swarm
Skill1 starsChanged 39 days agoMITView on GitHub
Invocation-only workflow. Use only when the user includes literal `swarm` as an instruction to apply this workflow. Do not trigger for broader agent, harness, judge, checker, orchestration, or multi-agent requests unless the literal `swarm` invocation is present.
87 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- niksavis/basiclytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- endqwerty/endstacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- tristanphvn/keeltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- hidenobunagai/astacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Belweave/hstacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- blinkboxhq/Blinkboxtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use poteto-help, make-bot-ui and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
ianclearySkillpoteto-help
Guides users through pstack setup, /poteto-mode, and picking the skill, playbook, or principle for a task. Type /poteto-help with a question.
Also in 14 projects that use this
eryzerzSkillmake-bot-ui
Use when building a custom UI (page, dashboard, buttons) that should wake a Grok Bot over a webhook, when the user must provide a webhook sender key, or when exposing that UI on Tailscale.
Also in 19 projects that use this
ianclearySkillprinciple-explain-the-number
Apply before you trust, report, or act on a number you measured: a speedup, a regression, a throughput, a latency, or an eval result. Find what limits it, and rule out that it measured something other than the work you think.
Also in 27 projects that use this
bnemaSkillsetup-pstack
Configure which Pi models pstack uses per role. Detects available provider/model specs and writes pstack's user configuration. Use for /setup-pstack, "configure pstack models", or changing pstack model choices.
Also in 23 projects that use this
jaydubya818Skillprinciple-attack-the-premise
Apply when repeated fixes fail and a shared assumption may be wrong.
Also in 31 projects that use this
jaydubya818Skillpoteto-mode
Use when non-trivial work should follow the smallest rigorous Jstack workflow.
Also in 27 projects that use this
- +5 more from jaydubya818
Other versions87 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 87
- backnotprop/pstack★ 3.8ksame name
- langchain-ai/langchain-skills★ 1.3ksame name
- moeru-ai/xsai★ 667same name
- zaxbysauce/opencode-swarm★ 519same name
- ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm★ 518same name
- guaardvark/guaardvark★ 306same name
- iha2/superlite★ 249same name
- apple-ouyang/book-to-skill★ 148same name
- jtaroreh/agystack★ 128same name
- uzairansaruzi/p3-stack★ 126same name
77 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- 60-30-10Skill
- buildSkill
- explainerSkill
- explainSkill
- icm-architectSkill
- karpathy-guidelinesSkill
- skill-tuneSkill
- weekly-signal-diff-aiSkill
- write-discoverable-codeSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
14 rules. 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 83 edited versions we read keep these.
10
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 14
Use this skill only when the user includes literal swarm as an instruction to apply this workflow, for example:
- Very specific: line 21
Do not use this skill for incidental mentions of agents, multi-agent design, orchestration, checkers, judges, Ringer, or harnesses unless …
- Very specific: line 27
If the task is not swarm-ready, return DO NOT SWARM with the smallest better alternative.
- Distinctive: line 45
If any of these are missing and cannot be inferred safely, ask one compact batch of questions before designing the swarm.
- Very specific: line 62
Use SWARM only when all are true:
- Distinctive: line 81
Prefer deterministic checks.
- Distinctive: line 93
No rank escapes verification.
- Distinctive: line 141
Do not turn every task into a swarm.
- Distinctive: line 142
Do not let worker self-reports count as proof.
- Distinctive: line 143
Do not let a persuasive explanation substitute for evidence.
- Distinctive: line 144
Do not allow external writes, sends, deletes, purchases, permission changes, production commands, or public posts without explicit …
- Distinctive: line 145
Do not hide uncertainty inside the final recommendation.
- Distinctive: line 146
Do not create a closed loop where the same agent that produced work is treated as an independent checker.
- Distinctive: line 147
If execution is requested but the available environment cannot run real parallel agents, produce pasteable worker and checker prompts …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 83 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Swarm
Invocation-only workflow for turning a bounded task into a verified swarm: planner, workers, checks, appeals, and a review packet.
The core rule: do not trust the agents. Build the institution around them.
