agentleFS
meteormeteor/agent-skills/skills/meteor-debugging/SKILL.md

meteor-debugging

Skill10 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when diagnosing an unexplained failure in a Meteor 3 application before the failing layer or fix is known. Triggers on server crashes, client-only errors, stuck subscriptions, DDP or WebSocket disconnects, Minimongo/server data mismatches, hanging or flaky tests, slow builds, --inspect, console.log, .only, Playwright traces, Instrumentation lifecycle events, or requests to debug a Meteor app. Use this skill when evidence must distinguish Meteor tool, server, client, data, test, browser, mobile, or production boundaries. For test setup and authoring use meteor-testing; after confirming a domain cause, hand the repair to the owning skill.

1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

14 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈10

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read existing evidence before adding instrumentation.

    line 37
  2. Distinctive:

    Add one targeted observation only when current evidence cannot answer the question.

    line 39
  3. Distinctive:

    If several evidence-backed hypotheses fail, revisit the boundary map and assumptions before stacking mitigations or widening the change.

    line 49
  4. Very specific:

    Treat console.log as temporary instrumentation.

    line 75
  5. Very specific:

    Use .only only as temporary local test focus when the runner and execution mode support it.

    line 80
  6. Distinctive:

    Prefer observable readiness over sleeps: subscription ready, settled method, expected document, visible UI, or a specific browser event.

    line 82
  7. Distinctive:

    Do not substitute source inspection for this browser evidence or omit the trace because the console or network already suggests a cause.

    line 93
  8. Distinctive:

    Use only an application path or URL the user placed in scope.

    line 95
  9. Very specific:

    Read through meteor shell and meteor mongo before mutating.

    line 98
  10. Very specific:

    Remove only the logs, debugger statements, .only markers, pauses, temporary routes, and debug settings added for this investigation.

    line 119
  11. Distinctive:

    Delete or protect screenshots, traces, profiles, saved browser state, and dumps according to their data sensitivity.

    line 121
  12. Distinctive:

    Add logs across the application without a hypothesis.

    line 131
  13. Distinctive:

    Treat a focused passing test as success when the suite still fails.

    line 134
  14. Distinctive:

    Add arbitrary sleeps, broad selectors, retries, or heap increases until the symptom disappears.

    line 135

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Debug Meteor applications

Find the first failing boundary before changing behavior. Produce a stable reproduction, evidence for one cause, and a verification target. Then use the skill that owns the repair.

Diagnosis loop

  1. Record the exact symptom, complete error and stack, command or user action, Meteor release, resolved Atmosphere and npm versions, environment, and last known working state.
  2. Reproduce with the narrowest stable command or action before editing.
  3. Classify the first uncertain boundary with the table below.
  4. Read existing evidence before adding instrumentation. Compare client and server output, recent changes, and passing versus failing environments.
  5. Add one targeted observation only when current evidence cannot answer the question. Do not combine a diagnostic change with a speculative fix.
  6. State one falsifiable hypothesis and the observation that would reject it.
  7. Change one variable, reproduce, and trace a bad value or event backward to its origin.
  8. Fix the confirmed cause through the owning skill. Add a regression at the lowest reliable layer when the failure can recur.
  9. Re-run the focused reproduction, then the affected suite or production-like check. Remove temporary diagnostics and artifacts.

If several evidence-backed hypotheses fail, revisit the boundary map and assumptions before stacking mitigations or widening the change.

Select the boundary

SymptomFirst evidenceRead
Build stalls, compilation error, rebuild regression, Rspack or SWC failureFull build output, --verbose, exact release and build-package versionsBuild debugging
Server crashes before startup or fails in a method, publication, job, or hookEarliest server stack, startup order, request-correlated evidenceRuntime and inspector
Client stack, stale render, reactive loop, or client/server disagreementBrowser stack, rendered state, reactive invalidation, server comparisonRuntime and inspector, then the React or Blaze skill
Missing documents, stuck subscription, reconnect, or proxy/WebSocket symptomServer query, publication output, DDP state, subscription readiness, MinimongoDDP and data
Current output cannot distinguish an entry, guard, branch, state change, or event orderA small set of redacted boundary observationsLogs and instrumentation
Meteor Mocha failure, suite-only failure, async flake, or browser E2E failureFull hook output, client/server test counts, existing report and traceTests and browser
Cordova or HCP problem, device-only failure, or live incidentDevice logs and versions; deployment logs, health, metrics, release diffMobile and production

A syntax error needs its stack, not browser tracing. A browser-only hydration race needs client evidence, not a server inspector. Use the smallest tool that can reject the current hypothesis.

