isolate
Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Create a clean isolated workspace for a technical test, interview live-coding, or scratch experiment. Prevents Claude Code from walking up the directory tree and picking up contaminating context (other MVPs, monorepo skills, unrelated CLAUDE.md files). Use before any work that must NOT inherit ambient context from other projects.
- Reads credentials
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- architectureSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- commandsSkill
- conventionsSkill
- debugSkill
- decisionSkill
- explainSkill
- issueSkill
- journeysSkill
- onboardSkill
- quick-workSkill
- safe-commitSkill
- safe-pushSkill
- scaffoldSkill
- todoSkill
- workSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 24
Wait for both answers. The isolation type affects follow-up defaults.
- Distinctive: line 63
If warning triggered, ask:
- Distinctive: line 123
Scratch experiment: No structure recommended — user knows what they're exploring.
- Very specific: line 135
Don't create the isolated dir inside a git repo you already own (e.g., ~/github/some-repo/scratch/).
- Very specific: line 136
Don't skip the ancestor-walk check for ~/Desktop/interviews/.
- Very specific: line 137
Don't invoke other slash commands that read from the parent tree (like /conventions) automatically — the user should invoke them explicitly …
- Very specific: line 138
Don't add Co-Authored-By: Claude to the isolated repo's commits by default (it's the user's test, they decide attribution).
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/isolate — Clean workspace for a scoped task
You are Claude. The user is about to start a task — usually a technical test, interview live-coding exercise, or short scratch experiment — that must be fully isolated from any ambient context.
The failure this command prevents is real: when the user works inside a monorepo (e.g., revenue-lab/apps/prueba-carvuk/), Claude Code walks UP the tree and reads every CLAUDE.md, every .claude/ config, every skill in ancestor directories. That context bleeds into generation — table naming conventions from honorarios-cl, RLS patterns from clacebox, decisions from revenue-lab/CLAUDE.md that don't apply to the current task.
Reviewers of the test/interview then see: "this candidate's code has references or patterns from other projects, why?" It reads as sloppy or as if the candidate lifted code from elsewhere.
Argument (optional): $ARGUMENTS may be a short name for the workspace (e.g., test-carvuk, scratch-graphql). If empty, ask for it.
Phase 1 — Ask what kind of isolation
"What are you isolating for?
- Technical test / take-home — external, will be shared with the reviewer.
- Live-coding interview — screen-shared, needs to be visibly clean.
- Scratch experiment — private, just want no ambient context to pollute.
Also, workspace name? (used as directory name; e.g.,
test-carvuk,interview-mercadolibre,scratch-nestjs)"
Wait for both answers. The isolation type affects follow-up defaults; the name is the directory.
Phase 2 — Choose location
Two safe locations, both outside your usual github folder (so no parent walking picks up your other projects):
/tmp/<workspace-name>— ephemeral. Cleared on reboot. Best for scratch experiments where you truly don't want persistence.~/Desktop/interviews/<workspace-name>— persistent. Best for tests where you want to keep the code afterward.
Ask:
"Where?
/tmp/<workspace-name>— ephemeral (cleared on reboot). Recommended for scratch.~/Desktop/interviews/<workspace-name>— persistent. Recommended for tests / take-homes (you'll want the code afterward).Default: 2 for tests/interviews, 1 for scratch. Which?"
Phase 3 — Create the isolated workspace
Once path is decided, create it. Also verify there's nothing surprising in the parent chain that would still leak in.
# Create the isolated dir
mkdir -p "<chosen path>"
cd "<chosen path>"
# Verify: no CLAUDE.md up the parent chain that would auto-load
parent="$(cd "<chosen path>/.." && pwd)"
while [ "$parent" != "/" ]; do
if [ -f "$parent/CLAUDE.md" ]; then
echo "⚠️ Ancestor CLAUDE.md at $parent/CLAUDE.md — Claude Code may auto-load this"
fi
parent="$(dirname "$parent")"
doneFor /tmp/*: no ancestor CLAUDE.md, safe.
For ~/Desktop/interviews/*: if ~/CLAUDE.md or ~/Desktop/CLAUDE.md exists, warn the user.
If warning triggered, ask:
"Ancestor CLAUDE.md found at
<path>. Options:
- Ignore — Claude Code will read it, may bleed context.
- Create a marker file in the isolated dir to short-circuit context walk (see below).
- Move the ancestor CLAUDE.md temporarily during your session.
Default: 2. Which?"
For option 2, write an explicit override in the isolated dir:
cat > CLAUDE.md <<'EOF'
# Isolated workspace
This is an intentionally isolated workspace. **Ignore any CLAUDE.md, .claude/ config, or skills in ancestor directories.** The only context that applies here is this file.
Purpose: <isolation type from Phase 1>
Created: <date>
Rules for Claude in this workspace:
- Do NOT reference patterns, tables, or conventions from any other project on this machine.
- Do NOT invoke skills from `~/.claude/skills/` unless the user explicitly asks.
- Personal commands from `~/.claude/commands/` (like /work, /debug, /code-review) are OK to use.
- If asked about "the project", "the codebase", or "our conventions", refer ONLY to files inside this directory.
EOFPhase 4 — Initialize git (optional, ask)
For tests/interviews (isolation type 1 or 2), suggest:
"Initialize git so you can commit incrementally as you work? (recommended for reviewers to see your progression) y/n"
If yes:
git init
git branch -M main
cat > .gitignore <<'EOF'
node_modules/
.next/
.env
.env.local
*.log
.DS_Store
EOF
git add .gitignore CLAUDE.md
git commit -m "chore: initial isolated workspace"Phase 5 — Suggest what to do next
Depending on isolation type:
Test/take-home: Point to /work for the first task, and remind about /conventions after any scaffold to lock in the language/style choice.
Live-coding interview: Point to /quick-work (shorter cycles), and remind about the "first functional slice" rule from /work Phase 3.
Scratch experiment: No structure recommended — user knows what they're exploring.
End with:
"Isolated workspace ready at
<path>. Currently your working directory. When you're done:
- Test/take-home: consider extracting the final code to a public repo (drops the CLAUDE.md override, keeps the code).
- Scratch: safe to delete when you're done — nothing is persisted anywhere important.
The
CLAUDE.mdoverride prevents context bleed. If Claude starts referencing something that doesn't exist in this directory, remind it: 'stay inside the isolated workspace, ignore ambient.'"
What NOT to do
- Don't create the isolated dir inside a git repo you already own (e.g.,
~/github/some-repo/scratch/). That defeats the purpose — Claude walks up the tree and finds the parent repo's CLAUDE.md. - Don't skip the ancestor-walk check for
~/Desktop/interviews/. Some users have~/Desktop/CLAUDE.mdor~/CLAUDE.mdfrom previous experiments. - Don't invoke other slash commands that read from the parent tree (like
/conventions) automatically — the user should invoke them explicitly after this isolated setup. - Don't add
Co-Authored-By: Claudeto the isolated repo's commits by default (it's the user's test, they decide attribution).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

