agentleFS
michaelsvanbeekmichaelsvanbeek/personal-agent-skills/skills/roadmap-planning/SKILL.md

roadmap-planning

Skill1 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Annual and quarterly roadmap planning for engineering teams. Use when: building or updating a team roadmap, prioritizing initiatives, mapping dependencies across teams, preparing roadmap presentations for leadership, evaluating trade-offs between competing priorities, or aligning roadmap items to company strategy and OKRs.

17 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use proto-persona, acquisition-channel-advisor and 9 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • nandanosqlSkill

    proto-persona

    Create hypothesis-driven user personas before doing full research. Uses behavioral attributes, goals, and frustrations to model target users quickly for early-stage alignment.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • nandanosqlSkill

    acquisition-channel-advisor

    Evaluate and recommend customer acquisition channels based on product type, target audience, budget, and stage — covering organic, paid, referral, partnerships, and product-led growth.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +9 more from nandanosql

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 17 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use a structured framework.

    line 84
  2. Distinctive:

    Document the allocation in your quarterly plan so the team and stakeholders share expectations.

    line 126
  3. Distinctive:

    Only items in Now and Next should be broken into epics in your issue tracker.

    line 136
  4. Distinctive:

    Create in your team's shared documentation tool (Confluence, Notion, Google Docs, etc.):

    line 144
  5. Distinctive:

    When presenting to leadership:

    line 177

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 17 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Roadmap Planning

When to Use

  • Building an annual or quarterly roadmap for your team
  • Prioritizing competing initiatives when capacity is constrained
  • Mapping cross-team dependencies for a planning cycle
  • Preparing a roadmap presentation for leadership, stakeholders, or the team
  • Re-evaluating priorities mid-cycle due to shifting business needs
  • Translating company strategy into team-level initiatives

Roadmap Anatomy

A roadmap is not a feature list. It communicates what the team intends to accomplish, why, and in what sequence — at a level of abstraction appropriate for the audience.

Required Elements

ElementDescription
ThemeHigh-level area of investment (e.g., "Platform reliability", "Self-serve onboarding")
InitiativeA scoped body of work within a theme, deliverable within a quarter
OutcomeThe measurable result the initiative produces (tied to OKR or business metric)
OwnerThe person or squad accountable for delivery
DependenciesTeams, services, or decisions this initiative depends on
ConfidenceHigh / Medium / Low — how certain is this commitment?
Time horizonNow (this sprint), Next (this quarter), Later (future quarter)

What a Roadmap is NOT

  • A Gantt chart with exact dates for every task
  • A backlog sorted by priority
  • A promise to stakeholders — it's a plan that evolves
  • A list of features without outcomes

Planning Process

Step 1: Gather Inputs

Before planning, collect:

  1. Company/org OKRs — What is the company betting on this quarter/year?
  2. Customer feedback — Top pain points, feature requests, churn reasons
  3. Tech debt inventory — What slows the team down? What's fragile?
  4. Stakeholder requests — What do product, sales, support, and leadership need?
  5. Team retro themes — Recurring process or tooling frustrations
  6. Carry-over — Unfinished work from last cycle

Step 2: Generate Candidates

List all potential initiatives. For each, capture:

### Initiative: <Name>

- **Theme**: <which strategic area>
- **Problem**: <what problem does this solve>
- **Outcome**: <what measurable result>
- **Effort**: S / M / L / XL
- **Impact**: High / Medium / Low
- **Confidence**: High / Medium / Low
- **Dependencies**: <list any cross-team dependencies>
- **Requestor**: <who is asking for this>

Step 3: Prioritize

Use a structured framework. Do not priority-sort by gut feeling alone.

RICE Framework (adapted)

FactorDefinitionScale
ReachHow many users/teams/customers are affected?Number or %
ImpactHow much does it improve the outcome?3 = massive, 2 = high, 1 = medium, 0.5 = low
ConfidenceHow sure are we about reach and impact?100% / 80% / 50%
EffortPerson-weeks to deliverNumber

RICE Score = (Reach × Impact × Confidence) / Effort

Alternative: Value vs. Effort Matrix

For simpler prioritization, plot initiatives on a 2×2:

        High Value
            │
    DO FIRST│  PLAN CAREFULLY
   (quick   │  (high effort,
    wins)   │   high value)
────────────┼──────────────── Effort →
    FILL    │  AVOID / DEFER
   (low     │  (high effort,
    value,  │   low value)
    easy)   │
        Low Value

Step 4: Allocate Capacity

Split team capacity deliberately:

CategoryTarget %Examples
Roadmap features60–70%New capabilities, customer-facing work
Tech debt / platform15–20%Reliability, performance, developer experience
Support / unplanned10–15%Bugs, incidents, ad hoc requests
Growth / learning5%Spikes, prototypes, skill development

Document the allocation in your quarterly plan so the team and stakeholders share expectations.

Step 5: Sequence and Commit

Arrange initiatives into time horizons:

  • Now (this sprint/month): Actively in progress, fully committed
  • Next (this quarter): High confidence, planned but not yet started
  • Later (future quarter): Lower confidence, directional

Only items in Now and Next should be broken into epics in your issue tracker. Later stays in the roadmap doc to signal direction.


Roadmap Artifacts

Quarterly Roadmap Brief

Create in your team's shared documentation tool (Confluence, Notion, Google Docs, etc.):

# Q[N] YYYY Roadmap — [Team Name]

## Strategy Alignment
How this quarter's work connects to company OKRs.

## Themes
1. Theme A — why this matters
2. Theme B — why this matters

## Committed Initiatives
| Initiative | Theme | Owner | Outcome | Effort | Dependencies |
|-----------|-------|-------|---------|--------|-------------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

## Stretch / Aspirational
Initiatives we'd take on if capacity allows.

## What We're NOT Doing (and Why)
Explicitly list deprioritized requests and the reasoning.

## Risks and Dependencies
| Risk | Mitigation | Owner |
|------|-----------|-------|

## Capacity Allocation
Pie chart or table showing planned split.

Roadmap Presentation (Leadership)

When presenting to leadership:

  1. Lead with outcomes, not features — "Reduce onboarding time from 3 days to 3 hours" not "Build self-serve provisioning"
  2. Show trade-offs — What you chose NOT to do and why
  3. Quantify confidence — Don't present everything as a guarantee
  4. Highlight dependencies and risks — Especially cross-team blockers
  5. Keep it to one page — Executives skim; make it scannable

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It's BadBetter Approach
OvercommittingEverything is "committed" with no slackLeave 15–20% unplanned capacity
Feature factoryRoadmap is a list of features with no outcomesEvery item must have a measurable outcome
Planning in isolationNo input from team members on effort or feasibilityInclude ICs in estimation and trade-off discussions
All or nothingOnly big bets, no quick winsMix initiative sizes for momentum and morale
Ignoring tech debtDebt compounds silently until it explodesAllocate 15–20% deliberately per cycle
Roadmap as contractTreating roadmap as immutable promiseReview and adjust monthly; communicate changes

Review Cadence

FrequencyActivity
WeeklyCheck initiative progress against plan in standup or status update
MonthlyReview roadmap health — are we on track? Any re-prioritization needed?
QuarterlyFull roadmap refresh — score last quarter, plan next quarter
AnnuallyStrategic planning — set themes and direction for the year

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.