pr-triage
Skill1 starsChanged 12 days agoMITView on GitHub
Triage open GitHub pull requests across one or all mazze93 repos by *what kind of stuck* they are (merge conflict, failing CI, changes requested, awaiting review, abandoned, ready-to-merge, healthy) rather than just sorting by age. Use when asked to "triage PRs", "what PRs need attention", "find stuck/stale/abandoned PRs", "which PRs are ready to merge", or to generate a PR status report for terminal, Slack, or a GitHub comment/markdown file.
21 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- salvo8519/fairmarktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- nesquena/steward-ostheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- redhat-developer/rhdhtheir own version, first seen Nov 2, 2026
- Python-roborock/python-roborocktheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- AcKeskin/contexturetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- edloidas/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use aeon-update, auto-workflow and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
aaronjmarsSkillaeon-update
Pull framework updates from the upstream Aeon repo into this instance - 3-way merges canon's new commits into a PR, never clobbering operator config.
Also in 4 projects that use this
aaronjmarsSkillauto-workflow
Two-mode aeon.yml workflow builder - analyze inspects URLs and emits a tiered, signal-verified skill-enablement plan plus an aeon.yml diff; enable flips slugs to enabled:true and opens a PR.
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +10 more from aaronjmars
Other versions21 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 21
- rtk-ai/rtk★ 86ksame name
- toss/es-toolkit★ 11ksame name
- aaronjmars/aeon★ 789same name
- aeonfun/aeon★ 789same name
- Python-roborock/python-roborock★ 247same name
- OutThisLife/brooklyn-skills★ 207same name
- redhat-developer/rhdh★ 172same name
- FlorianBruniaux/ccboard★ 94same name
- nesquena/steward-os★ 76same name
- aaronjmars/miroshark-aeon★ 20same name
11 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository28 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- claude-md-auditSkill
- cloudflare-oneSkill
- cloudflareSkill
- component-factorySkill
- concurrency-probeSkill
- core-sampleSkill
- corroborateSkill
- decision-telemetrySkill
- disk-auditSkill
- engramSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- git-forensicsSkill
- high-signal-engineSkill
- local-swarmSkill
- model-inventorySkill
- muster-triageSkill
- precise-coding-assistantSkill
- preflightSkill
- read-arxiv-paperSkill
- run-mazze-leczzare-blogSkill
- session-journalSkill
- shipSkill
- stratum-project-initSkill
- touchstoneSkill
- transcript-handoffSkill
- web-perfSkill
- workspace-syncSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 18 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 43
Every PR gets exactly one StuckType (see classify.py for the precedence order — conflict and CI blockers are checked before review state):
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 18 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
pr-triage
What this is
run-pr-triage.sh discovers every mazze93 repo with at least one open PR, classifies each PR by why it's stuck (not just how old it is), and prints a report. The point is actor-oriented triage: every stuck PR is tagged with who needs to act next (author, reviewer, ci, or nobody/unknown), so the output is a to-do list, not just a status board.
Usage
skills/pr-triage/run-pr-triage.sh # terminal report (default)
skills/pr-triage/run-pr-triage.sh --render slack # Slack Block Kit JSON — pipe to a webhook
skills/pr-triage/run-pr-triage.sh --render github # GitHub-flavored markdown — post as a PR comment
skills/pr-triage/run-pr-triage.sh --output report.md # write to a file instead of stdoutRequires gh (authenticated) and python3 on PATH — both are checked up front and the script fails fast with an install/auth hint if either is missing.
run-pr-triage.sh auto-discovers repos: it lists every repo under mazze93, keeps only the ones with open PRs, and builds a temp config on the fly — no setup needed for the common case. To scope a run to specific repos instead, invoke the Python entry point directly with your own config:
PYTHONPATH=skills/pr-triage python3 skills/pr-triage/pr_triage.py --config path/to/config.json --render terminalConfig JSON shape (repos is the only required field):
{
"repos": ["mazze93/some-repo", "mazze93/another-repo"],
"reviewer_response_hours": 48,
"abandon_days": 5,
"staleness_warning_days": 3,
"render": "terminal"
}Classification taxonomy
Every PR gets exactly one StuckType (see classify.py for the precedence order — conflict and CI blockers are checked before review state):
| StuckType | Meaning | Who acts |
ABANDONED | No activity for abandon_days (default 5) | unclear — triage ownership first |
BLOCKED_ON_CONFLICT | Merge conflicts | author (rebase) |
BLOCKED_ON_CI | Failing checks | author (investigate) |
BLOCKED_ON_AUTHOR | Changes requested, no new commits since | author |
BLOCKED_ON_REVIEWER | Awaiting review past reviewer_response_hours (default 48h) | reviewer (ping) |
READY_TO_MERGE | Approved, CI green, no conflicts | nobody — merge it |
HEALTHY | Active, no blockers yet | nobody |
Severity (HIGH/MEDIUM) escalates once a PR has been stuck past staleness_warning_days (default 3). The terminal report's "Needs Action" section surfaces HIGH-severity PRs first.
Architecture
fetch.py— talks to GitHub viagh pr list(parallel across repos,ThreadPoolExecutor), normalizes intoPRData. No classification logic here.classify.py— pure functions, no I/O:PRData+TriageConfigin,PRClassificationout. This is where the taxonomy above is actually implemented; extend it here if you need a new stuck type.render.py— three renderers (render_terminal,render_slack,render_github) over the samePRClassificationlist; presentation only, never re-derives classification.pr_triage.py— CLI entry point: config loading, preflight (gh/python3/auth checks), orchestration, output delivery.run-pr-triage.sh— the actual entry point for day-to-day use; wrapspr_triage.pywith automatic repo discovery so there's no config file to maintain.
Partial failures are non-fatal: if gh pr list fails for one repo, fetch_all logs a warning and continues with the rest.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

