agentleFS
matt-intuitionmatt-intuition/claude-continuity-skills/skills/onboard/SKILL.md

onboard

Skill2 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Guided onboarding interview for the continuity workflow. Use when the user invokes `/onboard`, says "set up my workflow", "configure my platforms", "connect my tools to the daily workflow", or has just scaffolded a vault with `/vault-init` and needs a foundation manifest. Detects which MCP connectors are actually available in the session, interviews the user about their platforms (task tracker, email, calendar, docs, CRM, share-out channel), identity, timezone, and daily/weekly/monthly cadence ceremonies, then writes `local/journals/_foundation.md` and seeds `_cadence.md` in the active vault. Re-runnable to reconfigure — it updates, never blind-overwrites.

165 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use soak-test, team-live-ops and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • lilangMaxSkill

    soak-test

    Generate a soak test protocol for extended play sessions. Defines what to observe, measure, and log during long play sessions to surface slow leaks, fatigue effects, and edge cases that only appear after sustained play. Primarily used in Polish and Release phases.

    Also in 9 projects that use this

  • lilangMaxSkill

    team-live-ops

    Orchestrate the live-ops team for post-launch content planning: coordinates live-ops-designer, economy-designer, analytics-engineer, community-manager, writer, and narrative-director to design and plan a season, event, or live content update.

    Also in 9 projects that use this

  • HK-hubSkill

    teach-impeccable

    One-time setup that gathers design context for your project and saves it to your AI config file. Run once to establish persistent design guidelines.

    Also in 19 projects that use this

  • CoralGameSkill

    project-stage-detect

    Automatically analyze project state, detect stage, identify gaps, and recommend next steps based on existing artifacts.

    Also in 15 projects that use this

  • CoralGameSkill

    team-level

    Orchestrate level design team: level-designer + narrative-director + world-builder + art-director + systems-designer + qa-tester for complete area/level creation.

    Also in 11 projects that use this

  • +5 more from lilangMax
  • +2 more from CoralGame

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 153 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    No vault is resolvable (no .claude-vault.json walking up from CWD) → run /vault-init first.

    line 19
  2. Distinctive:

    "None" is always a valid answer: Every capability degrades gracefully (the commands document their fallbacks).

    line 26
  3. Distinctive:

    Ask in one message: preferred name, timezone (IANA name.

    line 42
  4. Distinctive:

    Ask for 2–5 stable workstream headings for the daily wrap-up's tracking layer ("the buckets your work falls into — keep the names stable, …

    line 67

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 153 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

onboard

The intelligent first-run (and re-run) configurator. Everything the workflow commands need to know about this user's system lands in one place — the foundation manifest (local/journals/_foundation.md) — so the commands stay generic and the configuration stays personal.

When to trigger

  • User invokes /onboard
  • User says "set up my workflow" / "configure my platforms" / "help me connect my tools"
  • /vault-init just finished and offered onboarding as the next step
  • A workflow command reported "no foundation file — running vault-only" and the user wants to fix that

When NOT to trigger

  • No vault is resolvable (no .claude-vault.json walking up from CWD) → run /vault-init first; say so and stop.
  • The user only wants to change one value ("switch my share-out channel to Discord") → just edit _foundation.md directly; the full interview is overkill.

Principles

  • Interview, don't interrogate. Batch related questions into a handful of messages (identity → platforms → cadence → workstreams). Use the ask-user question tool with concrete options where available; free-text otherwise. Never ask one question per message for ten messages.
  • Detect before asking. Pre-fill the platform table from what's actually connected (step 2) and present it for confirmation — "I can see Linear and Gmail MCPs connected; want them as your task tracker and email?" beats a blank questionnaire.
  • "None" is always a valid answer. Every capability degrades gracefully (the commands document their fallbacks). Never pressure the user toward a tool.
  • Update, never blind-overwrite. On re-run, read the existing _foundation.md first, present current values, and change only what the user changes. Same for _cadence.md rows.
  • One fact, one home. The foundation holds what you use and your rhythm; _cadence.md holds the dispatch rules derived from that rhythm; the commands hold the procedure. Don't restate command behavior into the foundation file.

