task
Skill1 starsChanged 8 days agoMITView on GitHub
Drive one Jira task from a verified brief through spec, plan, per-repository dev sessions, an integration check and the push. Runs as the first turn of a task session opened by /rabbit:pull, or on its own with a Jira key or URL. Use when the user asks to work on, start or resume a Jira task (for example "work on ABC-123").
30 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- mdiri-ai/SoduWorktheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- nmamano/isomuxtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ToolJet/ToolJettheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Beskars-Code/Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- Gabriel-Lafrance/Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- denolfe/dotfilestheir own version, first seen Nov 2, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use inbox, grill-me and 4 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
kv0906Skillinbox
Quick capture mode (with content) or batch processing mode (no content). GTD-style routing of inbox items to proper folders. Use "/inbox thought to capture" or "/inbox" to process.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkillgrill-me
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.
Also in 5 projects that use this
OpenAISkillaudit
Audit or critique a product flow, journey, workflow, funnel, onboarding path, checkout path, settings path, screen, or multi-step product experience by capturing screenshots first, then reporting UX, design, and accessibility findings inline from that evidence. Use Figma only when the user explicitly asks for a board. Use when the user asks to audit, review, critique, inspect, assess, analyze, evaluate, or give feedback on a product experience.
Also in 3 projects that use this
BlockSkillplan
Draft a TDD, PRD, or lightweight plan in the conversation without committing it.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Google CloudSkilltriage
Gather context on a change or bug and plan the implementation.
Also in 3 projects that use this
SentrySkillreview
Fixture review skill.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions30 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 30
- ToolJet/ToolJet★ 41ksame name
- codeaholicguy/ai-devkit★ 1.7ksame name
- mdiri-ai/SoduWork★ 930same name
- me2resh/apexyard★ 542same name
- Gh61/lovelace-hue-like-light-card★ 392same name
- Achuan-2/siyuan-plugin-task-note-management★ 227same name
- mweinbach/agent-coworker★ 157same name
- denolfe/dotfiles★ 88same name
- lsnackerman/raw-clauding-skills★ 45same name
- nmamano/isomux★ 43same name
20 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 12 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 25 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
12
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 16
Desktop: If no mcp__ccd_session__start_session tool exists (loaded or deferred), send error.desktop-only (in the user's language) and stop.
- Very specific: line 18
Profile: Read ~/.config/rabbit/profile.md.
- Very specific: line 30
Workflow: If the profile has a Workflow: line, run PY -I "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/workflow.py" <path> (PY: rules.md).
- Distinctive: line 82
Read the issue: the profile's issue tool with every field that has a value (description, comments, custom fields, links, attachments), and …
- Very specific: line 90
Write TASK_DIR/brief.md following references/brief-format.md, then run references/review.md on it (Kind brief).
- Very specific: line 99
No result: ask.repo-missing.
- Very specific: line 110
Add what NOTE changes to brief.md.
- Very specific: line 118
Read each repository's CLAUDE.md and the .claude/rules/ files the task touches.
- Very specific: line 123
If gh works: gh pr list --repo <owner>/<repo> --state all --search <KEY> for each listed repository on GitHub.
- Very specific: line 125
Run references/discovery.md: it writes impact.md.
- Very specific: line 126
Add 2.2 and 2.3 to TASK_DIR/jira.md (rewrite it with the Write tool.
- Very specific: line 148
Run Discovery again on the draft (update ## Impact and contracts if impact.md changed), then references/review.md (Kind spec), then send …
- Very specific: line 167
Run references/review.md (Kind plan), then send ask.plan-approval and wait ({{execute_line}} from step 5.1.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 25 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Task
This session is the task's coordinator: it owns brief.md, jira.md,
spec.md, plan.md, impact.md and integration.md in the task folder and
never edits repository code. Read references/rules.md now and apply it in
every step. Read other references only in the step that names them.
0. Before anything
- Desktop. If no
mcp__ccd_session__start_sessiontool exists (loaded or deferred), senderror.desktop-only(in the user's language) and stop. - Profile. Read
~/.config/rabbit/profile.md. If it is missing or unreadable, or a required value is empty (Basics: Workspace, Repositories folder, Chat language, Document language; Tracker: Site, Tools), sendsetup.needednaming what is missing, run therabbit:setupskill with the Skill tool, and when it finishes continue here. - Language.
LANG= Chat language, or forautothe language of the last message the user typed (not a prompt Rabbit generated; English if none).DOC_LANG= Document language, orLANGforauto. Every message stays inLANG, even after text in another language. Send fixed messages fromreferences/messages.mdby id, translated; keep Markdown,{{...}}values, paths, keys and commands as they are. A clear yes in any language ("evet") approves; anything else does not. - Workflow. If the profile has a
Workflow:line, runPY -I "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/workflow.py" <path>(PY: rules.md); its JSON isWF. Exit 3: senderror.workflow-missingand stop.WF.unknownnot empty: sendnote.unknown-headingonce. NoWorkflow:line:WFis empty.
