roadmap-planning
Skill1 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Annual and quarterly roadmap planning for engineering teams. Use when: building or updating a team roadmap, prioritizing initiatives, mapping dependencies across teams, preparing roadmap presentations for leadership, evaluating trade-offs between competing priorities, or aligning roadmap items to company strategy and OKRs.
17 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- okou-ai/okou-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- blueclover22/mw_agent_kittheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- vijaysuperpositionist/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- Maudeunfledged834/startup-founder-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- rampstackco/claude-skills-pmtheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use proto-persona, acquisition-channel-advisor and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
nandanosqlSkillproto-persona
Create hypothesis-driven user personas before doing full research. Uses behavioral attributes, goals, and frustrations to model target users quickly for early-stage alignment.
Also in 4 projects that use this
nandanosqlSkillacquisition-channel-advisor
Evaluate and recommend customer acquisition channels based on product type, target audience, budget, and stage — covering organic, paid, referral, partnerships, and product-led growth.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +9 more from nandanosql
Other versions17 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 17
- deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills★ 7.7ksame name
- shawnpang/startup-founder-skills★ 331same name
- manager-dot-dev/manager-skills★ 114same name
- okou-ai/okou-skills★ 81same name
- vm0-ai/vm0-skills★ 81same name
- DIAL-Studio/pm-agent-harness-kit★ 12same name
- Maudeunfledged834/startup-founder-skills★ 8same name
- The-Utopia-Studio/skills★ 6same name
- Dragoon0x/product-skills★ 4same name
- rampstackco/claude-skills-pm★ 4same name
7 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository42 other files it gives its agents.
- accessibility-testingSkill
- alternatives-analysisSkill
- anomaly-detectionSkill
- api-designSkill
- async-messagingSkill
- caching-strategiesSkill
- chartsSkill
- cicdSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- commsSkill
- critical-feedbackSkill
- data-analysisSkill
- databaseSkill
- data-migrationsSkill
- data-visualizationSkill
- dependency-managementSkill
- dockerSkill
- error-handlingSkill
- feature-flagsSkill
- git-workflowSkill
- goalsSkill
- ide-setupSkill
- large-changeSkill
- logging-metricsSkill
- markdown-docsSkill
- mcp-serverSkill
- meeting-agendasSkill
- okrsSkill
- presentationsSkill
- product-managementSkill
- prompt-writingSkill
- pythonSkill
- reclassificationSkill
- release-managementSkill
- retrospectivesSkill
- securitySkill
- stakeholder-commsSkill
- statisticsSkill
- status-updatesSkill
- testingSkill
- ticket-writingSkill
- typescriptSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 17 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 84
Use a structured framework.
- Distinctive: line 126
Document the allocation in your quarterly plan so the team and stakeholders share expectations.
- Distinctive: line 136
Only items in Now and Next should be broken into epics in your issue tracker.
- Distinctive: line 144
Create in your team's shared documentation tool (Confluence, Notion, Google Docs, etc.):
- Distinctive: line 177
When presenting to leadership:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 17 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Roadmap Planning
When to Use
- Building an annual or quarterly roadmap for your team
- Prioritizing competing initiatives when capacity is constrained
- Mapping cross-team dependencies for a planning cycle
- Preparing a roadmap presentation for leadership, stakeholders, or the team
- Re-evaluating priorities mid-cycle due to shifting business needs
- Translating company strategy into team-level initiatives
Roadmap Anatomy
A roadmap is not a feature list. It communicates what the team intends to accomplish, why, and in what sequence — at a level of abstraction appropriate for the audience.
Required Elements
| Element | Description |
| Theme | High-level area of investment (e.g., "Platform reliability", "Self-serve onboarding") |
| Initiative | A scoped body of work within a theme, deliverable within a quarter |
| Outcome | The measurable result the initiative produces (tied to OKR or business metric) |
| Owner | The person or squad accountable for delivery |
| Dependencies | Teams, services, or decisions this initiative depends on |
| Confidence | High / Medium / Low — how certain is this commitment? |
| Time horizon | Now (this sprint), Next (this quarter), Later (future quarter) |
What a Roadmap is NOT
- A Gantt chart with exact dates for every task
- A backlog sorted by priority
- A promise to stakeholders — it's a plan that evolves
- A list of features without outcomes
Planning Process
Step 1: Gather Inputs
Before planning, collect:
- Company/org OKRs — What is the company betting on this quarter/year?
- Customer feedback — Top pain points, feature requests, churn reasons
- Tech debt inventory — What slows the team down? What's fragile?
