agentleFS
mcarmona1064-cellmcarmona1064-cell/clawbridge-codex/AGENTS.md

clawbridge-codex

AGENTS.md1 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

These principles govern how the AI assistant behaves when working on this codebase.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

21 rules. About 0 are common, 17 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈17

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If something goes sideways, STOP and re-plan immediately — don't keep pushing

    line 9
  2. Distinctive:

    Use plan mode for verification steps, not just building

    line 10
  3. Distinctive:

    Write detailed specs upfront to reduce ambiguity

    line 11
  4. Distinctive:

    Use subagents liberally to keep main context window clean

    line 14
  5. Very specific:

    After ANY correction from the user: update tasks/lessons.md with the pattern

    line 20
  6. Distinctive:

    Write rules for yourself that prevent the same mistake

    line 21
  7. Distinctive:

    Never mark a task complete without proving it works

    line 26
  8. Distinctive:

    Ask yourself: "Would a staff engineer approve this?"

    line 28
  9. Distinctive:

    Run tests, check logs, demonstrate correctness

    line 29
  10. Distinctive:

    If a fix feels hacky: "Knowing everything I know now, implement the elegant solution"

    line 33
  11. Distinctive:

    When given a bug report: just fix it.

    line 38
  12. Distinctive:

    Never pivot or pause a running task when a new request comes in

    line 44
  13. Distinctive:

    Treat new instructions as additive, never as replacements

    line 45
  14. Distinctive:

    When a new task arrives mid-work: spawn a subagent to handle it in parallel — do not touch the original task

    line 46
  15. Distinctive:

    Never say "pivoting," "switching to," or "I'll come back to this"

    line 47
  16. Distinctive:

    Default to parallel. Run tasks sequentially only when one truly depends on another's output

    line 49
  17. Distinctive:

    When unsure, assume independence and parallelize

    line 50
  18. Very specific:

    Plan First: Write plan to tasks/todo.md with checkable items

    line 56
  19. Distinctive:

    Verify Plan: Check in before starting implementation

    line 57
  20. Very specific:

    Document Results: Add review section to tasks/todo.md

    line 60
  21. Very specific:

    Capture Lessons: Update tasks/lessons.md after corrections

    line 61

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md

ClawBridge Agent — AI Operating Principles

These principles govern how the AI assistant behaves when working on this codebase.


1. Plan Node Default

  • Enter plan mode for ANY non-trivial task (3+ steps or architectural decisions)
  • If something goes sideways, STOP and re-plan immediately — don't keep pushing
  • Use plan mode for verification steps, not just building
  • Write detailed specs upfront to reduce ambiguity

2. Subagent Strategy

  • Use subagents liberally to keep main context window clean
  • Offload research, exploration, and parallel analysis to subagents
  • For complex problems, throw more compute at it via subagents
  • One task per subagent for focused execution

3. Self-Improvement Loop

  • After ANY correction from the user: update tasks/lessons.md with the pattern
  • Write rules for yourself that prevent the same mistake
  • Ruthlessly iterate on these lessons until mistake rate drops
  • Review lessons at session start for relevant project

4. Verification Before Done

  • Never mark a task complete without proving it works
  • Diff behavior between main and your changes when relevant
  • Ask yourself: "Would a staff engineer approve this?"
  • Run tests, check logs, demonstrate correctness

5. Demand Elegance (Balanced)

  • For non-trivial changes: pause and ask "is there a more elegant way?"
  • If a fix feels hacky: "Knowing everything I know now, implement the elegant solution"
  • Skip this for simple, obvious fixes — don't over-engineer
  • Challenge your own work before presenting it

6. Autonomous Bug Fixing

  • When given a bug report: just fix it. Don't ask for hand-holding
  • Point at logs, errors, failing tests — then resolve them
  • Zero context switching required from the user
  • Go fix failing CI tests without being told how

7. Parallel Execution Directive

  • Never pivot or pause a running task when a new request comes in
  • Treat new instructions as additive, never as replacements
  • When a new task arrives mid-work: spawn a subagent to handle it in parallel — do not touch the original task
  • Never say "pivoting," "switching to," or "I'll come back to this"
  • Briefly confirm: "Parallel subagent started for [new task]; [original] continues"
  • Default to parallel. Run tasks sequentially only when one truly depends on another's output
  • When unsure, assume independence and parallelize

Task Management

  1. Plan First: Write plan to tasks/todo.md with checkable items
  2. Verify Plan: Check in before starting implementation
  3. Track Progress: Mark items complete as you go
  4. Explain Changes: High-level summary at each step
  5. Document Results: Add review section to tasks/todo.md
  6. Capture Lessons: Update tasks/lessons.md after corrections

Core Principles

  • Simplicity First: Make every change as simple as possible. Impact minimal code.
  • No Laziness: Find root causes. No temporary fixes. Senior developer standards.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.