reddit-research
Skill0 starsChanged 16 days agoMITView on GitHub
Find out what real people say about a product, brand, competitor or problem on Reddit. Searches posts, finds the communities that discuss it, reads the most-discussed threads and their comments, then reports the pains, wants, objections, alternatives and exact phrases people use, with links. Use for voice-of-customer and market research, product validation, brand monitoring, "what does Reddit think of X", or before posting in a subreddit.
- Reads credentials
7 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- selamy-labs/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ethosagent/ethostheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- agentbody/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- lignertys/reddit-research-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 15, 2026
- XPOZpublic/xpoz-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 9, 2026
- Ritik-bhaiya/reddit-research-skillstheir own version, first seen Apr 2, 2026
Other versions7 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 7
- lignertys/reddit-research-skills★ 691same name
- ethosagent/ethos★ 22same name
- Ritik-bhaiya/reddit-research-skills★ 15same name
- XPOZpublic/xpoz-agent-skills★ 15same name
- Aditya923-c/xpoz-agent-skills★ 6same name
- agentbody/skills★ 1same name
- selamy-labs/agent-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.
- ad-researchSkill
- creator-vettingSkill
- demand-researchSkill
- lurkapiSkill
- lurkSkill
- video-transcriptsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 39
Read for these, and count how many threads each theme shows up in:
- Distinctive: line 74
Search covers post titles and text, not comments: phrase queries the way people title posts.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Reddit research
What people really say about something when they aren't talking to the brand: their problems, what they've tried, what they recommend and the words they use. Every finding links to the thread it came from.
<!-- lurkapi:access -->Calling LurkAPI
With MCP (the LurkAPI plugin or connector), call the tools by name, like tiktok_profile; your client may prefix them (mcp__plugin_lurkapi_lurkapi__tiktok_profile). With only find_endpoints and call_endpoint, run a tool as call_endpoint with endpoint set to its name and params to its arguments. Results come trimmed: no nulls, one URL per image or video. A long result comes in parts: its _note gives the offset for the next part, which is free.
Without MCP (Codex, Cursor, scripts), every tool is GET https://api.lurkapi.com plus its path, with the same params as a query string (URL-encoded) and the key from LURKAPI_API_KEY in the x-api-key header:
curl -s "https://api.lurkapi.com/v1/tiktok/profile?handle=nike" -H "x-api-key: $LURKAPI_API_KEY"If LURKAPI_API_KEY isn't set but LURKAPI_KEY is (the name older docs used), use that. Raw answers are big: pipe them through jq to keep the fields you need. No key yet? Ask the user to create one at https://lurkapi.com/dashboard (100 free credits on sign-up, then a balance below 25 tops back up to 25 every day) and to set LURKAPI_API_KEY in their shell. Never ask for the key in the chat, and never print it.
Credits. Each call costs what the table at the end says, not_found included; failures on our side (5xx) are free. Every answer carries credits_remaining. Before a run of more than 20 calls, check the balance with account_credit_balance (free) and tell the user what the run will cost. If a call answers missing_api_key, insufficient_credits or signup_required, stop and pass on what it says.
<!-- /lurkapi:access -->Run
- Search wide. Start with the plain name:
reddit_search(query=<topic>, timeframe=year). Then one or two more phrasings, each short: the problem in the user's words ("<problem>recommendations"), "<competitor>alternative", "<x>vs<y>". Long queries, OR, andsort=comment_countdrag in megathreads that only mention a word; drop any result whose title isn't about the topic. Results havetitle,subreddit,score,num_comments,created_at_isoandpermalink, but no body text. Note which communities keep coming up.sort=topfinds the classics;sort=newwithtimeframe=monthwhat's current. - Go where it's discussed. In the one or two communities that recur,
reddit_subreddit_search(subreddit=<name>, query=<topic>, sort=comments)finds the most argued-over threads. To size one up, or before posting there,reddit_subreddit_details(subreddit=<name>)givesweekly_active_usersand itsrules. - Read the threads. Pick 5 to 10 by
num_commentsand relevance, not score alone.reddit_post_comments(url=<thread url>, trim=true)returns the post (post.title,post.selftext) and its comments, best first, with replies nested. The thread URL is https://www.reddit.com plus the search result'spermalink(subreddit search results carry a fullurl). Whenmore.has_moreis true on a rich thread,more.next_cursorascursorloads the next batch. - Write it up (below).
Budget
Three searches and eight threads is about 11 calls; a deep look at one community adds two or three. Stay under about 25 calls unless the user wants more, and say so before going further.
What to pull out
Read for these, and count how many threads each theme shows up in:
- Pains: what people are stuck on, in their words.
- What they've tried: products and workarounds named, and what they liked or hated about each.
- Recommendations: what the community steers people toward, and why.
- Objections: price, trust, switching cost, missing features.
- Triggers: what made someone go looking.
- Language: phrases that recur, worth reusing in copy.
Report
# Reddit research: <topic>, <date>
<n> threads read across r/<a>, r/<b>, … from <searches run>.
## Themes
| Theme | Threads | Representative quote |
| --- | --- | --- |
## Alternatives people mention
| Product | Said for it | Said against it |
## Exact phrases
- "<verbatim>" ([thread](<url>))
## What this means
3 to 5 takeaways for the user's goal.
## Sources
- [<thread title>](<url>), r/<subreddit>, <score> points, <comments> commentsPitfalls
- Search covers post titles and text, not comments: phrase queries the way people title posts.
- A loud thread is one sample. Report how many threads a theme appears in, not just the best quote.
- Upvotes measure agreement in that community, not the market.
- Quote content, not people: link threads and leave usernames out unless the user needs them.
- Deleted and removed posts answer
not_found, and still cost a call.
<!-- lurkapi:calls -->Calls and credits
| Tool | REST path | Credits |
reddit_search | /v1/reddit/search | 1 credit |
reddit_subreddit_search | /v1/reddit/subreddit/search | 1 credit |
reddit_subreddit_details | /v1/reddit/subreddit/details | 1 credit |
reddit_post_comments | /v1/reddit/post/comments | 1 credit |
Each tool's link opens its docs as markdown: every param and its values, and a real response.
<!-- /lurkapi:calls -->Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

