 186
Before starting any phase, check for existing progress by looking at branches and PRs:
- Distinctive: line 195
If branches or PRs already exist, skip completed steps and resume from where the process left off.
- Very specific: line 199
Run pnpm flub release prepare client to check readiness.
- Distinctive: line 206
If either command returns results, stop and report the blockers to the user.
- Very specific: line 215
Run these autonomously in both modes: policy-check:asserts, layerGeneration:gen, flub generate releaseNotes, flub generate changelog, …
- Very specific: line 221
Use the build: conventional commit prefix for all release PR titles (e.g., build: tag untagged asserts for 2.90.0 release).
- Very specific: line 245
If any step in autonomous mode fails (permission errors, command failures, git push rejected, etc.), stop and open a GitHub issue in …
- Very specific: line 252
Use the title format Release <VERSION>: <brief description of failure> and label it with release-blocking.
- Distinctive: line 255
Read the appropriate reference file for the phase the user selects, then guide them through it step by step.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Fluid Framework Client Release
Release workflow for the client release group. Supports two modes: interactive (default) and autonomous.
Pipeline behavior can change: verify the actual run's candidate, metadata, and stages before recommending a publishing action. If the run differs from these instructions, report the discrepancy and investigate before proceeding. If you cannot access the run state, report that limitation rather than guessing or queueing a duplicate run.
Environment Detection
Check the CI environment variable at the start of every session:
CI=true: Running in a GitHub Actions workflow. Use onlyorigin(noupstream). Use CI-safe commands (see CI-safe alternatives). Never prompt for input. Log blockers and phase completions to workflow output for human review.CIunset or false: Running locally. Useupstream/origindetection as described in Key Context.
Select the remote once for repository-state checks:
release_remote=origin
if [ "$CI" != "true" ] && git remote get-url upstream >/dev/null 2>&1; then
release_remote=upstream
fiMode Selection
At the start of every release session, ask the user:
Would you like to run in interactive or autonomous mode?
In CI (CI=true), always use autonomous mode — do not prompt.
Interactive Mode (default)
Run commands autonomously but pause before creating PRs, pushing branches, or triggering builds. Ask for version confirmation at key points. This is the current behavior.
Autonomous Mode
Run the entire selected phase end-to-end without pausing. Auto-detect the release state from the repo (see below). If the user provides version info upfront, skip the version questions entirely.
Requirements:
- Version detection: Infer version numbers from repo state by default (see below). If the user provides versions, use them unless they conflict with repo state.
- No confirmation pauses: Create PRs, push branches, and run
flub releasewithout asking. Include clear commit messages and PR descriptions. - Phase-scoped execution: Each phase runs to completion, then reports what the user needs to do next (e.g., "queue the ADO release build", "monitor the automatically triggered publish run", or "prepare type test updates after publication").
- Fallback to issues: If any step fails (permission errors, CI-safe command failures, git push rejected, or any other error that prevents progress), stop and open a GitHub issue in
microsoft/FluidFrameworkdescribing what was completed, what failed, and what remains. Use the title formatRelease <VERSION>: <brief description>and label it withrelease-blocking. Include the exact commands remaining so a human can finish using the skill in interactive mode.
Auto-detecting release state (autonomous mode and CI)
Auto-detect the release state from the repo using the detection steps below. In interactive mode, this detection also runs when the user gives a generic request like "do the release" without specifying a version or phase.
Step 1: Identify the most recent release.
# Get the latest client release tag
git tag -l 'client_v*' --sort=-version:refname | head -1Step 2: Identify the release version from repo state.
Inspect release-prep branches/PRs, release branches, and tags for a release already in progress.
Use the version on main for a new minor release and increment its minor version by 1 for the next development version.
If the version bump has already merged, use the release-prep PR or pre-bump commit to recover the release version.
# Inspect the development version and existing release branches
git fetch "$release_remote" main
git show "${release_remote}/main:package.json"
git ls-remote --heads "$release_remote" 'release-prep/*' 'release/client/*'Ask for clarification only when repo state is ambiguous or conflicts with user-provided versions or phase. In CI, report the ambiguity or conflict and stop instead of prompting.
Step 3: Check if a release is in progress.
