agentleFS
matrixoriginmatrixorigin/Memoria/.cursor/rules/memory-branching-patterns.mdc

Memoria / rules

Cursor rule624 starsChanged 6 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

USE WHEN evaluating technologies, isolating risky memory changes, or comparing alternative approaches using memory branches

  • Where files are headingNew Cursor rule files have more rules about planning and tracking tasks, and fewer about code style.

    Of the Cursor rule files we read, the 4,183 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.

  • In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this memory-branching-patterns.mdc into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use Memoria's Git-like branching to isolate experiments, evaluate alternatives, and protect stable memory state.

    line 11
  2. Very specific:

    When only part of a branch should land on main, or you want conflict-by-conflict control, prefer memory_apply over merging the whole branch.

    line 89
  3. Very specific:

    Use memory_merge only when the entire branch should land together.

    line 107
  4. Very specific:

    Always delete branches after merge or abandonment.

    line 127
  5. Very specific:

    Use replace when the branch contains validated corrections.

    line 134

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 6,668 Cursor rule files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
memory-branching-patterns.mdc
---
description: USE WHEN evaluating technologies, isolating risky memory changes, or comparing alternative approaches using memory branches
globs:
alwaysApply: false
---

<!-- memoria-version: 0.2.3-->

# Memory Branching Patterns

Use Memoria's Git-like branching to isolate experiments, evaluate alternatives, and protect stable memory state.

## Pattern 1: Tech Evaluation

Compare alternatives without polluting main memory.

```
memory_branch(name="eval_[technology]")
memory_checkout(name="eval_[technology]")

# Store findings on branch
memory_store(content="[technology] evaluation: [findings]", memory_type="semantic")

# When done — preview and decide
memory_diff(source="eval_[technology]")

# Accept: merge back
memory_checkout(name="main")
memory_merge(source="eval_[technology]", strategy="replace")
memory_branch_delete(name="eval_[technology]")

# Reject: just delete
memory_checkout(name="main")
memory_branch_delete(name="eval_[technology]")
```

## Pattern 2: Pre-Refactor Safety Net

Snapshot + branch before risky memory changes.

```
memory_snapshot(name="pre_[task]", description="before [task]")
memory_branch(name="refactor_[task]")
memory_checkout(name="refactor_[task]")

# Do risky work on branch...

# If it goes wrong:
memory_checkout(name="main")
memory_branch_delete(name="refactor_[task]")
# main is untouched

# If it succeeds:
memory_diff(source="refactor_[task]")
memory_checkout(name="main")
memory_merge(source="refactor_[task]")  # default strategy: branch wins on conflicts
memory_branch_delete(name="refactor_[task]")
```

## Pattern 3: A/B Memory Comparison

Two branches for competing approaches, diff both before deciding.

```
memory_branch(name="approach_a")
memory_branch(name="approach_b")

# Work on A
memory_checkout(name="approach_a")
memory_store(content="Approach A: [details]", memory_type="semantic")

# Work on B
memory_checkout(name="approach_b")
memory_store(content="Approach B: [details]", memory_type="semantic")

# Compare
memory_diff(source="approach_a")
memory_diff(source="approach_b")

# Merge winner, delete both
memory_checkout(name="main")
memory_merge(source="approach_a")  # default strategy: branch wins on conflicts
memory_branch_delete(name="approach_a")
memory_branch_delete(name="approach_b")
```

## Pattern 4: Selective Apply

When only part of a branch should land on `main`, or you want conflict-by-conflict control, prefer `memory_apply` over merging the whole branch.

```
memory_diff(source="experiment_notes")

# Promote only the selected changes
memory_apply(
  source="experiment_notes",
  adds=["mem_new_1"],
  updates=[{"old_id": "mem_old_1", "new_id": "mem_new_1"}],
  removes=["mem_delete_1"],
  accept_branch_conflicts=["mem_conflict_1"]
)
```

Rules:
- Omit an item from `adds` / `updates` / `removes` to leave `main` unchanged for that item.
- Omit a conflict from `accept_branch_conflicts` to keep the `main` version.
- Use `memory_merge` only when the entire branch should land together.

## When to Branch

- ✅ Evaluating a technology, framework, or architecture change
- ✅ About to bulk-correct or purge many memories
- ✅ User says "let's try something different" or "what if we..."
- ✅ Exploring a hypothesis that might be wrong
- ❌ Simple fact storage — just use main
- ❌ Quick corrections — use `memory_correct` directly

## Naming Convention

- `eval_[thing]` — technology/approach evaluation
- `refactor_[task]` — risky memory restructuring
- `goal_[name]_iter_[N]` — goal iteration (see goal-driven-evolution)
- `experiment_[topic]` — open-ended exploration

## Cleanup

Always delete branches after merge or abandonment. Check with `memory_branches()` periodically. Stale branches waste cognitive overhead when listed.

## Merge Strategies

- `replace` (default, also called `accept`): branch wins on conflicts — if the same memory exists on both main and branch, the branch version replaces main's
- `append`: skip-on-conflict — only adds new memories from branch, never overwrites existing main memories

Use `replace` when the branch contains validated corrections. Use `append` when the branch only adds new information and you want to preserve main's existing state. If you only want part of a branch, use `memory_apply` instead of either merge strategy.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.