agentleFS
MicrosoftKnown publishermicrosoft/Agents/agent-plugins/agents-for-js/skills/agents-sdk-to-prod/SKILL.md

agents-sdk-to-prod

Skill1.1k starsChanged 12 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when a user wants to assess, create, harden, deploy, or review the production readiness of JavaScript or TypeScript code built with the Microsoft 365 Agents SDK. Do not use for unrelated applications, services, or code that does not run or support an Agents SDK agent.

Trending

Quiet this year.thin dataabout the whole repository

Dec 2025: 0 mentionsJan 2026: 0 mentionsFeb 2026: 0 mentionsMar 2026: 0 mentionsApr 2026: 0 mentionsMay 2026: 0 mentionsJun 2026: 0 mentionsJul 2026: 0 mentionsAug 2026: 0 mentionsSep 2026: 0 mentionsOct 2026: 0 mentionsNov 2026: 0 mentions
Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Mentions a month of the microsoft/Agents repository that our weekly crawl found: only 1 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend. There is no adoption data for this file yet.

Who's talking about microsoft/Agents

The biggest 1 of 1 mention linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

14 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈9

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read Prepare an agent for production on Microsoft Learn first, using the JavaScript/TypeScript language selection.

    line 32
  2. Distinctive:

    Read the readiness matrix for assessment, dependency, status, and evidence rules.

    line 35
  3. Very specific:

    Use samples/nodejs/production-reference/ when it exists locally.

    line 37
  4. Distinctive:

    Ask only for unresolved decisions that materially affect architecture, cost, identity, channel, data handling, or side effects.

    line 74
  5. Distinctive:

    Add required controls first.

    line 81
  6. Distinctive:

    Add or update tests and operations documentation with each control.

    line 85
  7. Very specific:

    Run the repository-supported build, lint, unit, and integration checks that apply to the changed Agents SDK code.

    line 91
  8. Distinctive:

    Keep this assessment current through follow-up discussion.

    line 113
  9. Very specific:

    Do not use MemoryStorage in a production deployment.

    line 127
  10. Very specific:

    Do not add authorizeJWT when startServer or createAgentRequestHandler already owns JWT validation.

    line 132
  11. Distinctive:

    Treat the SDK outbound-host policy as opt-in and enable it explicitly in production.

    line 141
  12. Very specific:

    When the installed SDK requires connectionsMap.serviceUrl=* to select a default named connection, treat the wildcard only as connection …

    line 149
  13. Distinctive:

    Do not describe an agent as production-ready without deployment, test, and operator evidence.

    line 156
  14. Distinctive:

    Keep the user’s scenario small.

    line 158

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Move an Agents SDK sample toward production

Guide the user from an Agents SDK starter or existing agent to a bounded, evidence-backed production deployment. The outcome is not only changed source: it includes an explicit deployment target, applicable controls, verification evidence, and remaining production work.

Scope

Change only code, configuration, infrastructure, tests, and operations documentation that directly run, host, secure, observe, deploy, or support the Agents SDK agent. Preserve unrelated application code, user interfaces, services, libraries, and business behavior. If a required control needs a change outside this scope, explain the dependency and get user approval before expanding the task.

This skill applies to code built with @microsoft/agents-hosting, @microsoft/agents-hosting-express, or related Microsoft 365 Agents SDK packages. It is not a general production-readiness skill.

Sources

  1. Read Prepare an agent for production on Microsoft Learn first, using the JavaScript/TypeScript language selection. Treat the article and its linked shared production controls as normative.
  2. Read the readiness matrix for assessment, dependency, status, and evidence rules.
  3. Use samples/nodejs/production-reference/ when it exists locally; otherwise use the published production reference. It proves one Web Chat, App Service, and Blob profile. It is not a universal template.
  4. Inspect the installed SDK version and APIs before implementing changes. The guide defines the control; the installed SDK determines the valid code.

Workflow

1. Discover

  • Determine whether the user wants a new sample, an assessment, or changes to an existing sample. Do not ask when the request or repository already shows the answer.
  • Inspect the candidate Agents SDK sample before asking questions. If multiple samples exist, identify the requested sample or ask which one is in scope.
  • Identify channel, cloud, host, inbound audiences and issuers, trusted calling applications, downstream identities, outbound hosts, state, external dependencies, data classes, retention, scale, side effects, long-running work, model calls, retrieval, tools, token-bearing downloaders, attachments, transcripts, and proactive messaging.
  • State the deployment boundary. Do not broaden channel, host, identity, data, or application scope without user approval.

