agentleFS
MicrosoftKnown publishermicrosoft/FluidFramework/.github/skills/fluid-release/SKILL.md

fluid-release

Skill4.9k starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Fluid Framework client release group — minor releases, patch releases, and post-release type test updates. Covers release prep, branching, version bumps, changelogs, release notes, and type test baselines. In autonomous mode, auto-detects state from the repo, attempts to execute, and falls back to a GitHub issue on failure. Triggers on "release", "do the release", "release status", version bump, release notes, changelog, release branch, or release engineering.

  • Installs packages
  • Commits and pushes

Trending

Less talk lately.about the whole repository

Dec 2025: 0 mentionsJan 2026: 0 mentionsFeb 2026: 2 mentionsMar 2026: 5 mentionsApr 2026: 5 mentionsMay 2026: 3 mentionsJun 2026: 21 mentionsJul 2026: 1 mentionAug 2026: 0 mentionsSep 2026: 0 mentionsOct 2026: 2 mentionsNov 2026: 1 mention
Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Mentions a month of the microsoft/FluidFramework repository that our weekly crawl found. There is no adoption data for this file yet.

Who's talking about microsoft/FluidFramework

The biggest 5 of 62 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.

See all 62

Talked about on GitHub, Stack Overflow and Hacker News (62 times).

On GitHub · 50

45 more on GitHub

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

27 rules. About 0 are common, 16 are distinctive, and 11 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈16

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 11

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If the run differs from these instructions, report the discrepancy and investigate before proceeding.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    If you cannot access the run state, report that limitation rather than guessing or queueing a duplicate run.

    line 13
  3. Very specific:

    Check the CI environment variable at the start of every session:

    line 17
  4. Distinctive:

    Run commands autonomously but pause before creating PRs, pushing branches, or triggering builds.

    line 41
  5. Distinctive:

    Run the entire selected phase end-to-end without pausing.

    line 45
  6. Distinctive:

    If the user provides versions, use them unless they conflict with repo state.

    line 50
  7. Very specific:

    No confirmation pauses: Create PRs, push branches, and run flub release without asking.

    line 51
  8. Distinctive:

    Use the version on main for a new minor release and increment its minor version by 1 for the next development version.

    line 69
  9. Distinctive:

    If the version bump has already merged, use the release-prep PR or pre-bump commit to recover the release version.

    line 70
  10. Distinctive:

    Ask for clarification only when repo state is ambiguous or conflicts with user-provided versions or phase.

    line 79
  11. Very specific:

    If that run succeeded, find the automatically triggered Publish - client packages (definition 219) run whose candidate resource matches …

    line 98
  12. Distinctive:

    Verify the candidate's release branch and commit, and confirm the Publish to public npmjs.org through ESRP Release API stage succeeds, …

    line 99
  13. Distinctive:

    If ADO pipeline state cannot be queried, do not infer which action is next.

    line 101
  14. Distinctive:

    Use the requested phase, or auto-detect it from repo state as described above.

    line 124
  15. Distinctive:

    Ask only if the phase is ambiguous or conflicts with the request.

    line 125
  16. Very specific:

    Git remote preference: When pushing branches, prefer pushing to upstream if one is configured for the repo.

    line 153
  17. Very specific:

    Working branch naming: Do NOT use the release/ prefix for working branches because release/ is protected on upstream.

    line 154
  18. Very specific:

    After using npm pkg set to bump versions, also run pnpm -r run build:genver to update packageVersion.ts files, and pnpm install …

    line 166
  19. Distinctive:

    Before starting any phase, check for existing progress by looking at branches and PRs:

    line 186
  20. Distinctive:

    If branches or PRs already exist, skip completed steps and resume from where the process left off.

    line 195
  21. Very specific:

    Run pnpm flub release prepare client to check readiness.

    line 199
  22. Distinctive:

    If either command returns results, stop and report the blockers to the user.

    line 206
  23. Very specific:

    Run these autonomously in both modes: policy-check:asserts, layerGeneration:gen, flub generate releaseNotes, flub generate changelog, …

    line 215
  24. Very specific:

    Use the build: conventional commit prefix for all release PR titles (e.g., build: tag untagged asserts for 2.90.0 release).

    line 221
  25. Very specific:

    If any step in autonomous mode fails (permission errors, command failures, git push rejected, etc.), stop and open a GitHub issue in …

    line 245
  26. Very specific:

    Use the title format Release <VERSION>: <brief description of failure> and label it with release-blocking.

    line 252
  27. Distinctive:

    Read the appropriate reference file for the phase the user selects, then guide them through it step by step.

    line 255

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Fluid Framework Client Release

Release workflow for the client release group. Supports two modes: interactive (default) and autonomous.

