agentleFS
MicrosoftKnown publishermicrosoft/FixLab/.agents/skills/codeblend-ai-composite/SKILL.md

codeblend-ai-composite

Skill0 starsChanged 59 days agoMITView on GitHub

Run or explain the complete AI-readiness evaluation for a Git repository with the bundled ai-readiness-eval CLI. Use for combined readiness, composite score, substrate and operation, full AI-readiness, two-axis readiness, requests to evaluate whether a repository is AI-ready, or questions about how the rubric, weights, tiers, consensus, and final score work.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈6

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Run the bundled evaluator for the host operating system once.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Use the directory supplied by the user when one is provided.

    line 20
  3. Distinctive:

    Stop with the Git error if the target is not inside a Git repository.

    line 24
  4. Distinctive:

    Stop clearly on macOS, Linux ARM64, or another unsupported platform.

    line 36
  5. Distinctive:

    Stop clearly if the executable is missing.

    line 38
  6. Distinctive:

    Run the evaluation against the resolved repository root:

    line 47
  7. Very specific:

    Keep the user's current working directory unchanged.

    line 61
  8. Very specific:

    Read the run directory printed by the CLI, then present its composite.md.

    line 66
  9. Very specific:

    Do not add --allow-missing-api-evidence unless the user explicitly accepts a degraded evaluation.

    line 82

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Combined AI-Readiness

Run the bundled evaluator for the host operating system once. The executable owns repository inspection, evidence collection, Copilot judge consensus, scoring, conservative execution-aware documentation drift analysis, report generation, and CSV export; do not reproduce those stages manually.

For questions about how the evaluation is designed or how scores are calculated, read and cite how-it-work.md. Do not run an evaluation merely to explain the methodology.

Workflow

  1. Determine the target directory:
    • Use the directory supplied by the user when one is provided.
    • Otherwise use the user's current working directory.
    • Resolve it to the repository root with git -C <target> rev-parse --show-toplevel.
    • Stop with the Git error if the target is not inside a Git repository.
  2. Detect the host operating system and architecture, then resolve the matching executable beside this SKILL.md:

    • On Windows amd64, use ai-readiness-eval.exe.
    • On Linux amd64 (including Ubuntu x86_64), use ai-readiness-eval-linux-amd64.
    • In an installed plugin, resolve the selected filename under ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/codeblend-ai-composite/.
    • In the source lab, resolve it in this skill directory.
    • On Linux, run chmod +x on the selected executable before invoking it in case the plugin installation did not preserve executable permissions.
    • Stop clearly on macOS, Linux ARM64, or another unsupported platform; do not try to run the Windows executable through Wine.
    • Stop clearly if the executable is missing; do not fall back to the legacy Python composite pipeline or scanner.

    On Windows, require [Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation]::OSArchitecture to be X64. On Linux, require uname -m to return x86_64 or amd64. Use the actual host result rather than inferring the platform from repository paths or the user's shell syntax.

  3. Run the evaluation against the resolved repository root:

    Windows PowerShell:

    & $Evaluator eval $RepoRoot

    Linux shell:

    "$evaluator" eval "$repo_root"

    Keep the user's current working directory unchanged. Pass through any evaluation flags the user explicitly supplied, such as --models, --max-rounds, --allow-missing-api-evidence, --full-findings, or --no-cache.

  4. Read the run directory printed by the CLI, then present its composite.md. Lead with the headline score, AI-ready verdict, substrate level, operation tier, highest-priority remediation items, and documentation drift coverage and residual action. Treat semantic review as advisory and automatic repair as a backstop; only a deterministic repository-wide blocking PR gate is complete coverage. Surface the continuous-cleanup automation rating when reported; the evaluator refines generic scheduled cleanup guidance only when executable cleanup capability is independently proven. Also report the run directory so the user can access the JSON and CSV artifacts.

Runtime requirements

  • git and GitHub Copilot CLI must be available on PATH.
  • GitHub repositories require an authenticated gh session for API evidence.
  • Azure DevOps repositories require an authenticated az session.
  • Do not add --allow-missing-api-evidence unless the user explicitly accepts a degraded evaluation.

Feedback

Report skill issues at https://github.com/gim-home/codeblend/issues.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.