# Check for release-prep branches for the next version
git ls-remote --heads "$release_remote" 'release-prep/<NEXT_VERSION>/*'
# Check for the release branch
git ls-remote --heads "$release_remote" 'release/client/<NEXT_MAJOR>.<NEXT_MINOR>'
# Check for a release tag
git tag -l 'client_v<NEXT_VERSION>'
# Check for open PRs
gh pr list --repo microsoft/FluidFramework --search "release-prep/<NEXT_VERSION>" --state allFor a release branch with no completed release, also inspect ADO pipeline state:
- Find the Build - client packages (definition 12) run for the release branch tip with
releaseBuildOverride: release. - If that run succeeded, find the automatically triggered Publish - client packages (definition 219) run whose
candidateresource matches that build. Verify the candidate's release branch and commit, and confirm the Publish to public npmjs.org through ESRP Release API stage succeeds, rather than being skipped. Publication destinations come from the candidate's recorded metadata. - If ADO pipeline state cannot be queried, do not infer which action is next. Report that a human must identify whether the release build or publish pipeline has completed.
Step 4: Determine the phase and act.
| State | Action |
| No release-prep branches, no release branch | Start minor release prep (Steps 1-5) |
| Release-prep branches/PRs exist, some not merged | Resume minor release prep from where it left off |
| Release branch exists, no successful release build | Resume release execution — queue the ADO release build |
| Successful release build exists, matching publish run is pending or running | Resume release execution — monitor the automatically triggered publish run; do not queue a duplicate |
| Successful release build exists, matching publish run is missing or failed | Investigate the trigger or failed run using the current publishing instructions; do not queue a replacement blindly |
| Successful public publish run exists, exact GitHub/npm release not yet available | Wait for publication to propagate; investigate the publish run if it does not appear |
| Exact GitHub/npm release verified, no patch bump PR | Resume release execution — do the patch bump (Step 7) |
| Exact GitHub/npm release verified, patch bump done, no type test PRs | Start type test updates (Steps 8-9) without waiting until the next day |
| All phases complete | Report that the release is fully done and show the next release version from main |
Present the detected state and chosen action to the user (or in the issue body). Example:
Detected state:
mainis at 2.91.0. No release-prep branches found. The most recent release is 2.90.0. Action: Minor release prep needed for 2.91.0 (next version on main: 2.92.0).
Workflow Selection
Use the requested phase, or auto-detect it from repo state as described above. Ask only if the phase is ambiguous or conflicts with the request; in CI, report the blocker and stop.
| Phase | When to use | CI-automatable? | Reference |
| Minor release prep | Starting a new minor release from main (Steps 1-5) | Yes (Steps 1-4 create PRs; Step 5 is a human step) | minor-release-prep.md |
| Release execution | Running and publishing the release build + patch bump (Steps 6-7). Also used for patch releases on existing branches. | Partially (Step 6 = human queues ADO build; publishing auto-triggers; Step 7 = CI-automatable) | release-execution.md |
| Type test updates | After release: update baselines on main and release branch (Steps 8-9) | Yes (must be resilient to failure if npm packages not yet available) | type-test-updates.md |
For patch releases, skip directly to release execution on an existing release branch.
Human checkpoints
These steps require human action and should be clearly reported in CI workflow logs:
- Merge release-prep PRs in the correct order (version bump last) after CI creates them
- Create the release branch (Step 5) — requires elevated permissions on the
release/branch prefix - Queue the ADO release build (Step 6) — choose the "release" option in ADO
- Approve manual publishing recovery, if needed (Step 6) — normal publishing auto-triggers; a manually queued recovery run requires the publication approval gate
- Announce the release in the Fluid Framework "General" Teams channel
Key Context
- The repo uses
pnpmas the package manager flubis the Fluid build CLI (pnpm flub ...orpnpm exec flub ...)- Version scheme: The version numbering is not a simple incrementing pattern (it is NOT always multiples of 10). When suggesting a next version, default to incrementing the minor version by 1 (e.g., 2.90.0 -> 2.91.0). Trust the version the user provides unless it is more than 7-8 minor versions away from the current version (which likely indicates an error).
- Release branch naming:
release/client/<major>.<minor>(e.g.,release/client/2.90) - The release branch is created from the commit before the version bump on
main - There is no
lerna.jsonin this repo - Git remote preference: When pushing branches, prefer pushing to
upstreamif one is configured for the repo. Check withgit remote -vif unsure. Only fall back tooriginif noupstreamremote exists. Exception: In CI (CI=true), always useorigin— there is noupstream. - Working branch naming: Do NOT use the
release/prefix for working branches becauserelease/is protected on upstream. Use the standard naming convention below — these branches double as progress markers.
