adversarial-ux-test
Skill38 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Test an app as a difficult, low-patience persona, then filter complaints into actionable UX issues.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- susantedit/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- susantedit/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository76 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- templates/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- 1passwordSkill
- api-debugSkill
- apple-notesSkill
- apple-remindersSkill
- authorized-web-pentestSkill
- bear-notesSkill
- birdSkill
- blogwatcherSkill
- blucliSkill
- bluebubblesSkill
- camsnapSkill
- Canvas SkillSkill
- clawdhubSkill
- cloudflare-temporary-deploySkill
- code-reviewSkill
- code-wikiSkill
- coding-agentSkill
- comfyuiSkill
- diagram-makerSkill
- discordSkill
- docker-managementSkill
- domain-intelSkill
- eightctlSkill
- excalidrawSkill
- fal.aiSkill
- fastmcpSkill
- food-orderSkill
- geminiSkill
- gifgrepSkill
- githubSkill
- gogSkill
- goplacesSkill
- himalayaSkill
- imsgSkill
- local-placesSkill
- mactopSkill
- manim-videoSkill
- mcporterSkill
- model-usageSkill
- nano-banana-proSkill
- nano-pdfSkill
- notionSkill
- obsidianSkill
- openai-image-genSkill
- openai-whisper-apiSkill
- openai-whisperSkill
- openhueSkill
- oracleSkill
- ordercliSkill
- oss-forensicsSkill
- peekabooSkill
- phoneSkill
- planSkill
- sagSkill
- session-logsSkill
- sherpa-onnx-ttsSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 9
Use this before demos, launches, onboarding changes, or major UI releases when the user wants friction found by a realistic hard-to-please …
- Distinctive: line 28
Write the persona rant:
- Distinctive: line 40
Test the core workflow before touring settings.
- Distinctive: line 41
Do not create more than 10 tickets.
- Distinctive: line 43
Do not turn "I hate computers" into product work unless it exposes a real accessibility or workflow issue.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Adversarial UX Test
Use this before demos, launches, onboarding changes, or major UI releases when the user wants friction found by a realistic hard-to-please persona.
Workflow
- Define one persona:
- Role, age range, technical comfort, core task, frustration triggers, and voice.
- Browse the app as that persona:
- First impression.
- Core workflow.
- Error recovery.
- Readability and accessibility.
- Speed and perceived effort.
- Terminology.
- Navigation and return paths.
- Record evidence:
- Screenshots for each major issue.
- Console errors.
- Network failures.
- Click count for the core task.
- Write the persona rant:
- In character, with concrete quotes and page references.
- Apply the pragmatism filter:
- Red: real UX bug.
- Yellow: valid but lower priority.
- Green: feature request with strong value.
- White: persona noise.
- Produce tickets only for Red and Green items.
Rules
- One persona per session.
- Test the core workflow before touring settings.
- Do not create more than 10 tickets.
- Separate entertaining persona feedback from objective product findings.
- Do not turn "I hate computers" into product work unless it exposes a real accessibility or workflow issue.
Report Shape
Persona: <name and constraints>
Task: <core task>
Verdict: <would they keep using it?>
Persona feedback:
- "<quote>" - <what happened>
Filtered findings:
- RED: <issue, evidence, suggested fix>
- YELLOW: <issue>
- GREEN: <request>
- WHITE: <noise>
Tickets:
- <title> - <evidence> - <fix>Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

