agentleFS
mblaubergmblauberg/provenant/skills/skill-craft/SKILL.md

skill-craft

Skill1 starsChanged 5 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use to audit an Agent Skill's triggers, overlap, token cost and fixtures (read-only), or to create or materially revise one under an authority grant. Not for delivering the change (implement) or measuring model quality (evaluate).

4 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Follow the target repository's authoring rules in its AGENTS.md, CONTRIBUTING and runbooks, where present.

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    Audit (default): Read-only assessment of an existing skill.

    line 20
  3. Distinctive:

    Baseline first: Run the target task without the skill, or with the previous version.

    line 36
  4. Distinctive:

    Front-load the description: Put the trigger terms and nearest exclusion early.

    line 42
  5. Distinctive:

    Contract tests: only for invariants a script or CI gate enforces.

    line 48
  6. Distinctive:

    Prefer 2026 sources and mark older ones as possibly stale.

    line 62

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Skill craft

A skill is a reusable, triggerable procedure. Judge it on four pillars: trigger (which requests load it, and which must not), structure (contracts and progressive disclosure), steering (the few bright-line rules a fresh agent would otherwise miss) and pruning (sediment, duplication, sprawl and no-ops).

Follow the target repository's authoring rules in its AGENTS.md, CONTRIBUTING and runbooks, where present. Keep project policy there rather than copying it into this skill.

Pick a branch

  • Audit (default). Read-only assessment of an existing skill. Follow references/audit.md.
  • Author. A new skill, or a material revision, under an authority grant that names implement as the action owner. Follow references/author.md.

With no authoring request, audit. An audit that finds defects reports them. It does not fix them without the grant.

How it runs

  • Audit with provenant run --use explore --route junior --over skill-a,skill-b --file work.toml --explain; synthesise the evidence.
  • Rewrite with provenant run --use batch --file work.toml --explain, disjoint scopes and one integration branch; bind worktree and write_scope in the document.

Working rules

  • Baseline first. Run the target task without the skill, or with the previous version. Keep only the lines the baseline gets wrong, and delete any line it already satisfies. Record the with-and-without difference as reviewer evidence. Scores are advisory.
  • Name failures by mechanism: premature completion, duplication, sediment, sprawl, no-op or negation-only.
  • Front-load the description. Put the trigger terms and nearest exclusion early. The exclusion names the skill to use instead, because a bare negation does not route.
  • Fixtures. Include near-miss negatives whose expected routes omit the target skill. Re-run them after any routing-text change, using the target repository's fixture policy and tooling where provided.
  • Contract tests only for invariants a script or CI gate enforces. Never assert wording.
  • Dated versions. Version facts go in a dated reference.
  • Hard rules in SKILL.md. Load depth from references one hop away, and load it late.
  • Write rules as mechanism, reason and example, phrased positively.
  • Project skills that only point at a global skill are redundant. A project skill keeps only the repo judgement no doc holds, states its own hard rules, and lists each departure under Project overrides:.
  • Provenance. Copied or closely paraphrased third-party text needs its source URL, commit, retrieval date and licence, with the notice kept.

Evidence

Prefer 2026 sources and mark older ones as possibly stale. The dated research basis is in references/audit.md.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.