Trigger Boundary
Use this skill only when the user includes literal swarm as an instruction to apply this workflow, for example:
swarm thisrun swarm on this workflowswarm: <task>/swarm <task>
Do not use this skill for incidental mentions of agents, multi-agent design, orchestration, checkers, judges, Ringer, or harnesses unless the user uses swarm as the invocation keyword.
Default Posture
Swarm is not the default answer. A task earns a swarm only when it can be split into bounded lanes and checked cheaply enough that parallelism reduces review burden instead of multiplying it.
If the task is not swarm-ready, return DO NOT SWARM with the smallest better alternative.
Plan-only by default. Produce SWARM PLAN; do not spawn agents, edit files, run commands, or take durable/external side effects unless the user explicitly asks to execute the plan.
Workflow
1. Capture The Job
Identify:
- goal
- source of truth
- allowed actions
- forbidden actions
- durable/external side effects
- done condition
- review budget
If any of these are missing and cannot be inferred safely, ask one compact batch of questions before designing the swarm.
2. Run The Readiness Gate
Classify the task:
SWARM: multiple bounded lanes, independent outputs, clear checks, manageable merge.SINGLE RUN: one agent/thread should do it; parallelism adds overhead.STEER FIRST: the work is still too ambiguous.DO NOT RUN: permission, source-of-truth, safety, or rollback path is missing.
Fallback routing:
SINGLE RUN: userun-kitfor a scoped run spec, proof, or cross-check.STEER FIRST: stay in conversation until the source of truth, done condition, and review budget are clear.DO NOT RUN: stop and ask for the missing authority, permission, or rollback path.
Use SWARM only when all are true:
- Work can be decomposed into lanes with explicit boundaries.
- Each lane has a concrete artifact or answer.
- Each lane has an executable, citeable, or inspectable check.
- Merge can be reviewed against a written standard.
- Side effects are gated before execution.
3. Write The Constitution
Define 5 to 14 testable rules for done-right work.
Each rule must include:
- the standard
- the evidence needed
- the check method
- who decides if the check is disputed
Prefer deterministic checks. Use LLM judges only where judgment is real and the evidence is available.
4. Design The Org Chart
Assign:
Planner: decomposes the work, writes lane specs, does not execute worker tasks by default.Workers: execute one bounded lane each; no global authority; no external side effects unless explicitly allowed.Checkers: verify worker outputs against the constitution; deterministic checks first, LLM judges second.Reviewer: merges outputs, resolves contradictions, and prepares the review packet.Owner: the human or named authority who accepts, rejects, or escalates the final result.
No rank escapes verification. Planner, worker, checker, and reviewer outputs can all be wrong.
5. Build The Appeals Path
Checks can fail incorrectly. Include a process for:
- worker retry after a valid failure
- checker correction after an invalid failure
- escalation when evidence is insufficient
- human review for high-stakes or ambiguous boundaries
The appeal must preserve the reason for the original check and the reason for changing it.
6. Produce The Review Packet
The review packet is the product. Final prose is only a receipt.
Include:
- task and scope
- constitution
- lane specs
- worker outputs or expected artifacts
- proposed checks by default; checks run only after explicit execution
- failures, retries, and appeals
- unresolved risks
- final recommendation
Output Shape
Use this heading:
SWARM PLAN
Then include:
Verdict: SWARM / SINGLE RUN / STEER FIRST / DO NOT RUNWhy: short reason for the verdictConstitution: numbered testable rulesOrg Chart: planner, workers, checkers, reviewer, ownerWorker Lanes: lane name, task, input, output, forbidden actionsChecks: proposed checks by default; commands, citation checks, deterministic checks, LLM judges, or human reviews actually run only after explicit executionAppeals: retry, checker correction, escalation pathReview Packet: what the final packet must containExecution Notes: exact next prompts, commands, or dispatch instructions if execution is requested
Guardrails
- Do not turn every task into a swarm.
- Do not let worker self-reports count as proof.
- Do not let a persuasive explanation substitute for evidence.
- Do not allow external writes, sends, deletes, purchases, permission changes, production commands, or public posts without explicit permission.
- Do not hide uncertainty inside the final recommendation.
- Do not create a closed loop where the same agent that produced work is treated as an independent checker.
- If execution is requested but the available environment cannot run real parallel agents, produce pasteable worker and checker prompts instead.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