Pipeline behavior can change: verify the actual run's candidate, metadata, and stages before recommending a publishing action. If the run differs from these instructions, report the discrepancy and investigate before proceeding. If you cannot access the run state, report that limitation rather than guessing or queueing a duplicate run.

Environment Detection

Check the CI environment variable at the start of every session:

  • CI=true: Running in a GitHub Actions workflow. Use only origin (no upstream). Use CI-safe commands (see CI-safe alternatives). Never prompt for input. Log blockers and phase completions to workflow output for human review.
  • CI unset or false: Running locally. Use upstream/origin detection as described in Key Context.

Select the remote once for repository-state checks:

release_remote=origin
if [ "$CI" != "true" ] && git remote get-url upstream >/dev/null 2>&1; then
    release_remote=upstream
fi

Mode Selection

At the start of every release session, ask the user:

Would you like to run in interactive or autonomous mode?

In CI (CI=true), always use autonomous mode — do not prompt.

Interactive Mode (default)

Run commands autonomously but pause before creating PRs, pushing branches, or triggering builds. Ask for version confirmation at key points. This is the current behavior.

Autonomous Mode

Run the entire selected phase end-to-end without pausing. Auto-detect the release state from the repo (see below). If the user provides version info upfront, skip the version questions entirely.

Requirements:

  • Version detection: Infer version numbers from repo state by default (see below). If the user provides versions, use them unless they conflict with repo state.
  • No confirmation pauses: Create PRs, push branches, and run flub release without asking. Include clear commit messages and PR descriptions.
  • Phase-scoped execution: Each phase runs to completion, then reports what the user needs to do next (e.g., "queue the ADO release build", "monitor the automatically triggered publish run", or "prepare type test updates after publication").
  • Fallback to issues: If any step fails (permission errors, CI-safe command failures, git push rejected, or any other error that prevents progress), stop and open a GitHub issue in microsoft/FluidFramework describing what was completed, what failed, and what remains. Use the title format Release <VERSION>: <brief description> and label it with release-blocking. Include the exact commands remaining so a human can finish using the skill in interactive mode.

Auto-detecting release state (autonomous mode and CI)

Auto-detect the release state from the repo using the detection steps below. In interactive mode, this detection also runs when the user gives a generic request like "do the release" without specifying a version or phase.

Step 1: Identify the most recent release.

# Get the latest client release tag
git tag -l 'client_v*' --sort=-version:refname | head -1

Step 2: Identify the release version from repo state.

Inspect release-prep branches/PRs, release branches, and tags for a release already in progress. Use the version on main for a new minor release and increment its minor version by 1 for the next development version. If the version bump has already merged, use the release-prep PR or pre-bump commit to recover the release version.

# Inspect the development version and existing release branches
git fetch "$release_remote" main
git show "${release_remote}/main:package.json"
git ls-remote --heads "$release_remote" 'release-prep/*' 'release/client/*'

Ask for clarification only when repo state is ambiguous or conflicts with user-provided versions or phase. In CI, report the ambiguity or conflict and stop instead of prompting.

Step 3: Check if a release is in progress.

# Check for release-prep branches for the next version
git ls-remote --heads "$release_remote" 'release-prep/<NEXT_VERSION>/*'
# Check for the release branch
git ls-remote --heads "$release_remote" 'release/client/<NEXT_MAJOR>.<NEXT_MINOR>'
# Check for a release tag
git tag -l 'client_v<NEXT_VERSION>'
# Check for open PRs
gh pr list --repo microsoft/FluidFramework --search "release-prep/<NEXT_VERSION>" --state all

For a release branch with no completed release, also inspect ADO pipeline state:

  1. Find the Build - client packages (definition 12) run for the release branch tip with releaseBuildOverride: release.
  2. If that run succeeded, find the automatically triggered Publish - client packages (definition 219) run whose candidate resource matches that build. Verify the candidate's release branch and commit, and confirm the Publish to public npmjs.org through ESRP Release API stage succeeds, rather than being skipped. Publication destinations come from the candidate's recorded metadata.
  3. If ADO pipeline state cannot be queried, do not infer which action is next. Report that a human must identify whether the release build or publish pipeline has completed.

