agentleFS
maskshellmaskshell/solidforge-pi/CLAUDE.md

solidforge-pi

CLAUDE.md1 starsChanged 37 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Red lines that cannot be encoded as deterministic architecture-contract rules live here. These are Blockers: a violation returns the work for rewrite. Codable red lines (circular dependencies, layer isolation, concurrency baselines) are enforced deterministically by the inner Architecture-Contract Gate — do not duplicate them here; declare them in the project's arch-contract config (.importlinter.ini / .dependency-cruiser.cjs / .swiftlint.yml). When a Reviewer flags one of these, the convergence loop treats it as an outer- ring Blocker and returns the change for rewrite…

The file

We split this CLAUDE.md into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    No emergent coupling: two modules that are not explicitly wired must not secretly depend on each other's internal behavior or ordering.

    line 7
  2. Distinctive:

    All authentication/authorization that cannot be statically proven to flow through the unified gateway is a Blocker.

    line 9
  3. Distinctive:

    When a Reviewer flags one of these, the convergence loop treats it as an outer- ring Blocker and returns the change for rewrite — not a …

    line 11

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 26,980 CLAUDE.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
CLAUDE.md

L1 Constitution (uncodable red lines)

Red lines that cannot be encoded as deterministic architecture-contract rules live here. These are Blockers: a violation returns the work for rewrite. Codable red lines (circular dependencies, layer isolation, concurrency baselines) are enforced deterministically by the inner Architecture-Contract Gate — do not duplicate them here; declare them in the project's arch-contract config (.importlinter.ini / .dependency-cruiser.cjs / .swiftlint.yml).

  • Abstraction level must be appropriate: a helper must not leak domain logic into a generic utility, and a high-level policy must not reach into a low-level primitive directly.
  • Naming must reflect intent, not implementation accident. A name that contradicts what the code does is a Blocker.
  • No emergent coupling: two modules that are not explicitly wired must not secretly depend on each other's internal behavior or ordering.
  • No "delete the error" fixes: removing a failing module, hardcoding a value to turn a test green, or wrapping logic in a bare catch to silence a failure are Blockers (the fast gate + blueprint diff catch most of these).
  • All authentication/authorization that cannot be statically proven to flow through the unified gateway is a Blocker.

When a Reviewer flags one of these, the convergence loop treats it as an outer- ring Blocker and returns the change for rewrite — not a Warning.

Deterministic Gate Toolchain

The convergence-loop gates degrade gracefully and never report a silent green when a tool is absent. To arm them on a new machine or in CI, restore/install the gate tools for the ecosystems this project uses:

  • Web: npm ci — dependency-cruiser / eslint are in devDependencies

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.