website-copy
Skill1 starsChanged 31 days agoMITView on GitHub
Writes website copy for one page or a whole site in three passes. First a rough draft from the messaging, then a tight edit for length and clarity, then a voice pass in the brand's tone. Keeps headlines under 100 characters and subheads under 150, traces every claim back to the messaging, and invents no numbers. Use when someone says "write the homepage", "website copy", "landing page copy", "rewrite our site", "copy for these pages" or "full-site copy refresh".
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- dedene/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- Asdstar30/market-native-contenttheir own version, first seen Sep 15, 2026
- fabio-baumgartner/unternehmer-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 26, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- dedene/skills★ 14same name
- fabio-baumgartner/unternehmer-skills★ 1same name
- Asdstar30/market-native-content★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- ab-testingSkill
- metadata-lintSkill
- site-architectureSkill
- website-scoreSkill
- website-wireframeSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Write page copy that says what the company decided to say, in the buyer's words, at a length people actually read.
- Very specific: line 15
After /website-score has found weak sections, or /website-wireframe has set the sections.
- Distinctive: line 17
Don't use it to decide the positioning or messaging itself (settle those first), or for blog posts, emails or ads.
- Distinctive: line 38
Pass 1, the rough draft: Write every section in full without editing.
- Very specific: line 60
Every claim and number can be traced to the messaging file or a source.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Website copy
Write page copy that says what the company decided to say, in the buyer's words, at a length people actually read. Three passes, each with one job: get it all down, cut it hard, then make it sound like the brand.
When to use it
- Writing or rewriting one page or a set of pages.
- After
/website-scorehas found weak sections, or/website-wireframehas set the sections.
Don't use it to decide the positioning or messaging itself (settle those first), or for blog posts, emails or ads.
Inputs
Required:
- The page or pages, and the main action each one should drive.
context/messaging/: value proposition, capabilities, differentiators, proof.context/icp/: pains, outcomes and the exact phrases buyers use.
Helps if you have it:
- A wireframe per page (from
/website-wireframe). Without one, use the standard order: hero, problem, how it works, benefits, proof, FAQ, final CTA. context/brand/: tone of voice, words to use and avoid, and your brand tokens if you have them.context/competitors/andcontext/win-loss/: real objections for the FAQ and sharper differentiation.
Agency users: swap context/ for clients/<client>/context/. If messaging or ICP is missing, ask for the value proposition, three benefits and three buyer pains before writing, and mark the draft as resting on unconfirmed messaging.
Steps
- Map the message to sections. For each section on each page, note which messaging point and which buyer pain it carries. A section with no source is cut or flagged. Produces: a section-to-message map.
- Pass 1, the rough draft. Write every section in full without editing. Each headline must trace to a messaging point. No invented claims, numbers or customers. Produces: a full draft per page.
- Pass 2, the tight edit. Cut filler, turn passive into active, remove repetition between sections, and hit the limits below. Produces: an edited draft with word counts.
- Pass 3, the voice pass. Rewrite in the brand's tone from
context/brand/. Use the buyer's own phrases from the ICP file. Offer two alternative headlines for each hero. Produces: final copy plus alternatives. - Check persuasion. Pick the one or two levers that address what's actually stopping this reader (proof from similar companies, a specific credential, a true deadline, a free first step) and make sure each is true. Then check the hero is simple and concrete enough to repeat after one read. Produces: notes on which levers you used and why.
- Review with the user page by page, and loop any page that misses back to pass 3 with their notes. Produces: approved copy.
For several pages, run pass 1 on every page before starting pass 2, so the edit sees the whole site and catches repetition across pages.
Length limits
| Element | Limit |
| Headline | under 100 characters (8 to 12 words is the sweet spot) |
| Subhead | under 150 characters (15 to 25 words) |
| Problem or benefit block | 20 to 50 words each |
| CTA label | 2 to 5 words, naming what happens next |
What good looks like
- The hero says what it is, who it's for and why it matters, without the reader scrolling.
- Specific beats general: "syncs your CRM every 30 seconds" beats "enables data synchronisation".
- The CTA names the outcome: "See your pipeline in 10 minutes" beats "Get started".
- Every claim and number can be traced to the messaging file or a source. Gaps are marked
[source needed]. - Sentence case headlines, contractions, short sentences.
Mistakes to avoid
- Buzzwords that could describe any product: powerful, platform, solution, all-in-one, next-generation.
- "We" and "our" in every line. The page is about the reader's problem.
- The same benefit restated in three sections.
- Lists of three short punchy sentences in a row, and "it's not X, it's Y" lines. Both read as machine-written.
- Making up stats, customer names or quotes to fill a proof section.
- Writing to a wireframe slot that has no messaging behind it.
Output
Save to outputs/website/MMYY-copy/, one file per page plus a combined final.md:
# <Page> copy
Goal: <CTA> Audience: <ICP>
## Hero
H1: ... (87 chars) Alternatives: ... / ...
Subhead: ... (132 chars)
CTA: ...
## Problem
...
## Notes
Levers used: ... Open items: [source needed] ...Next step: test the riskiest headline with /ab-testing, and check each page's head tags with /metadata-lint before launch.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