Step 4: Determine the phase and act.

StateAction
No release-prep branches, no release branchStart minor release prep (Steps 1-5)
Release-prep branches/PRs exist, some not mergedResume minor release prep from where it left off
Release branch exists, no successful release buildResume release execution — queue the ADO release build
Successful release build exists, matching publish run is pending or runningResume release execution — monitor the automatically triggered publish run; do not queue a duplicate
Successful release build exists, matching publish run is missing or failedInvestigate the trigger or failed run using the current publishing instructions; do not queue a replacement blindly
Successful public publish run exists, exact GitHub/npm release not yet availableWait for publication to propagate; investigate the publish run if it does not appear
Exact GitHub/npm release verified, no patch bump PRResume release execution — do the patch bump (Step 7)
Exact GitHub/npm release verified, patch bump done, no type test PRsStart type test updates (Steps 8-9) without waiting until the next day
All phases completeReport that the release is fully done and show the next release version from main

Present the detected state and chosen action to the user (or in the issue body). Example:

Detected state: main is at 2.91.0. No release-prep branches found. The most recent release is 2.90.0. Action: Minor release prep needed for 2.91.0 (next version on main: 2.92.0).

Workflow Selection

Use the requested phase, or auto-detect it from repo state as described above. Ask only if the phase is ambiguous or conflicts with the request; in CI, report the blocker and stop.

PhaseWhen to useCI-automatable?Reference
Minor release prepStarting a new minor release from main (Steps 1-5)Yes (Steps 1-4 create PRs; Step 5 is a human step)minor-release-prep.md
Release executionRunning and publishing the release build + patch bump (Steps 6-7). Also used for patch releases on existing branches.Partially (Step 6 = human queues ADO build; publishing auto-triggers; Step 7 = CI-automatable)release-execution.md
Type test updatesAfter release: update baselines on main and release branch (Steps 8-9)Yes (must be resilient to failure if npm packages not yet available)type-test-updates.md

For patch releases, skip directly to release execution on an existing release branch.

Human checkpoints

These steps require human action and should be clearly reported in CI workflow logs:

  1. Merge release-prep PRs in the correct order (version bump last) after CI creates them
  2. Create the release branch (Step 5) — requires elevated permissions on the release/ branch prefix
  3. Queue the ADO release build (Step 6) — choose the "release" option in ADO
  4. Approve manual publishing recovery, if needed (Step 6) — normal publishing auto-triggers; a manually queued recovery run requires the publication approval gate
  5. Announce the release in the Fluid Framework "General" Teams channel

Key Context

  • The repo uses pnpm as the package manager
  • flub is the Fluid build CLI (pnpm flub ... or pnpm exec flub ...)
  • Version scheme: The version numbering is not a simple incrementing pattern (it is NOT always multiples of 10). When suggesting a next version, default to incrementing the minor version by 1 (e.g., 2.90.0 -> 2.91.0). Trust the version the user provides unless it is more than 7-8 minor versions away from the current version (which likely indicates an error).
  • Release branch naming: release/client/<major>.<minor> (e.g., release/client/2.90)
  • The release branch is created from the commit before the version bump on main
  • There is no lerna.json in this repo
  • Git remote preference: When pushing branches, prefer pushing to upstream if one is configured for the repo. Check with git remote -v if unsure. Only fall back to origin if no upstream remote exists. Exception: In CI (CI=true), always use origin — there is no upstream.
  • Working branch naming: Do NOT use the release/ prefix for working branches because release/ is protected on upstream. Use the standard naming convention below — these branches double as progress markers.

CI-safe Command Alternatives

Some flub commands require interactive TTY input. In CI, use these alternatives:

Interactive commandCI-safe alternative
flub bump client --bumpType patchpnpm -r --include-workspace-root exec npm pkg set version=<VERSION> followed by pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile
flub bump client --exact <VERSION> --no-commitpnpm -r --include-workspace-root exec npm pkg set version=<VERSION>
flub release -g client -t patchNot needed in CI. The release build is queued manually by a human in ADO. CI only handles prep and post-release phases.

