triage-task
Skill1 starsChanged 44 days agoMITView on GitHub
Reads a ticket from Jira or Azure DevOps and writes .workflow/<KEY>/triage.json. Use when asked what to work on, to pick up a ticket by key, or to understand its description, comments and blocking links.
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- address-reviewSkill
- draft-prSkill
- frame-productSkill
- implement-changeSkill
- plan-changeSkill
- review-diffSkill
- trace-incidentSkill
- write-commitSkill
- write-handoverSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
All tracker access goes through one command.
- Very specific: line 24
No tracker in this repo? task new "title" --type bug|feature|chore|support records it in the local backlog and everything downstream works …
- Very specific: line 26
Only local contexts accept it.
- Very specific: line 35
Use --depth 0 when the ticket is self-contained and links do not matter.
- Very specific: line 36
Use --depth 2 only when a blocker or a parent decides the approach.
- Very specific: line 51
Check
_unmappedand_truncated: if present. _unmapped means the tracker had a link type or field this version does not model — say so … - Distinctive: line 56
Report gaps before planning: If the ticket lacks acceptance criteria, a reproduction, or a decision someone else owns, list those questions …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
triage-task
All tracker access goes through one command. Never construct JQL, WIQL, URLs or field lists — the provider builds them from the resolved context.
wb <args> # wb not on PATH: python <this skill's directory>/../../lib/wb.py <args>Steps
- Key given? Go straight to step 2:
start <KEY>resumes as well as starts. With no key,statuslists every ticket with work in flight and the one command that moves each on. No key given —
task list. Four columns, newest first. Show them and ask which one, unless the request already names one.No tracker in this repo?
task new "title" --type bug|feature|chore|supportrecords it in the local backlog and everything downstream works unchanged. Only local contexts accept it;wbsays so if the repo has a real tracker.Pick it up —
start <KEY>. Reads the ticket into.workflow/<KEY>/triage.jsonand prints its text, puts the checkout on the ticket's branch, and ends with the route and the one next command. Rerun it any time: it is a no-op that says where the ticket stands. To read without branching, or deeper, usetask get <KEY>— depth 1 by default: the task, plus one line per linked item.- Use
--depth 0when the ticket is self-contained and links do not matter. - Use
--depth 2only when a blocker or a parent decides the approach. It fetches bodies for blocking and hierarchy links, never forrelates.
Light path (the route says so): no plan, no other skill, no
status. Make the change and a test that covers it, thenfinish <KEY> -m "<type>: <summary>" --commit. It runs the suite, the regression check and the message check itself, so do not run them first; on a pass it commits exactly the checked files. If it says the work outgrew the path, continue withplan-change.- Use
- Go deeper only where it pays — the
_expandlist names what exists but was not included. Pass a handle back verbatim:task get <KEY> --expand comments:all. Do not compose handles; anything not in_expandis rejected. - Check
_unmappedand_truncatedif present._unmappedmeans the tracker had a link type or field this version does not model — say so rather than guessing what it meant._truncatedmeans content was capped, and names the handle that would retrieve it. - Report gaps before planning. If the ticket lacks acceptance criteria, a
reproduction, or a decision someone else owns, list those questions plainly.
A blocked-by link that is not Done is a gap, not a detail. Write them to
.workflow/<KEY>/questions.mdand say the ticket is not ready to plan.
Rules
- Report what the ticket says, not what it probably means. Missing information is a finding to report, never a blank to fill.
- Quote the
keyin every claim so later steps can check it. - One tracker per context, resolved automatically. If
wbreports no context, relay its fix lines — do not guess a project or a URL.
Next, on the standard route: plan-change reads the artifact this produced.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

