redivis
Skill12 starsChanged 19 days agoMITView on GitHub
Practical playbook for any work with Redivis — creating/versioning datasets, tabular and raw-file (index table) uploads, org tokens and scopes, the python/R clients and REST quirks, releases, and linking/referencing datasets correctly. Use whenever a session touches Redivis (uploading data, building or extending a dataset, scripting against the API, debugging auth/upload/version errors, writing docs that link to datasets) and the task is NOT the shiny→datapage site migration — that pattern has its own skill (shiny-to-datapage), which pairs with this one.
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- adversarial-protocol-reviewSkill
- babyview-datasetSkill
- cdi-vocabulary-dataSkill
- cran-safe-releaseSkill
- gcp-large-stanSkill
- pre-submission-reviewSkill
- psis-loo-chunkedSkill
- quarto-bookSkill
- remote-vm-gotchasSkill
- reproducibility-auditSkill
- rmd-qmd-manuscript-collabSkill
- shiny-to-datapageSkill
- stan-mixing-cold-startSkill
- wordbankSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 30
Every dataset/table has a short reference code (babyview_imu:e7we, recordings:vzmc).
- Very specific: line 34
Always build permalinks with the reference code, e.g.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Redivis playbook
Battle-tested on: wordbank/childes-db/peekbank staging (2026) and the BabyView
IMU archive (Aug 2026; reference implementation with all patterns working:
~/Projects/babyview-redivis — manifest → download+scan → stage/verify/release).
Mental model
Dataset → versions (immutable released snapshots + at most one next
draft) → tables (tabular, or file index for raw files) → uploads/files.
Any data change requires a new version; metadata (description, labels) can be
edited on released datasets. Version tags are auto-assigned minor bumps
(v1.0, v1.1, …) — you don't choose them, so keep your own source-release↔tag
map (JSON in the repo + restate in each version's release notes).
Referencing & links (recurring gotcha)
- Every dataset/table has a short reference code (
babyview_imu:e7we,recordings:vzmc). Name-only references work but break on rename and make the python client print warnings; use the qualifiedname:codeform in code. - Dataset links in text/docs: name-based URLs to org datasets don't work.
Always build permalinks with the reference code, e.g.
https://redivis.com/datasets/datapages.babyview_imu:e7we— not…/datasets/datapages.babyview_imu. Get the code from the API (qualifiedReference) or the dataset page URL. - Version-pinned reference:
owner.name:code:v1_2(tags print asv1_4, resolve as"v1.4").
Auth & scopes
- Token in env
REDIVIS_API_TOKEN(keep in a gitignored.secrets, formatREDIVIS_API_TOKEN=…). The python client silently prefers env over cached OAuth. - Scopes bite in two places:
organization.readto list/release org datasets,organization.writeto create datasets in an org — a token that lists org datasets fine can still 403insufficient_scopeon create. Personal-workspace token UIs may not offer org scopes; mint from the org. - Symptom pattern: 403 with
insufficient_scope= wrong token scopes; 400Cannot modify data on a released version= you targeted a released version instead of the draft (see below).
The draft-targeting rule (python)
Once ANY version is released, the default dataset reference resolves to the released version and rejects writes. All staging operations must target the draft explicitly:
ds = redivis.organization("org").dataset("name:code")
ds.create_next_version(if_not_exists=True) # no-ops if draft already open
draft = redivis.organization("org").dataset("name:code", version="next")
tb = draft.table("mytable") # write via THIS, not ds.table()This bug is invisible on a brand-new dataset (everything is the draft until the first release) and appears only when staging version 2.
Tabular uploads
table.create(upload_merge_strategy="replace")does not take effect — calltb.update(upload_merge_strategy="replace")every run, or a re-release silently DOUBLES the data. Uploads within one version COMBINE.- With replace strategy, a table with NO new upload in a version silently keeps the previous version's rows — stage an explicit empty upload if a table should be empty.
tb.upload(name).create(path, type="delimited", replace_on_conflict=True, wait_for_finish=True, raise_on_fail=True). Redivis normalizes upload names — compare on alphanumerics when checking "already uploaded".- Type inference from CSV is good: ISO dates → date,
true/false→ boolean (write lowercase), empty strings → NULL. VerifynumRowsandlist_variables()after upload. - Big data: compact to few large files first (thousands of small uploads =
seconds of API overhead each); parquet needs
min_rows_per_groupset or you hit the 32,767-row-groups cap ("ordinal 32768 exceeds i16 max").