CI-safe Command Alternatives
Some flub commands require interactive TTY input. In CI, use these alternatives:
| Interactive command | CI-safe alternative |
flub bump client --bumpType patch | pnpm -r --include-workspace-root exec npm pkg set version=<VERSION> followed by pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile |
flub bump client --exact <VERSION> --no-commit | pnpm -r --include-workspace-root exec npm pkg set version=<VERSION> |
flub release -g client -t patch | Not needed in CI. The release build is queued manually by a human in ADO. CI only handles prep and post-release phases. |
After using npm pkg set to bump versions, also run pnpm -r run build:genver to update packageVersion.ts files, and pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile to update the lockfile.
Non-interactive flub commands that are safe in CI (no TTY required): flub generate releaseNotes, flub generate changelog, flub typetests, flub release prepare.
Working Branch Convention
Working branches follow a numbered naming scheme under release-prep/<VERSION>/:
| Step | Branch name |
| 1 | release-prep/<VERSION>/1-tag-asserts |
| 2 | release-prep/<VERSION>/2-compat-gen |
| 3 | release-prep/<VERSION>/3-release-notes |
| 4 | release-prep/<VERSION>/4-bump-<NEXT_VERSION> |
Example for releasing 2.90.0 with next version 2.91.0:
release-prep/2.90.0/1-tag-asserts, release-prep/2.90.0/4-bump-2.91.0
Detecting Prior Progress
Before starting any phase, check for existing progress by looking at branches and PRs:
# Check for existing release-prep branches on the selected remote
git ls-remote --heads "$release_remote" 'release-prep/<VERSION>/*'
# Check for open release-prep PRs
gh pr list --repo microsoft/FluidFramework --search "release-prep/<VERSION>" --state allIf branches or PRs already exist, skip completed steps and resume from where the process left off.
Before Starting
Run pnpm flub release prepare client to check readiness. Then check for release blockers:
gh issue list --repo microsoft/FluidFramework --label release-blocking --state open
gh pr list --repo microsoft/FluidFramework --label release-blocking --state openIf either command returns results, stop and report the blockers to the user. In autonomous mode, do not proceed past this check if blockers exist. Also remind the user to check ADO for release-blocking issues (cannot be queried via CLI).
Blocker handling (autonomous and CI): If the agent is blocked at any point (release blockers, missing release tag, npm packages not available, permission errors, or any other issue that prevents progress), open a GitHub issue in microsoft/FluidFramework describing what was completed, what failed, and what human action is needed. Use the title format Release <VERSION>: <brief description> and label it with release-blocking. Include the exact commands remaining so a human can finish using the skill in interactive mode. Then exit gracefully.
For confirmed post-release feed propagation delays, follow type test update recovery instead of immediately filing a release blocker.
Behavior by Mode
Commands (both modes)
Run these autonomously in both modes: policy-check:asserts, layerGeneration:gen, flub generate releaseNotes, flub generate changelog, build:genver, flub typetests, flub release prepare
For version bumps, use flub bump locally or CI-safe alternatives in CI (see CI-safe alternatives).
PR Conventions
Use the build: conventional commit prefix for all release PR titles (e.g., build: tag untagged asserts for 2.90.0 release).
Checkpoints
| Action | Interactive | Autonomous |
| Creating PRs | Pause and confirm | Create automatically with descriptive titles/bodies |
| Pushing branches | Pause and confirm | Push automatically |
Running flub release | Pause and confirm | Run automatically |
| Version determination | Infer from repo state; ask only if ambiguous or conflicting | Use version provided upfront or auto-detect |
| Announcing releases | Remind user | Remind user (never auto-announce) |
| ADO release build queuing | Instruct user | Instruct user |
| ADO publish run | Monitor auto-triggered run; manual recovery requires human approval | Monitor auto-triggered run; manual recovery requires human approval |
Autonomous Mode: Phase Completion Reports
At the end of each autonomous phase, provide a summary:
- What was done — list all PRs created, branches pushed, commands run
- What to do next — specific manual steps needed (e.g., queue ADO build, merge PRs in order)
- When to continue — timing guidance for the next phase (e.g., "after PRs merge" or "after publication is verified; prepare type test updates without waiting for feed propagation")
Autonomous Mode: Fallback to Issues
If any step in autonomous mode fails (permission errors, command failures, git push rejected, etc.), stop and open a GitHub issue in microsoft/FluidFramework with:
- What was completed — PRs created, branches pushed, commands run successfully
- What failed — the specific error and which step it occurred at
- What remains — the exact commands for remaining steps, ready to copy-paste
- How to finish — remind the human to invoke the
fluid-releaseskill in an interactive GitHub Copilot session
Use the title format Release <VERSION>: <brief description of failure> and label it with release-blocking.
Confirmed post-release feed propagation delays use the retry guidance in type test updates instead.
Read the appropriate reference file for the phase the user selects, then guide them through it step by step.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