Evidence rules

  • Label runtime side and operation in temporary logs. Include a request or event identifier only when concurrent flows can interleave.
  • Record selected, redacted fields. Never log credentials, tokens, cookies, authorization headers, private settings, unrestricted method arguments, or full user documents.
  • Treat console.log as temporary instrumentation. Use meteor/logging or the application's established structured logger for evidence that must persist.
  • For server lifecycle evidence on Meteor 3.6-beta.1 through beta.3, use the optional instrumentation package through Logs and instrumentation. Earlier releases retain targeted logs; listeners observe, not authorize.
  • Use .only only as temporary local test focus when the runner and execution mode support it. Remove it and run the broader suite before handoff.
  • Prefer observable readiness over sleeps: subscription ready, settled method, expected document, visible UI, or a specific browser event.
  • Inspect existing Playwright reports and traces before starting an interactive browser. For a playwright-cli request, first check whether the executable is available. If it is unavailable, obtain authority before installation or browser downloads. Explicitly report that availability result and request the authority rather than only asking for the application URL. Use it only for a real browser boundary.
  • For an authorized ad hoc playwright-cli reproduction: MUST run snapshot, console, and requests, start tracing before the failing action, stop tracing immediately after it, and close the browser session. Do not substitute source inspection for this browser evidence or omit the trace because the console or network already suggests a cause.
  • Use only an application path or URL the user placed in scope. If the current workspace has no app and the prompt gives no URL, ask for one. Do not scan unrelated directories, processes, or ports to discover an application.
  • Read through meteor shell and meteor mongo before mutating. Never use meteor reset --db as a diagnostic shortcut.
  • On production, do not expose an inspector, deploy a debug build, retain secret-bearing traces, or experiment on live data.

Handoffs

Confirmed causeContinue with
Test setup, design, driver, fixture, or new regression structuremeteor-testing
SWC, Rspack, watcher, cache, build graph, or generated handoffmeteor-modern-build-stack or migrate-to-rspack
Confirmed Cordova platform, native plugin/configuration, device networking, signing, or native HCP compatibilitymeteor-native
Method, publication, Mongo/Minimongo, React, Blaze, accounts, or securityMatching domain skill
Galaxy, container, proxy, environment, health check, or rolloutmeteor-deployment
Documented community package behaviormeteor-community-packages, then the upstream repository
Pure Node.js, browser, database, or runner failure with no Meteor boundaryGeneral debugging guidance

Cleanup

Before handoff:

  1. Remove only the logs, debugger statements, .only markers, pauses, temporary routes, and debug settings added for this investigation.
  2. Delete or protect screenshots, traces, profiles, saved browser state, and dumps according to their data sensitivity.
  3. Re-run the original reproduction and the affected suite.
  4. Report the confirmed cause, evidence, fix, verification, and any remaining uncertainty.

Anti-patterns

  • Edit the assertion before checking setup, async completion, and skipped client coverage.
  • Add logs across the application without a hypothesis.
  • Serialize every runtime object indiscriminately. Circular values, reactive wrappers, getters, binary data, and large documents need selected snapshots.
  • Treat a focused passing test as success when the suite still fails.
  • Add arbitrary sleeps, broad selectors, retries, or heap increases until the symptom disappears.
  • Install browser tooling or scaffold tests for a server, build, or database failure.

References

  • Runtime and inspector
  • Logs and instrumentation
  • Tests and browser
  • Build debugging
  • DDP and data
  • Mobile and production
  • Evaluation cases

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.