Raw files (file index tables)
table.create(is_file_index=True), thentable.add_files(files=[{"path":…, "name":…, "size":…}, …])(ordirectory=). Internally parallel (cpu×5) and batched; limits 100M files / 5 TB per file.- Index rows:
file_id,file_name,size,added_at,md5_hash— md5_hash is base64; convert (base64.b64decode(v).hex()) before comparing to hex md5s (GCS etc.). This enables true end-to-end checksum verification source → local → Redivis. - Bulk
add_filescan die mid-run with 403s on signed temp-upload URLs ("Upload failed after N retries"). Design resumable: list draft index rows, skip present names, chunk uploads (~1000/call), rerun on failure. - New versions carry forward existing files;
add_fileson the draft adds only the new ones.
Reading / REST quirks (python client)
- Rows endpoint:
make_api_request(method="GET", path=f"{table.uri}/rows", query={"maxResults": N}, parse_response=False)returns arequests.Response(use.text), NDJSON lines, typed values. - The /rows endpoint 500s on an empty file-index table — check
table.get()→numRowsfirst, and only treat empty as empty when numRows==0; never swallow errors into "no files" (causes duplicate re-uploads or vacuous verification). - Releases take minutes to propagate for large tables — a read right after
release()can 404 at the previous version; retry. - Pin versions (
dataset(name, version="v1.4")) in anything reproducible.
Release discipline
- Two-phase always: stage draft → verify draft against a manifest (row
counts; for files: name set + sizes + md5s) → release only on PASS.
Releases are the near-irreversible step (
unrelease()exists for the latest version, but treat it as an escape hatch). ds.release(release_notes=…)— put the source-release name and coverage caveats in the notes.- Dataset
descriptionis capped at 2,000 chars; longer docs go in the UI Documentation section (no API in the python client) or the repo. - Deletion of a whole dataset is possible while private; think before releasing public.
R client / CI (brief — see shiny-to-datapage for depth)
Org-scoped token needed for API releases; LIBARROW_BINARY=true +
NOT_CRAN=true on CI or arrow compiles ~2 h; redivis-r isn't on CRAN (
Suggests + r-universe); beware the binary-bake trap (OAuth cache path baked
at build time into binaries). Full detail: shiny-to-datapage skill and
~/Projects/shiny-to-observable-advice.md.
Where the R client differs from the python one above (verified Aug 2026,
staging the acceleration fit archive):
- Namespace form:
redivis$organization("org")$dataset("name:code"). The olderredivis::organization(...)still works but warns. - Methods are invisible to
names()— that returns fields only, so an object looks empty. The classes are R6 (verified redivis 0.12.12, Sep 2026; the older$methods()recipe errors with "attempt to apply non-function"). Enumerate withnames(get("Table", envir = asNamespace("redivis"))$public_methods), and walk parents with$get_inherit()— many methods are inherited:download_files(),list_files()andto_data_frame()live on the parentTabularReader, not onTable. Signatures viaformals(gen$public_methods$download_files). - Downloading a file-index table:
tb$download_files(path = dir)writes every file flat intodir(names only, no subdirectories) — route files afterwards if your code expects a tree. Auth:REDIVIS_API_TOKENif set (the client warns this is discouraged in interactive sessions), otherwise an OAuth device-login on first use. - Draft targeting, R form of the python rule above:
ds$create_next_version() # errors if a draft is open draft <- redivis$organization("org")$dataset("name:code", version = "next") tb <- draft$table("mytable") # write via THIS after v1 exists list_files()returns File refs carrying onlykind,id,uri— no name, so it cannot answer "is this file already uploaded". Read the index table itself instead:tb$to_data_frame(max_results = 2e5)givesfile_id, file_name, size, added_at, md5_hash. That is also what makes a resumable uploader possible in R.- Verify on md5, not row count. A matching
numRowsonly proves the right NUMBER of files arrived. The index md5 is base64; in R,paste(sprintf("%02x", as.integer(openssl::base64_decode(v))), collapse="")converts it for comparison withtools::md5sum(). add_files()prints curl noise while succeeding. Broken-pipe and "HTTP2 framing layer" errors scroll past on a slow link and the call still returns normally with every file uploaded. Never read those as failure, and never read their absence as success — verify md5s either way. Chunking (~400 files) plus a retry loop plus the skip-what-is-present check above makes a multi-hundred-MB upload survive a flaky connection.
Trap: re-uploading a table into an existing unreleased version appends
upload_merge_strategy = "replace" only supersedes the previous released
version's rows. Two uploads into the same unreleased ("next") version are
combined, so re-uploading a corrected table doubles it (wordbank NEXT,
2026-09-15: datasets went 180 → 360). To rebuild a table within a version:
for (u in tb$list_uploads()) u$delete() first, then upload. Verify with a
SELECT COUNT(*) on `org.dataset:ref:next.table` afterwards — the
table page's row count lags. Query references for an unreleased version use
the literal next; released ones use the tag with _ (v2_0).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

