agentleFS
Sign inStart free
meaningfy-wsmeaningfy-ws/skillery/skills/proposal-writing/SKILL.md

proposal-writing

Skill2 starsChanged 17 days agoGPL-3.0View on GitHub

Produce the proposal + Statement of Work (SoW) that frames the paid Proof of Value offer — with an explicit in/out scope boundary, priced as a fixed frame. It frames the Proof of Value offer for a qualified need (qualification is `sales-qualification`), prices it (delegating the numbers to `estimation`), and writes the proposal + SoW. It OWNS proposal/SoW production and the scope-boundary discipline; it DELEGATES pricing/effort to `estimation`, executive framing to `executive-communication`, and the Proof of Value deliverable definition to `decision-package`. Triggers — \"write a proposal\", \"draft the SoW / Statement of Work\", \"scope boundary for this engagement\", \"fixed-cost proposal\", \"frame the Proof of Value offer\". Not for producing the Decision Package itself (that is `decision-package`), not for free presale (that is `semantic-consulting-coach`).

3 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

Licensed with conditions — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free