- Stakeholder requests — What do product, sales, support, and leadership need?
- Team retro themes — Recurring process or tooling frustrations
- Carry-over — Unfinished work from last cycle
Step 2: Generate Candidates
List all potential initiatives. For each, capture:
### Initiative: <Name>
- **Theme**: <which strategic area>
- **Problem**: <what problem does this solve>
- **Outcome**: <what measurable result>
- **Effort**: S / M / L / XL
- **Impact**: High / Medium / Low
- **Confidence**: High / Medium / Low
- **Dependencies**: <list any cross-team dependencies>
- **Requestor**: <who is asking for this>Step 3: Prioritize
Use a structured framework. Do not priority-sort by gut feeling alone.
RICE Framework (adapted)
| Factor | Definition | Scale |
| Reach | How many users/teams/customers are affected? | Number or % |
| Impact | How much does it improve the outcome? | 3 = massive, 2 = high, 1 = medium, 0.5 = low |
| Confidence | How sure are we about reach and impact? | 100% / 80% / 50% |
| Effort | Person-weeks to deliver | Number |
RICE Score = (Reach × Impact × Confidence) / Effort
Alternative: Value vs. Effort Matrix
For simpler prioritization, plot initiatives on a 2×2:
High Value
│
DO FIRST│ PLAN CAREFULLY
(quick │ (high effort,
wins) │ high value)
────────────┼──────────────── Effort →
FILL │ AVOID / DEFER
(low │ (high effort,
value, │ low value)
easy) │
Low ValueStep 4: Allocate Capacity
Split team capacity deliberately:
| Category | Target % | Examples |
| Roadmap features | 60–70% | New capabilities, customer-facing work |
| Tech debt / platform | 15–20% | Reliability, performance, developer experience |
| Support / unplanned | 10–15% | Bugs, incidents, ad hoc requests |
| Growth / learning | 5% | Spikes, prototypes, skill development |
Document the allocation in your quarterly plan so the team and stakeholders share expectations.
Step 5: Sequence and Commit
Arrange initiatives into time horizons:
- Now (this sprint/month): Actively in progress, fully committed
- Next (this quarter): High confidence, planned but not yet started
- Later (future quarter): Lower confidence, directional
Only items in Now and Next should be broken into epics in your issue tracker. Later stays in the roadmap doc to signal direction.
Roadmap Artifacts
Quarterly Roadmap Brief
Create in your team's shared documentation tool (Confluence, Notion, Google Docs, etc.):
# Q[N] YYYY Roadmap — [Team Name]
## Strategy Alignment
How this quarter's work connects to company OKRs.
## Themes
1. Theme A — why this matters
2. Theme B — why this matters
## Committed Initiatives
| Initiative | Theme | Owner | Outcome | Effort | Dependencies |
|-----------|-------|-------|---------|--------|-------------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
## Stretch / Aspirational
Initiatives we'd take on if capacity allows.
## What We're NOT Doing (and Why)
Explicitly list deprioritized requests and the reasoning.
## Risks and Dependencies
| Risk | Mitigation | Owner |
|------|-----------|-------|
## Capacity Allocation
Pie chart or table showing planned split.Roadmap Presentation (Leadership)
When presenting to leadership:
- Lead with outcomes, not features — "Reduce onboarding time from 3 days to 3 hours" not "Build self-serve provisioning"
- Show trade-offs — What you chose NOT to do and why
- Quantify confidence — Don't present everything as a guarantee
- Highlight dependencies and risks — Especially cross-team blockers
- Keep it to one page — Executives skim; make it scannable
Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Why It's Bad | Better Approach |
| Overcommitting | Everything is "committed" with no slack | Leave 15–20% unplanned capacity |
| Feature factory | Roadmap is a list of features with no outcomes | Every item must have a measurable outcome |
| Planning in isolation | No input from team members on effort or feasibility | Include ICs in estimation and trade-off discussions |
| All or nothing | Only big bets, no quick wins | Mix initiative sizes for momentum and morale |
| Ignoring tech debt | Debt compounds silently until it explodes | Allocate 15–20% deliberately per cycle |
| Roadmap as contract | Treating roadmap as immutable promise | Review and adjust monthly; communicate changes |
Review Cadence
| Frequency | Activity |
| Weekly | Check initiative progress against plan in standup or status update |
| Monthly | Review roadmap health — are we on track? Any re-prioritization needed? |
| Quarterly | Full roadmap refresh — score last quarter, plan next quarter |
| Annually | Strategic planning — set themes and direction for the year |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