After using npm pkg set to bump versions, also run pnpm -r run build:genver to update packageVersion.ts files, and pnpm install --no-frozen-lockfile to update the lockfile.

Non-interactive flub commands that are safe in CI (no TTY required): flub generate releaseNotes, flub generate changelog, flub typetests, flub release prepare.

Working Branch Convention

Working branches follow a numbered naming scheme under release-prep/<VERSION>/:

StepBranch name
1release-prep/<VERSION>/1-tag-asserts
2release-prep/<VERSION>/2-compat-gen
3release-prep/<VERSION>/3-release-notes
4release-prep/<VERSION>/4-bump-<NEXT_VERSION>

Example for releasing 2.90.0 with next version 2.91.0: release-prep/2.90.0/1-tag-asserts, release-prep/2.90.0/4-bump-2.91.0

Detecting Prior Progress

Before starting any phase, check for existing progress by looking at branches and PRs:

# Check for existing release-prep branches on the selected remote
git ls-remote --heads "$release_remote" 'release-prep/<VERSION>/*'
# Check for open release-prep PRs
gh pr list --repo microsoft/FluidFramework --search "release-prep/<VERSION>" --state all

If branches or PRs already exist, skip completed steps and resume from where the process left off.

Before Starting

Run pnpm flub release prepare client to check readiness. Then check for release blockers:

gh issue list --repo microsoft/FluidFramework --label release-blocking --state open
gh pr list --repo microsoft/FluidFramework --label release-blocking --state open

If either command returns results, stop and report the blockers to the user. In autonomous mode, do not proceed past this check if blockers exist. Also remind the user to check ADO for release-blocking issues (cannot be queried via CLI).

Blocker handling (autonomous and CI): If the agent is blocked at any point (release blockers, missing release tag, npm packages not available, permission errors, or any other issue that prevents progress), open a GitHub issue in microsoft/FluidFramework describing what was completed, what failed, and what human action is needed. Use the title format Release <VERSION>: <brief description> and label it with release-blocking. Include the exact commands remaining so a human can finish using the skill in interactive mode. Then exit gracefully. For confirmed post-release feed propagation delays, follow type test update recovery instead of immediately filing a release blocker.

Behavior by Mode

Commands (both modes)

Run these autonomously in both modes: policy-check:asserts, layerGeneration:gen, flub generate releaseNotes, flub generate changelog, build:genver, flub typetests, flub release prepare

For version bumps, use flub bump locally or CI-safe alternatives in CI (see CI-safe alternatives).

PR Conventions

Use the build: conventional commit prefix for all release PR titles (e.g., build: tag untagged asserts for 2.90.0 release).

Checkpoints

ActionInteractiveAutonomous
Creating PRsPause and confirmCreate automatically with descriptive titles/bodies
Pushing branchesPause and confirmPush automatically
Running flub releasePause and confirmRun automatically
Version determinationInfer from repo state; ask only if ambiguous or conflictingUse version provided upfront or auto-detect
Announcing releasesRemind userRemind user (never auto-announce)
ADO release build queuingInstruct userInstruct user
ADO publish runMonitor auto-triggered run; manual recovery requires human approvalMonitor auto-triggered run; manual recovery requires human approval

Autonomous Mode: Phase Completion Reports

At the end of each autonomous phase, provide a summary:

  1. What was done — list all PRs created, branches pushed, commands run
  2. What to do next — specific manual steps needed (e.g., queue ADO build, merge PRs in order)
  3. When to continue — timing guidance for the next phase (e.g., "after PRs merge" or "after publication is verified; prepare type test updates without waiting for feed propagation")

Autonomous Mode: Fallback to Issues

If any step in autonomous mode fails (permission errors, command failures, git push rejected, etc.), stop and open a GitHub issue in microsoft/FluidFramework with:

  1. What was completed — PRs created, branches pushed, commands run successfully
  2. What failed — the specific error and which step it occurred at
  3. What remains — the exact commands for remaining steps, ready to copy-paste
  4. How to finish — remind the human to invoke the fluid-release skill in an interactive GitHub Copilot session

Use the title format Release <VERSION>: <brief description of failure> and label it with release-blocking. Confirmed post-release feed propagation delays use the retry guidance in type test updates instead.

Read the appropriate reference file for the phase the user selects, then guide them through it step by step.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.