agentleFS
meyverickmeyverick/agentic/skills/pi-lens-write-ast-grep-rule/SKILL.md

pi-lens-write-ast-grep-rule

Skill0 starsChanged 15 days agoISCView on GitHub

Use when writing a new pi-lens ast-grep rule YAML file — covers schema, drop path, gotchas, and NAPI runner constraints

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Only error maps to semantic blocking and stops a turn.

    line 27
  2. Very specific:

    If the post-narrowing residual is still tens of legitimate hits, stop and report the numbers instead of shipping at error.

    line 54
  3. Very specific:

    Every relational suppression (a has/inside/not exclusion for a legitimate idiom) needs two fixtures per bound metavariable, not one:

    line 155

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Writing a pi-lens ast-grep Rule

Drop path: rules/ast-grep-rules/rules/<id>.yml
Same id as a built-in overrides it. Multiple rules per file: separate with ---.

Minimal template

id: no-foo-bar
language: TypeScript        # PascalCase — see languages below
severity: warning           # error | warning | hint | info — pick by evidence, see below
message: "Avoid foo.bar() — use baz() instead"
note: |
  Longer explanation / fix guidance here.
rule:
  pattern: foo.bar($ARG)

Pick the severity by the evidence behind the rule, not by feel:

  • error — only with a documented zero-false-positive audit in the note. Only error maps to semantic blocking and stops a turn.
  • warning — a real finding with a known, bounded false-positive rate.
  • hint / info — style opinions. They render as advisory text, never block, and lose the report budget to warnings when a report is capped.

Full policy and the error-promotion procedure: AGENTS.md's "Severity policy (#1777)" section. Read it before shipping anything above warning.

Before promoting to error

Three things must all be true, and the rule's note must record them:

  1. A multi-corpus false-positive census, not a single-tree count. Run the rule over pi-lens's clients//tests/ plus at least one real external codebase of the kind the rule targets, classify every hit, and put the table in the note.
  2. Structural narrowing before exemption. Suppress a legitimate idiom with a relational constraint (inside/has/follows, scoped path globs), not with prose telling readers to ignore the hit. Narrow first — don't reach for a lower tier as the easy way out. no-non-null-assertion was demoted to hint (0124608a), then reverted back to warning once the same false positives were closed with a structural exclusion instead (b3e1fd79).
  3. Self-scan wiring. Tag the rule metadata.category: pi-lens-self-scan so npm run astgrep:self-scan holds this tree at zero in CI. An error rule that never runs against pi-lens's own source is an unaudited claim.

If the post-narrowing residual is still tens of legitimate hits, stop and report the numbers instead of shipping at error.

Language values

TypeScript JavaScript Python Go Rust Java C Cpp CSharp Kotlin Ruby Php

Rule conditions

rule:
  pattern: foo($X)          # ast-grep pattern — $X single, $$$ARGS multi
  kind: call_expression     # AST node kind (alternative to pattern)
  regex: "secret|token"     # regex on node text
  has:                      # descendant must match
    pattern: await $$$
  not:
    kind: comment
  any:
    - pattern: foo($X)
    - pattern: bar($X)
  all:
    - pattern: $OBJ.send($$$)
    - not: { kind: await_expression }

Relational & constraint conditions — all supported (native napi, #206)

The runner matches every rule through napi's native engine (root.findAll({rule, constraints})), fed by a faithful js-yaml parse. The full ast-grep grammar works — nest freely; nothing is silently skipped:

rule:
  kind: call_expression
  inside:                     # ancestor must match
    kind: function_declaration
    stopBy: end               # ↑ search ALL ancestors (default is direct parent)
  has:                        # descendant must match (default: DIRECT child)
    field: arguments          # field constraints work
  follows:                    # immediately-preceding sibling
    pattern: const $X = $V
constraints:                  # metavariable regex constraints work
  X:
    regex: "Error$"

⚠ has/inside default to the immediate child/parent (stopBy: neighbor). For a recursive descendant/ancestor search add stopBy: end. This is the #1 migration gotcha — see the has note in reference.md.