Step-by-step

1. Resolve the vault

Walk up from CWD for .claude-vault.json (same algorithm as every workflow command). No marker → stop and point at /vault-init. If local/journals/_foundation.md already exists, read it — this is a reconfigure run: show the current settings compactly and ask what to change; skip straight to the sections being changed.

2. Detect available MCP connectors

Inspect which MCP tools are actually present in this session (tool listings / a tool search for the common servers — Linear, Jira, GitHub, Gmail, Google Calendar, Notion, Google Drive, HubSpot, Slack). Build a short detected-list. Do not call any of them yet — presence is enough. Note that MCP servers configured on the user's account but not loaded in this session may not appear; the user can override detection.

3. Interview — identity

Ask in one message: preferred name, timezone (IANA name; offer the system timezone as the default), working hours, and company/domain (used by the inbox scan's signal filter; optional).

4. Interview — platforms & sources of truth

Present one capability table, pre-filled from step 2, and confirm/correct each row:

CapabilityWhat it powersTypical options
Task trackerMorning focus pull, ticket-first work capture, evening reconciliation sweepLinear · Jira · GitHub Issues · none
EmailMorning inbox scan; sent-mail verification of "sent" claimsGmail · none
CalendarCadence evaluation (meeting-driven triggers), day's plate cross-referencingGoogle Calendar · none
Docs / knowledge baseWhere durable docs live; count/state verificationNotion · Google Docs · vault-only
CRMDeal/relationship stage verificationHubSpot · none
Share-out channelThe format of the daily wrap-up's copy-paste draftSlack · Discord · email · none

For each declared platform, also confirm the MCP status (connected / planned / manual-only). A platform the user uses but has no MCP for is recorded as MCP: no — commands will treat claims against it as unverified rather than silently skipping the concept.

Briefly state the consequence of each choice as it's made ("no task tracker → your morning plate builds from open-threads and yesterday's handoff instead").

5. Interview — cadence ceremonies

Ask about the rhythm in one batch: weekly ceremonies (which day, what's due, who reads it), any sprint/cycle structure (anchor date + length), monthly ceremonies, and meeting-driven rituals (prep docs before external calls? follow-up notes after?). Daily morning/evening rows are standing defaults — mention them, don't ask.

6. Interview — workstreams (and optional targets)

Ask for 2–5 stable workstream headings for the daily wrap-up's tracking layer ("the buckets your work falls into — keep the names stable, they key the weekly rollup"). Optionally: measured targets per workstream for the scoreboard; skip freely.

7. Write the files

  • local/journals/_foundation.md — from ~/.claude/skills/vault-init/assets/_foundation.template.md, with every interviewed value filled in and the HTML comments removed from filled rows. On a reconfigure run, edit the existing file in place.
  • local/journals/_cadence.md — create from the template if missing (vault-init normally already did). Translate the step-5 answers into rows: day-of-week table, evening-verification rows for anything with a hard "due" (each check needs an "if missed" action), cycle anchor, calendar-driven rows (only if a calendar is declared). Keep the standing daily rows. On re-run, reconcile rows — update changed ones, keep manual rows the user added.

8. Dry-run the gates (the payoff)

Close with a concrete readout of what the configuration means — one line per command, derived from the actual declarations, e.g.:

With this setup:
- /daily-session will pull your morning plate from Jira, scan Gmail for signal mail,
  and check Google Calendar for meeting-driven cadence rows.
- /checkpoint will sync ticket status to Jira and verify "sent" claims against Gmail sent mail.
- /end-day will format your daily wrap-up share draft for Discord, grouped under:
  Product · Customers · Ops/Other.
- No CRM declared — deal-stage claims will be written as unverified if they ever come up.
Change anything any time: edit local/journals/_foundation.md or re-run /onboard.
  • Offer /daily-session --light as the immediate next step to see the configuration in action.

Notes

  • This skill writes ONLY inside the active vault (local/journals/). It never edits the user-level commands, hooks, or any global config.
  • The foundation gates control what gets read and verified — they never authorize outward-facing sends; those keep their own approval flows in the commands.
  • Deleting _foundation.md is a safe reset: every command degrades to vault-only behavior and re-suggests /onboard.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.