Constants: FIELD = Sprint field; tracker calls use the profile's Tools
(cloudId = Site when the tool takes one); WORKSPACE = Workspace, REPOS =
Repositories folder, ~ expanded.
Quote every path.
Stages. Each step below names its stage. At a stage, apply
WF.stages.<Stage>.before first, then the step together with in, and after
the stage ends (and is approved, where it needs approval) after. Apply every
instruction, in order, and skip none. One you cannot apply: send
ask.instruction-failed and wait. A placeholder from WF.placeholders gets
ask.placeholder the first time an instruction needs it; append Answer:
<placeholder> <value> to jira.md and use it for the rest of the task. You
fill <KEY>, <SUMMARY>, <REPO>, <BRANCH>, <BASE> and <TASK_DIR>
yourself. An instruction that names its own moment ("when the plan is approved")
runs at that moment, once, however many headings it sits under; before then it
is not a failure. A stage with no instructions follows the step's default. Write
to the tracker only when one says so.
Find the task
With an argument (KEY or URL):
- A URL whose host is not the Site's host: send
error.other-siteand stop. TakeKEYas the first match of[A-Z][A-Z0-9_]+-[0-9]+in the argument, uppercased. - The profile's issue tool with
fields: ["summary", FIELD]. Not found:error.not-found, stop. TASK_DIR= an existingWORKSPACE/*/<KEY>folder; else, with an activeFIELDentry (stateactivein any case, or a Server/Data Center string withstate=ACTIVE),WORKSPACE/SP_<id>/<KEY>; elseWORKSPACE/tasks/<KEY>.mkdir -pit; keep its files.mcp__ccd_directory__change_directorytoTASK_DIR(it applies after this turn; until then use absolute paths) andmcp__ccd_session_mgmt__set_session_title("self") to<KEY> <summary>(cut to 60 characters). Do not touch the sidebar.
Without an argument: the working folder's name is KEY when it matches
[A-Z][A-Z0-9_]+-[0-9]+ and the folder is inside WORKSPACE; then TASK_DIR =
it.
Otherwise send error.no-task and stop.
Status and Resume. references/status.md says how jira.md keeps status
lines; every "append to jira.md" follows it. Files in TASK_DIR: read them
and apply its Resume rule.
1. Brief and two questions (stage Brief)
- Read the issue: the profile's issue tool with every field that has a value
(description, comments, custom fields, links, attachments), and its remote
links tool when the profile names one. A later comment overrides the
description where they conflict; say so. A
Repo:line in the description (case-insensitive, comma-separated) givesJIRA_REPOS. Write all of it toTASK_DIR/jira.md(Write tool, never Edit; keep any## Statussection last, unchanged), with acceptance criteria as a list and each comment's author and date. - Write
TASK_DIR/brief.mdfollowingreferences/brief-format.md, then runreferences/review.mdon it (Kindbrief). - Send
brief.ready. WithJIRA_REPOS, go to 1.4 with those names in the same turn; otherwise sendask.reposin the same message and end the turn.{{examples}}: up to two repositoriesbrief.mdnames thatfind_repo.pyfinds, padded to two with unuseduser-api,order-api; never assumed as the answer. - Resolve each name:
PY -I "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/find_repo.py" "$REPOS" <name>. No result:ask.repo-missing; several:ask.repo-which; then wait. An unclear reply: ask again in one line; never choose. These repositories are changes; one with no task in the approved plan becomes read. - Send
confirm.repos(a repository not on GitHub, rules.md, gets "you open the merge request yourself"), appendRepositories: <name (changes|read)>, …tojira.md, thenmcp__ccd_directory__request_directoryfor each repository. - Send
ask.noteand end the turn. The reply isNOTE(its "nothing to add" option = none). Repositories it asks you to read are read unless it says they change. Add whatNOTEchanges tobrief.md. If it has no## Where to startyet, add it now (brief-format.md) and run review.md on it again with these repositories. - Append
Note: <NOTE or none>tojira.md(updateRepositories:ifNOTEchanged it) and go on to step 2 in the same turn.
2. Understand the task
- Read each repository's
CLAUDE.mdand the.claude/rules/files the task touches. - From the issue copy in
jira.md: parent/epic: summary and description only. Linked issues and sub-tasks: key, summary, status; read one in full only when the task depends on it. - If
ghworks:gh pr list --repo <owner>/<repo> --state all --search <KEY>for each listed repository on GitHub. - Run
references/discovery.md: it writesimpact.md. - Add 2.2 and 2.3 to
TASK_DIR/jira.md(rewrite it with the Write tool;Headings:stays first,## Statuslast and unchanged).
3. Spec (stage Spec)
Method: what WF.stages.Spec.in says; else superpowers if a
superpowers:brainstorming skill is available; else built-in.
