agentleFS
matteotittamatteotitta/claude-code-marketing-quickstart/.claude/skills/level/SKILL.md

level

Skill70 starsChanged 11 days agoMITView on GitHub

Score your Claude Code environment on a fun 0-10 ladder (Tourist → Swarm) calibrated to the quickstart's 4 systems — Context, Skills, Integrations, Orchestration. Two front doors - an interactive quiz (zero setup, shareable) or a silent scan of your repo. Outputs a next-level roadmap plus a branded HTML dashboard or a paste-anywhere ASCII card. The default mastery skill of this quickstart. Triggers - "level", "what's my claude code level", "claude code level quiz", "assess my setup", "how good is my setup", "claude code maturity

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    No flag → --mode beginner, and offer both front doors ("Want the quick quiz, or should I scan your repo?").

    line 38
  2. Very specific:

    Always produce output after Phase 1 (+ Phase 2 unless --assess).

    line 68
  3. Very specific:

    Write to ~/Desktop/claude-code-level.html, open it (open macOS / xdg-open Linux / start Windows), tell the user the path + the brand …

    line 76

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

level — the 10 levels of Claude Code

Most people using Claude Code have no idea how much of it they're actually using. This skill scores you 0-10 on a ladder calibrated to the 4 systems this quickstart teaches — Context · Skills · Integrations · Orchestration — benchmarked against a fully-built setup + the latest Anthropic features, then hands you a focused roadmap and a shareable card.

It's the quickstart's mastery skill: the 8 research skills build your marketing OS; /level tells you how far along the Claude Code curve you are and what to build next. Level 0 is "just installed it." Level 10 is genuinely rare — the documented ceiling in references/benchmark.md.

Pick a front door → Score it → Show the roadmap → Render output → Build first step
       ↓                ↓             ↓               ↓               ↓
   quiz or scan    0-10 + 4 pillars  next level only  html / ascii    optional

Re-run it whenever you want — the score updates as you level up.


Modes and flags

FlagEffect
--mode beginner (default)"Knowledgeable friend" voice — explain why each thing matters, define jargon. Default front door = quiz.
--mode internalTerser, for auditing your own / your team's setup. Default front door = scan.
--brand-kit <path>Brand the HTML dashboard from a brand kit (a DESIGN.md with token frontmatter). Default = your context/brand/brand-kit.md once populated, else plain dark. --brand-kit none forces plain dark.
--format html (default) | ascii | bothOutput shape. html = branded dashboard. ascii = paste-anywhere card (Slack / LinkedIn / a code block). both = each.
--quiz / --assessForce the quiz, or the silent scan (then stop after the assessment).
--buildSkip assessment; jump to building the next step.

No flag → --mode beginner, and offer both front doors ("Want the quick quiz, or should I scan your repo?").


Phase 1 — pick a front door, then score

Both doors converge on the same result: a level (0-10) + a 0-4 sub-score per pillar. references/levels.md is the source of truth — the ladder, the 4-pillar mapping, the scan checklist, and the scoring rule.

Quiz (default in beginner mode)

Read references/quiz.md. Ask the ~8 questions in one AskUserQuestion call (clean clickable options — fun and fast). Map each answer to its pillar + level band, then reconcile to a level + 4 pillar sub-scores per the rule in quiz.md. Needs nothing on disk, so it works before you've built anything — and the result is screenshot-shareable.

Scan (default in internal mode)

Silently inspect the repo using the scan checklist in levels.md — CLAUDE.md, .claude/skills, .mcp.json + plugins, memory / rules, hooks + agents, headless / browser signals, worktrees, scheduled tasks. Then ask the 3 context questions (what you use Claude for / biggest friction / one thing you'd automate). Determine the level. Quantity ≠ level — 50 trivial skills is still Level 3; integration + complexity move the rungs.

Present the assessment

Anchor the ceiling with references/benchmark.md. Present, in the mode's voice: the level + its fun name + vibe; the dual lens (which pillars are strong, which is the gap); a bottom-to-top walk of the rungs cleared, then the first rung that stops you and why it matters (plain language). Most marketers land 1-4; 5 is strong; 7+ is rare. If --assess, stop here.


Phase 2 — the roadmap (next level only)

Show ONLY the next-level transition — focus is everything. Read the matching section in references/roadmaps.md for the assessed level and present its 3-4 steps with time estimates.


Generate the output

Always produce output after Phase 1 (+ Phase 2 unless --assess). Pick the shape from --format (default html). For sharing, offer the ASCII card.

HTML dashboard (--format html, default — or both)

  1. Read references/dashboard-template.html.
  2. Resolve the brand: --brand-kit <path> if given; else your context/brand/brand-kit.md (once populated); else --brand-kit none / the template's dark defaults.
  3. Map brand-kit tokens → dashboard tokens per the template's comment: colors.accent→{{ACCENT}} (primary), colors.tertiary/success→{{DONE}}, colors.background/surface→{{BG}}/{{SURFACE}}, colors.on-background*→text tokens, typography.*.fontFamily→{{FONT}} (+ its web <link> as {{FONT_LINK}}), name/domain→{{BRAND_NAME}}/{{BRAND_URL}}. Use the kit's exact hex — never approximate.
  4. Replace every {{TOKEN}} with real assessment data — per-pillar bars + the shareable result card.
  5. Write to ~/Desktop/claude-code-level.html, open it (open macOS / xdg-open Linux / start Windows), tell the user the path + the brand applied.

ASCII card (--format ascii — or both)

A fixed-width, paste-anywhere card. Build a JSON payload and pipe it to the generator (it asserts every line is identical width, so the box never misaligns):

echo '{"level":N,"name":"<level name>","vibe":"<vibe>",
"pillars":{"Context":c,"Skills":s,"Integrations":i,"Orchestration":o},
"takeaway":["short line 1 (≤48 chars)","line 2"],
"brand_name":"<your brand>","brand_url":"<your domain>"}' \
  | python3 references/ascii-card.py

It prints the card and saves ~/Desktop/claude-code-level.txt. Also paste the card inline in a fenced code block so the user can copy it from chat. brand_name/brand_url come from your brand kit's name + domain.


Phase 3 — build it now (optional)

Ask: "Want me to build the first step of your roadmap right now?" If yes, execute the matching step in references/build-steps.md. Adapt to the person — don't paste templates verbatim. If they score 0-2, point them at the quickstart's 15-minute tour and the 8 research skills to build context fast.


Self-roast (run before delivering)

  • Is the level honest, or inflated? Quantity ≠ maturity — did I check integration + complexity?
  • Did I anchor Level 10 to benchmark.md?
  • Beginner mode: did I explain why each gap matters and define jargon?
  • Did I show only the NEXT level's roadmap, not all 10?
  • Did the output actually render (dashboard opened, or ASCII card pasted inline)?

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

Reviews can't be read right now.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.