agentleFS
matteotittamatteotitta/claude-marketing-context/skills/goals/SKILL.md

goals

Skill3 starsChanged 31 days agoMITView on GitHub

Turns a target someone has already committed to (a board plan, an annual plan, a contract) into a plan the team can measure: KPIs in three tiers with a guardrail for each, a baseline from real data, monthly pacing with lag and seasonality, and two or three channels chosen from how your ICP actually searches and buys. Writes context/goals/MMYY-scope.md and context/goals/measurement.md. It never invents the target. Triggers: "set our goals", "what are our KPIs", "revenue target and pacing", "which channels and what targets", "write the scope file", "are we on track". Run after /funnel-strategy. Not for designing funnel stages (use /funnel-strategy).

12 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use test, research and 2 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Microsoft AzureSkill

    test

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • NVIDIASkill

    research

    Before designing a feature, research how comparable libraries solve the problem, check best practices, known pitfalls, and upstream changes. Use when starting a new feature, investigating an unfamiliar area, or the user asks to research something.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • Hugging FaceSkill

    implement

    Make tests pass. Invoke after /write-tests produces failing tests.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    code-review

    Adversarial systems, concurrency, memory-model, and architecture code review protocol. Use this skill whenever asked to review code, PRs, diffs, or branches in Filament.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 10 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    It never invents the target: No committed number, no run: ask for it.

    line 19
  2. Distinctive:

    When someone asks "what are we actually trying to hit, and through which channels?"

    line 25
  3. Very specific:

    Don't use it to design funnel stages (/funnel-strategy), or for traction goals before the product has any repeatable way to win customers.

    line 27
  4. Distinctive:

    Ask once, then proceed.

    line 31
  5. Very specific:

    Paths: Write context/goals/MMYY-scope.md and context/goals/measurement.md.

    line 51
  6. Distinctive:

    Don't put the gap-closing work in the last month, where it can't land in time.

    line 69
  7. Distinctive:

    Every KPI has a guardrail, a baseline and a source.

    line 89

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 10 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Goals

Every later piece of marketing work should start from context/goals/. This skill fills it. It takes a number someone has already committed to and works out what to measure, where you stand today, how fast you need to move each month, and which channels will carry it, so anyone can tell by the 10th of the month whether you're on track.

It never invents the target. No committed number, no run: ask for it.

When to use it

  • The last step of the context folder, after /funnel-strategy.
  • A new financial year, a new plan or a new contract.
  • When someone asks "what are we actually trying to hit, and through which channels?"

Don't use it to design funnel stages (/funnel-strategy), or for traction goals before the product has any repeatable way to win customers.

Two modes

Ask once, then proceed.

Company modeEngagement mode
WhoIn-house marketer, founder, head of marketingConsultant or agency, per client
Target fromBoard plan, annual plan, revenue targetContract, statement of work, signed proposal
Baseline fromYour CRM, last 12 monthsThe client's CRM, analytics and reports

Inputs

Required: the target, with a date and its source.

Recommended:

  • a CRM export for the last 12 months (strip names and emails first; keep aggregates only)
  • context/goals/MMYY-funnel.md from /funnel-strategy, for the stages and conversion rates
  • context/icp/, for where buyers search, compare and decide
  • analytics or ad reports, for traffic and channel numbers

Missing inputs don't stop the run. Mark each gap [TBD: collect X] and say what would fill it.

Paths. Write context/goals/MMYY-scope.md and context/goals/measurement.md. Agency or consultant? Swap context/ for clients/<client>/context/ throughout.

Steps

  1. Pin the target. Quote it with its source: "£450k new revenue by 31 Aug 2027 (FY plan, slide 4)". Keep ranges and scenarios as given. Ask how much risk the business will accept and how fast it needs results. That caps how aggressive the pacing can be.
  2. Choose one focus for this period: pipeline, new customers, activation, retention, expansion or a launch. A team that pushes every number at once moves none of them.
  3. Set KPIs in three tiers, three per tier at most:
    • Outcome: the target itself.
    • Drivers: the two or three numbers on the focus that lead to the outcome, taken from the funnel (qualified opportunities and win rate for pipeline; activation rate for activation).
    • Activity: what the team controls week to week, one per channel.
  4. Give every driver and activity KPI a guardrail: the number that must not get worse while you push it. Lead volume versus lead quality. Send volume versus unsubscribes. Discounting versus win rate.
  5. Set baselines. Today's number for every KPI, from its real source, with the count it rests on. Fewer than 20 deals, or under six months of history, is a direction, not a fact: say so next to the number. A new channel has no baseline. Give it a test budget, not a target.
  6. Find the gap and pace it. The gap is the target minus where today's run rate lands. Work it back through the funnel's conversion rates to the volume needed each month. Pace with:

    • the sales cycle lag (pipeline leads revenue by one typical cycle)
    • seasonality from the company's own history
    • a ramp for new channels
    • low, medium and high scenarios

    Don't put the gap-closing work in the last month, where it can't land in time.

  7. Pick channels from ICP behaviour. From context/icp/, list where buyers search, compare and decide. Shortlist two or three channels. Give each one job, one metric and the activity KPI it owns, and name the constraint likely to cap it (budget, people, content, sales capacity). Every channel must trace to a line in the ICP file, not to habit.
  8. Write measurement.md. One entry per KPI and guardrail: the source, the exact counting rule, the cadence and the owner. A KPI with no possible source moves to open questions.
  9. Hand off in three lines: the target and the gap, the focus and its drivers, the channels.

Output shape

MMYY-scope.md:

  1. Target with source, and the gap.
  2. Focus.
  3. KPI table: tier, KPI, guardrail, baseline (with count), target.
  4. Monthly pacing table with low, medium and high.
  5. Channels: job, metric, constraint, ICP evidence.
  6. Open questions.

measurement.md: KPI, source, counting rule, cadence, owner.

What good looks like

  • The target is quoted, not estimated.
  • Every KPI has a guardrail, a baseline and a source.
  • Small samples are flagged once.
  • Pacing respects lag and seasonality instead of a flat line to the target.
  • Nobody has to ask how a number is counted.

Mistakes to avoid

  • Inventing or "suggesting" the target.
  • Rates as outcomes. The outcome is a total, such as revenue or customers.
  • KPIs with no guardrail, which get gamed.
  • Channels picked because the team already uses them, not because buyers do.
  • Personal data in the saved files.

Chain

The final step of the suggested chain: /company-context → /icp-research → /competitor-research → /win-loss → /expert-pov → /tov-guidelines → /brand-kit → /positioning → /messaging → /funnel-strategy → goals.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.