⚠ stopBy: end alone is not a boundary. It's a search-depth control — how far the walk searches — not a stop condition; the any: kind list only decides what CAN satisfy the match, not where the walk halts. To scope a relation to the nearest enclosing function (or any other boundary), give stopBy its own rule. See "Scoping to the nearest enclosing X" in reference.md (#1794 F1 — this bug shipped twice in one window).

YAML quoting — REQUIRED (js-yaml will reject the rule otherwise)

The parser is a real YAML parser, so unquoted special chars throw and the rule is silently dropped:

❌ message: !!value to coerce boolean    # `!!` is a YAML tag → js-yaml THROWS, rule dropped
✅ message: "!!value to coerce boolean"
❌ message: foo: bar baz                  # bare `:` → parsed as a nested mapping
✅ message: "foo: bar baz"
   Quote any scalar starting with  ! & * ? | > % @ `  or containing  : #
   Quote keyword-like kinds:  kind: "true"   (bare `true` becomes a boolean → invalid kind)

Gotchas

❌ Overly broad patterns — filtered out automatically
   $VAR  $NAME  $_  $X  $EXPR  (single bare metavar)

❌ PascalCase language is required
   language: typescript  →  language: TypeScript

❌ $VAR inside strings — matches literal "$VAR", not a metavar
   "from $PATH"  →  use tree-sitter or grep instead

✅ Test in playground: https://ast-grep.github.io/playground.html
✅ Schema + autocomplete: rules/ast-grep-rules/rule-schema.json
✅ Docs: docs/custom-rules.md

Reference doc — read before writing a NAPI-runner-specific or hard-to-express rule

reference.md (same directory) covers: ReDoS-safe regex authoring, node-text string-escape quirks, has/inside stopBy defaults (and when to override them), scoping a relation to the nearest enclosing node with a stopBy boundary rule, the -js twin dedup behavior (#657), boolean-parameter matching across the TS/JS grammars, and precision-over-recall heuristics for denylist-shaped rules. Read it when a rule isn't matching (or over-matching) the way you expect, or before shipping a regex/has-heavy rule.

Testing a suppression

Every relational suppression (a has/inside/not exclusion for a legitimate idiom) needs two fixtures per bound metavariable, not one:

  1. A same-binding valid case — the idiom the exclusion is meant to suppress, with the metavariable bound consistently (same receiver, same key).
  2. A mutation-guard invalid case — the same shape with the binding broken: a different key, a different receiver, or a boundary-crossing lookalike (the guard lives in the wrong scope). This proves the exclusion checks the BINDING, not just the pattern's presence somewhere in the file.

rules/ast-grep-rules/rule-tests/no-non-null-assertion-test.yml is the model: alongside the get-after-has/pop-after-length valid cases, it fixtures a different-key guard, a different-map guard, and an outer-function guard that must NOT suppress an inner closure — each one red if the corresponding binding check is deleted.

Corpus silence is not evidence. A valve with zero corpus hits needs adversarial fixtures MORE, not less — redundant-unsafe-function targets Rust, so it has no pi-lens corpus to census against, and its # Safety valve still shipped an unbounded backward scan that over-suppressed real detections, caught only by adversarial fixtures in review (00284bcc). A documented blind spot (an idiom the rule knowingly can't distinguish from a bug) becomes an invalid-direction fixture with a comment naming the gap, never silence.

Regenerate the catalog doc with npm run docs:rule-catalogs after adding or changing a rule — never hand-edit the generated catalog.

Validating a candidate rule against the REAL engine (not the warm MCP cache)

Live-binary discipline (AGENTS.md shape 16) applies here too: verify parsing and match behavior against a real ast-grep run before you write it into a rule note or a test fixture — a hand-written fixture pins a guess, not a fact.


# inspect how a PATTERN parses → find the node kind you actually need

ast-grep run -p 'x = false' --lang ts --debug-query=cst file.ts

# match by kind (──kind and ──pattern are mutually exclusive in `run`)

ast-grep run --kind required_parameter --lang ts file.ts

# run ONE rule from an sgconfig against a sample

ast-grep scan -c <sgconfig.yml> --filter '^<id>$' sample.ts

# run the fixture harness for one rule

ast-grep test -c rules/ast-grep-rules/.sgconfig.yml --skip-snapshot-tests --filter '<id>'

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.