agentleFS
mgiovanimgiovani/cc-arsenal/skills/git-commit/SKILL.md

git-commit

Skill8 starsChanged 48 days agoMITView on GitHub

Generate a conventional commit message (conventionalcommits.org) from the

174 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use git-pr, github-pr-create and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • klauswgSkill

    git-pr

    Prepare, review, publish, or update a complete GitHub pull request for the current repository, including local commit readiness, safe push strategy, semantic title validation, repository-native PR templates, issue linking, and checks verification. Use when the user asks to draft, create, submit, publish, open, or update a pull request. Always require the user to review and explicitly approve the exact final PR before any push or GitHub write.

    Also in 11 projects that use this

  • mjun0812Skill

    github-pr-create

    Pull Requestを作成するSkill。現在のbranchからpull requestを作成する。言語指定可能。 ユーザーが「PR作って」「pull request作成して」のように依頼したら使うこと。

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    git-branch

    Branch management for implementation. Use when you need to create a branch, switch branches, checkout, or verify branching strategy before implementing code. Do not use for commits (use git-commit), pull requests (use pull-request), or advanced git operations (rebase, merge).

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • klauswgSkill

    git-issue

    Prepare, review, create, or update evidence-based GitHub issues for the current repository with duplicate detection, repository-native templates, valid labels, and post-publication verification. Use when the user asks to draft, file, submit, publish, edit, or refine a GitHub issue, bug report, feature request, performance issue, or technical proposal. Always require the user to review and explicitly approve the exact final issue before any GitHub write.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • gologo13Skill

    git-push

    Push current branch to origin and sync with remote updates; keywords: git, rebase. Use only on explicit request; before execution, review diffs and list impact scope.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    github-pr-review

    Review a GitHub pull request and leave inline comments in a natural human reviewing voice, indistinguishable from comments typed by hand on the GitHub web UI. Deliberately bounded to defects a reader can settle by looking at the anchored line, rather than a deep audit, so every comment is cheap for the author to check. Scales to 2-20 comments by PR size, parallelises analysis across sub-agents, drafts for approval, then posts individually with human pacing. Use when the user says "review this PR", "review PR 123", pastes a github.com/.../pull/N link, or asks for comments on a pull request. Don't use for reviewing local uncommitted changes or a diff against a branch (use the `review` skill for that).

    Also in 4 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 134 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 6

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read git status and git diff --staged (or git diff if nothing is staged yet) before writing anything.

    line 29
  2. Distinctive:

    Check which files/modules changed before setting scope.

    line 30
  3. Distinctive:

    Look for removed exports, changed signatures, deleted functions to catch breaking changes.

    line 31
  4. Distinctive:

    If the purpose of a change is unclear, ask the user rather than guess.

    line 32
  5. Distinctive:

    Run git status and git diff --staged to see what actually changed.

    line 45
  6. Very specific:

    If the diff mixes unrelated concerns (e.g.

    line 46
  7. Distinctive:

    Ask for confirmation before committing if the changes are complex or span multiple concerns.

    line 80

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 134 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Git Commit

Generate a conventional commit message and create the commit.

Quality Guidelines

Base the message only on what the diff actually shows, not assumptions:

  1. Read git status and git diff --staged (or git diff if nothing is staged yet) before writing anything.
  2. Check which files/modules changed before setting scope.
  3. Look for removed exports, changed signatures, deleted functions to catch breaking changes.
  4. If the purpose of a change is unclear, ask the user rather than guess.

Pre-commit Linting

In Claude Code, a PreToolUse hook runs before every git commit: it detects the project's linter (Node's npm/bun/pnpm/yarn run lint, Python's ruff/flake8, make lint, rubocop, golangci-lint) and blocks the commit if it fails. No linter configured means the commit proceeds unblocked. Outside Claude Code (no hook support), run the project's lint command yourself before committing. Never bypass a failing lint with --no-verify: fix the errors and re-run the commit instead.

Workflow

  1. Run git status and git diff --staged to see what actually changed.
  2. If the diff mixes unrelated concerns (e.g. a feature plus an unrelated fix plus docs), split into separate commits by staging each group with git add <files> and committing them one at a time. Otherwise, one commit is enough, don't force a split.
  3. For each commit, pick the type:
    • feat: new feature
    • fix: bug fix
    • docs: documentation only
    • style: formatting, no code meaning change
    • refactor: neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
    • perf: performance improvement
    • test: adding or correcting tests
    • build: build system or dependency changes
    • ci: CI configuration/scripts
    • chore: everything else that doesn't touch src or tests
    • revert: reverts a previous commit
  4. Format as type(scope): description, scope optional, description imperative mood ("add" not "added"), max ~50 characters. Skip the body for a typo fix or a single dependency bump; add a wrapped body (why, not how) once the change alters behavior or touches multiple files. For breaking changes, append ! after the scope and add a BREAKING CHANGE: ... footer.

Example formats

feat(auth): add OAuth2 login support
fix(api): resolve null pointer in user endpoint
docs: update installation instructions
chore(deps): bump lodash to 4.17.21

feat(shopping-cart)!: remove deprecated calculate method

BREAKING CHANGE: calculate has been removed, use computeTotal instead

Ask for confirmation before committing if the changes are complex or span multiple concerns; otherwise just commit.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.