goals
Skill3 starsChanged 31 days agoMITView on GitHub
Turns a target someone has already committed to (a board plan, an annual plan, a contract) into a plan the team can measure: KPIs in three tiers with a guardrail for each, a baseline from real data, monthly pacing with lag and seasonality, and two or three channels chosen from how your ICP actually searches and buys. Writes context/goals/MMYY-scope.md and context/goals/measurement.md. It never invents the target. Triggers: "set our goals", "what are our KPIs", "revenue target and pacing", "which channels and what targets", "write the scope file", "are we on track". Run after /funnel-strategy. Not for designing funnel stages (use /funnel-strategy).
12 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- matteotitta/repo-structure-agencyword for word, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- codewhale-hq/codewhale-plugin-marketplacetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- 0xUrsanomics/utopia-ostheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- kriscard/Skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 28, 2026
- jaredhhawk/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- obra/muse-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use test, research and 2 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Microsoft AzureSkilltest
Also in 3 projects that use this
NVIDIASkillresearch
Before designing a feature, research how comparable libraries solve the problem, check best practices, known pitfalls, and upstream changes. Use when starting a new feature, investigating an unfamiliar area, or the user asks to research something.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Hugging FaceSkillimplement
Make tests pass. Invoke after /write-tests produces failing tests.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkillcode-review
Adversarial systems, concurrency, memory-model, and architecture code review protocol. Use this skill whenever asked to review code, PRs, diffs, or branches in Filament.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions12 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- matteotitta/repo-structure-agency★ 1100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 11
- alxyrgin/health-os★ 38same name
- dfrysinger/qrspi-plus★ 37same name
- sneakers-the-rat/muse-skills★ 24same name
- obra/muse-skills★ 20same name
- kriscard/Skills★ 15same name
- jacobwell/muse-skills★ 8same name
- codewhale-hq/codewhale-plugin-marketplace★ 5same name
- 0xUrsanomics/utopia-os★ 2same name
- michaelsvanbeek/personal-agent-skills★ 1same name
- jaredhhawk/claude-skills★ 0same name
1 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- brand-kitSkill
- company-contextSkill
- competitor-researchSkill
- expert-povSkill
- funnel-strategySkill
- icp-researchSkill
- messagingSkill
- positioningSkill
- tov-guidelinesSkill
- win-lossSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 10 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 19
It never invents the target: No committed number, no run: ask for it.
- Distinctive: line 25
When someone asks "what are we actually trying to hit, and through which channels?"
- Very specific: line 27
Don't use it to design funnel stages (/funnel-strategy), or for traction goals before the product has any repeatable way to win customers.
- Distinctive: line 31
Ask once, then proceed.
- Very specific: line 51
Paths: Write context/goals/MMYY-scope.md and context/goals/measurement.md.
- Distinctive: line 69
Don't put the gap-closing work in the last month, where it can't land in time.
- Distinctive: line 89
Every KPI has a guardrail, a baseline and a source.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 10 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Goals
Every later piece of marketing work should start from context/goals/. This skill fills it. It takes a number someone has already committed to and works out what to measure, where you stand today, how fast you need to move each month, and which channels will carry it, so anyone can tell by the 10th of the month whether you're on track.
It never invents the target. No committed number, no run: ask for it.
When to use it
- The last step of the context folder, after
/funnel-strategy. - A new financial year, a new plan or a new contract.
- When someone asks "what are we actually trying to hit, and through which channels?"
Don't use it to design funnel stages (/funnel-strategy), or for traction goals before the product has any repeatable way to win customers.
Two modes
Ask once, then proceed.
| Company mode | Engagement mode | |
| Who | In-house marketer, founder, head of marketing | Consultant or agency, per client |
| Target from | Board plan, annual plan, revenue target | Contract, statement of work, signed proposal |
| Baseline from | Your CRM, last 12 months | The client's CRM, analytics and reports |
Inputs
Required: the target, with a date and its source.
Recommended:
- a CRM export for the last 12 months (strip names and emails first; keep aggregates only)
context/goals/MMYY-funnel.mdfrom/funnel-strategy, for the stages and conversion ratescontext/icp/, for where buyers search, compare and decide- analytics or ad reports, for traffic and channel numbers
Missing inputs don't stop the run. Mark each gap [TBD: collect X] and say what would fill it.
Paths. Write context/goals/MMYY-scope.md and context/goals/measurement.md. Agency or consultant? Swap context/ for clients/<client>/context/ throughout.
Steps
- Pin the target. Quote it with its source: "£450k new revenue by 31 Aug 2027 (FY plan, slide 4)". Keep ranges and scenarios as given. Ask how much risk the business will accept and how fast it needs results. That caps how aggressive the pacing can be.
- Choose one focus for this period: pipeline, new customers, activation, retention, expansion or a launch. A team that pushes every number at once moves none of them.
- Set KPIs in three tiers, three per tier at most:
- Outcome: the target itself.
- Drivers: the two or three numbers on the focus that lead to the outcome, taken from the funnel (qualified opportunities and win rate for pipeline; activation rate for activation).
- Activity: what the team controls week to week, one per channel.
- Give every driver and activity KPI a guardrail: the number that must not get worse while you push it. Lead volume versus lead quality. Send volume versus unsubscribes. Discounting versus win rate.
- Set baselines. Today's number for every KPI, from its real source, with the count it rests on. Fewer than 20 deals, or under six months of history, is a direction, not a fact: say so next to the number. A new channel has no baseline. Give it a test budget, not a target.
Find the gap and pace it. The gap is the target minus where today's run rate lands. Work it back through the funnel's conversion rates to the volume needed each month. Pace with:
- the sales cycle lag (pipeline leads revenue by one typical cycle)
- seasonality from the company's own history
- a ramp for new channels
- low, medium and high scenarios
Don't put the gap-closing work in the last month, where it can't land in time.
- Pick channels from ICP behaviour. From
context/icp/, list where buyers search, compare and decide. Shortlist two or three channels. Give each one job, one metric and the activity KPI it owns, and name the constraint likely to cap it (budget, people, content, sales capacity). Every channel must trace to a line in the ICP file, not to habit. - Write
measurement.md. One entry per KPI and guardrail: the source, the exact counting rule, the cadence and the owner. A KPI with no possible source moves to open questions. - Hand off in three lines: the target and the gap, the focus and its drivers, the channels.
Output shape
MMYY-scope.md:
- Target with source, and the gap.
- Focus.
- KPI table: tier, KPI, guardrail, baseline (with count), target.
- Monthly pacing table with low, medium and high.
- Channels: job, metric, constraint, ICP evidence.
- Open questions.
measurement.md: KPI, source, counting rule, cadence, owner.
What good looks like
- The target is quoted, not estimated.
- Every KPI has a guardrail, a baseline and a source.
- Small samples are flagged once.
- Pacing respects lag and seasonality instead of a flat line to the target.
- Nobody has to ask how a number is counted.
Mistakes to avoid
- Inventing or "suggesting" the target.
- Rates as outcomes. The outcome is a total, such as revenue or customers.
- KPIs with no guardrail, which get gamed.
- Channels picked because the team already uses them, not because buyers do.
- Personal data in the saved files.
Chain
The final step of the suggested chain: /company-context → /icp-research → /competitor-research → /win-loss → /expert-pov → /tov-guidelines → /brand-kit → /positioning → /messaging → /funnel-strategy → goals.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