- superpowers: invoke
superpowers:brainstormingwith args:Write the spec to <TASK_DIR>/spec.md in <DOC_LANG>. Context: <TASK_DIR>/jira.md, <TASK_DIR>/brief.md and <TASK_DIR>/impact.md; the user's note: <NOTE>. Ask only questions these do not settle and that change the design or an acceptance criterion, in one numbered message with a recommended answer each. One section per changing repository, an "Impact and contracts" section with every producer → consumer pair from impact.md, sketches with path:line and test names, a Scenarios section and a follow-up tasks section, following the writing rules and sections of ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/spec-guide.md. Also: <WF Spec instructions or none>. Rabbit reviews the spec and asks for approval itself: skip your builder check and approval gate. Stop once spec.md is written: do not commit it and do not invoke writing-plans. - built-in: write
TASK_DIR/spec.mdfollowingreferences/spec-guide.md.
Run Discovery again on the draft (update ## Impact and contracts if
impact.md changed), then references/review.md (Kind spec), then send
ask.spec-approval. On approval append Approved: spec <date>; with
Breaking: lines, send ask.breaking ({{breaks}} = those lines) and append
Approved: breaking <date> on its yes.
4. Plan (stage Plan)
Method as for the spec, with superpowers:writing-plans:
- superpowers args:
Spec: <TASK_DIR>/spec.md (approved). Write the plan to <TASK_DIR>/plan.md in <DOC_LANG>, tasks grouped by repository, with the order between repositories, and for every producer → consumer pair between changing repositories a contract-test task in the consumer repository (positive and negative cases, fixture from the producer's real output), a test for every spec Scenarios row (S<n>→<path>::<test>), following ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/plan-guide.md. Also: <WF Plan instructions or none>. Stop once plan.md is written: do not offer or start execution. - built-in: write
TASK_DIR/plan.mdfollowingreferences/plan-guide.md.
Run references/review.md (Kind plan), then send ask.plan-approval and wait
({{execute_line}} from step 5.1; {{branches}}: the names step 5.2's rule
gives, no worktree yet). A plan change that changes the spec updates
spec.md too and follows Approval below: they always agree.
On approval append Approved: plan <date> to jira.md.
Approval. A document changed after its review or approval: follow
review.md Changes. A change to an approved spec or plan: append Changed:
<spec|plan> <date>, update both documents, and once approved (again, when
needed) send rabbit: plan changed <task ids> to each dev session whose tasks
changed.
5. Dev sessions (stage Execute)
Plan approval is the go-ahead; do not wait for "start".
- Execute method: as
WF.stages.Executesays; elsesuperpowerswhen asuperpowers:executing-plansskill exists,nativeotherwise.{{execute_line}}names it, or is empty when the workflow decides. AppendExecute: <method>tojira.md. This session reads the Execute instructions only to choose the method; the dev sessions apply them. - For each changes repository with tasks in
plan.md: base as rules.md says; branch asWF.stages.Plan, itsCLAUDE.mdor.claude/rules/say, else one in the style of its recent branches (git -C <repo> for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate --count=20 --format='%(refname:short)' refs/remotes/origin) containingKEY, else<key-lowercase>;{{branches}}lists them, and the plan approval approves them. Worktree<repo>/.claude/worktrees/<key-lowercase>: already a worktree on<branch>(git -C <repo> worktree list --porcelain): reuse it. Elsegit -C <repo> fetch origin <base>, thengit -C <repo> worktree add <path> <branch>if the branch exists, elsegit -C <repo> worktree add --no-track -b <branch> <path> origin/<base>. Branch checked out elsewhere: stop and ask. If.claude/worktrees/is not ignored, add it to the filegit -C <repo> rev-parse --git-path info/excludeprints and say so in one line. - Fill
references/dev-session-prompt.md({{COORDINATOR}}= this session's id frommcp__ccd_session_mgmt__get_sessionwith"self";{{ANSWERS}}= the placeholder answers so far, or none). Write a bold title line and one sentence (several repositories:mcp__ccd_session__mark_chapterfirst), thenmcp__ccd_session__start_sessionwithinitiation: "user_asked",context: "fresh",cwd: <worktree>,use_worktree: false,title: "<KEY> <repo>",prompt= the filled Prompt section,background= the filled Background section. AppendCoordinator: <this session's id>tojira.mdonce, and for each started sessionDev: <repo> <its session id> <worktree> <branch> <base>. Never start a second session for a repository with aDev:line.
A repository added as changes later gets these steps once its spec and plan are approved.
6. Coordinate
Answer the dev sessions' messages (SendMessage to their local_… id). Each
sends rabbit: done <commits> when its part is implemented and self-reviewed;
on the first one per repository append Done: <repo> <date> to jira.md
(also when a subagent wrote the code). Write
the findings and follow-ups any rabbit: done carries to
reviews/diff-<repo>.md (references/review.md, Review file).
rabbit: blocked <reason> or a question it relays: tell the user, and send the
answer back as rabbit: answer <text>; rabbit: answered <question>: the user
answered there, drop it.
rabbit: placeholder <name> <value>: append Answer: <name> <value>. rabbit:
plan wrong <path:line> <finding>: change spec and plan as Approval says.
All changes repositories Done:: step 7, in the same turn.
7. Integration (stage Integration)
Follow references/integration.md.
8. Push and CI (stage Push)
Follow references/publish.md.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

