agentleFS
mattiaceruttimattiacerutti/supernova/.agents/skills/create-pr/SKILL.md

create-pr

Skill194 starsChanged 24 days agoMITView on GitHub

Create a pull request with conventional branch naming and title, and a concise, human description. Always use when the user asks to create, open, submit, or raise a PR or pull request.

196 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use update-pr, act-on-feedback and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • MicrosoftSkill

    update-pr

    Update the pull request for the current session. Use when the user wants to push new changes to an existing PR.

    Also in 9 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    act-on-feedback

    Act on user feedback attached to the current session. Use when the user submits feedback on the session's changes via the Submit Feedback button.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • ModelEngine-GroupSkill

    create-release-note

    从 PR/commit 中自动生成结构化的 Release Notes,并可选创建 GitHub Draft Release。支持 x.y.0 版本合并前一 minor 系列的 release notes。当用户要求生成发布说明、创建 release notes 时触发。参数为版本号和可选的上一版本号。

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • frostneySkill

    native-nostalgia-stack

    Applies the user's FreePascal toolchain and its build, formatting, hook, and test contracts while leaving project-specific mechanics local. Use when scaffolding or working in a FreePascal project that follows this toolchain.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • frostneySkill

    software-engineering-excellence

    Applies the user's engineering standards during substantial technical work: preserve scope, use current evidence, delegate independent parts, and complete authorized outcomes. Use during substantial implementation, debugging, refactoring, or multi-part delivery work.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • parkchuSkill

    start-mission

    넥스트스텝(NextStep) 미션을 처음 시작할 때, 미션 저장소를 fork·clone하고 최초 작업 브랜치(step1 등)까지 만들어 준다. gh CLI로 fork하고 clone까지 이어서 처리하며, gh가 없거나 인증이 안 돼 있으면 브라우저 Fork 안내로 폴백한다. 이미 fork/clone돼 있으면 재사용하고 이어서 진행한다(재실행 안전). 사용자가 "미션 시작하려는데 저장소 세팅해줘", "새 미션 시작할래", "fork부터 해줘", "/nextstep:start-mission" 등으로 요청할 때 사용한다.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +1 more from microsoft

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 179 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 7

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Always read and use the commit-message skill to generate the branch name, PR title, and any commit messages.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    If it exists and has a conventional name, use it.

    line 14
  3. Distinctive:

    If it does not exist, create it.

    line 15
  4. Very specific:

    Use <type>/<short-kebab-case-summary>, such as feature/added-session-search, fix/fixed-reconnect, or refactor/session-runtime.

    line 16
  5. Very specific:

    Use Conventional Commits: type(scope?): summary, with an imperative summary, such as feat: add session search.

    line 20
  6. Distinctive:

    Write like a developer explaining the change to another developer: short, human, direct, and informational.

    line 26
  7. Distinctive:

    Do not add a verification or testing section, or list routine test, lint, build, or CI results.

    line 34
  8. Distinctive:

    Avoid file-by-file inventories, commit dumps, marketing language, and boilerplate headings or checklists unless required by the repository.

    line 35
  9. Distinctive:

    Use a natural, matter-of-fact voice.

    line 37

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 179 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Create PR

Always read and use the commit-message skill to generate the branch name, PR title, and any commit messages. For the PR title, use the full diff against the base branch rather than only staged changes.

Branch

First determine whether the current branch already has a remote branch.

  • If it exists and has a conventional name, use it. Otherwise stop and flag the name to the user; do not silently rename or replace it.
  • If it does not exist, create it. Reuse the local name if conventional; otherwise choose a conventional remote name based on the overall changes, leaving the local name unchanged.
  • Use <type>/<short-kebab-case-summary>, such as feature/added-session-search, fix/fixed-reconnect, or refactor/session-runtime.

Title

Use Conventional Commits: type(scope?): summary, with an imperative summary, such as feat: add session search.

Summarize the overall outcome of the full PR, not one minor change or a list of commits. Keep it short and specific; use a scope only when useful.

Description

Write like a developer explaining the change to another developer: short, human, direct, and informational.

  • Open with one or two sentences: the problem and what the PR does about it. No "Summary" heading.
  • Describe changes in present tense, with "This PR" stated or implied: "Fixes", "Centralizes", "Adds". This applies to bullets too. Avoid imperative instructions ("Fix") or past-tense work logs ("Fixed"); past tense is fine when explaining the previous behavior.
  • Group changes by outcome, not by commit or file. Use bullets only for several independent outcomes, one line each.
  • State what changes for users or reviewers, not how it is implemented. Leave out internals (library mechanics, hook or function names, data flow) unless a reviewer needs them to judge risk.
  • Include at most one headline measurement, and only when the PR is about performance. Detailed numbers belong in comments or linked notes.
  • Mention important limitations in one line each. Only make claims supported by the changes or known context.
  • Do not add a verification or testing section, or list routine test, lint, build, or CI results.
  • Avoid file-by-file inventories, commit dumps, marketing language, and boilerplate headings or checklists unless required by the repository.

Use a natural, matter-of-fact voice. Give readers enough context to understand the intent without narrating the implementation. Length limits: a small fix gets two or three sentences; even a large PR stays under about 120 words and five bullets. If a draft is longer, cut it before showing it, and remove any sentence a reviewer would not miss.

Publish the branch and create the PR, then return its URL. Do not overwrite remote work, commit uncommitted changes, or merge without permission.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.