2. Assess

  • Classify every applicable readiness control as verified, implemented, missing, not applicable, or blocked using the readiness matrix.
  • Cite repository evidence for each verified or implemented result. Do not infer production evidence from the presence of source code.
  • For review or question-only requests, stop at guidance and assessment. Do not modify files.

3. Agree

  • Recommend the smallest suitable production profile and defaults.
  • Ask only for unresolved decisions that materially affect architecture, cost, identity, channel, data handling, or side effects.
  • Present the implementation sequence and identify changes that would extend beyond Agents SDK-related code. Obtain approval for that expansion.

4. Implement

  • Add required controls first. Add conditional controls only for capabilities present in the selected scenario.
  • Preserve the agent's intended behavior. Do not refactor unrelated code as part of production hardening.
  • Add or update tests and operations documentation with each control. Keep secrets and sensitive user content out of source, generated files, logs, errors, prompts, and telemetry.

5. Verify

  • Run the repository-supported build, lint, unit, and integration checks that apply to the changed Agents SDK code.
  • Exercise failed production configuration, authentication rejection, issuer and audience rejection, applicable caller authorization, service URL claim and outbound-host validation, payload rejection, safe errors, probes, graceful shutdown, and telemetry shutdown/redaction.
  • Validate state recovery only when state exists. Validate conditional controls only for capabilities in scope.
  • Separate local verification from deployed evidence. Do not claim that a control is verified when its required environment was not exercised.

6. Handoff

Report:

  1. The selected deployment boundary and current maturity state.
  2. Controls verified with file, test, deployment, or operator evidence.
  3. Controls implemented but not verified in the required environment.
  4. Missing or blocked controls and their production impact.
  5. Controls marked not applicable and why.
  6. The next deployment, smoke-test, rollback, and operations actions.

Keep this assessment current through follow-up discussion. Answer questions without losing the selected boundary, decisions, statuses, or next phase.

Maturity states

  • Code-hardened: applicable source controls exist and local checks pass.
  • Deployment-ready: infrastructure, production configuration, smoke tests, rollback, and operator documentation exist.
  • Production-verified: the deployed environment has passed authentication, state recovery where applicable, telemetry, alert, traffic-protection, smoke, and rollback checks.

Rules

  • Do not use MemoryStorage in a production deployment.
  • A stateless agent does not need durable state. Any agent state that must survive a turn, restart, or replica must use a durable store.
  • Protect the message endpoint and every non-health endpoint that changes data, sends messages, or calls a downstream API.
  • Do not add authorizeJWT when startServer or createAgentRequestHandler already owns JWT validation. Use an explicit adapter pipeline when caller or channel authorization must run after JWT validation and before activity processing.
  • Enable issuer validation in production. Configure the expected tenant and cloud-specific authority or issuers.
  • Decide whether application caller authorization applies. For trusted-app or agent-to-agent endpoints, authorize the verified azp or appid claim before adapter processing.
  • Treat the SDK outbound-host policy as opt-in and enable it explicitly in production. Decide whether the selected channel needs the built-in Microsoft hosts or a complete explicit host set. Configured hosts are suffix rules and also allow subdomains. Apply separate destination and network egress controls to arbitrary HTTP, model, retrieval, and tool clients.
  • For local tools that use loopback service URLs, disable the validator or allow only the required local host. Never carry a local-host exception into production.
  • When the installed SDK requires connectionsMap.serviceUrl=* to select a default named connection, treat the wildcard only as connection selection and keep exact audience and outbound-host validation enabled. Add channel-host middleware after JWT validation only when the deployment boundary is narrower than the SDK host policy.
  • Reuse the outbound policy with supported attachment downloaders. Do not assume that adapter validation protects arbitrary downloads or HTTP calls.
  • Do not describe an agent as production-ready without deployment, test, and operator evidence. Use the maturity states instead.
  • Keep the user’s scenario small. A production reference demonstrates architecture, not every SDK feature.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.