contribution
Skill8 starsChanged 55 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use this skill when guiding a contributor through this repository's contribution workflow. It follows CONTRIBUTING.md and repository conventions to help the agent clone, create skills, validate, and submit PRs correctly.
- Reads credentials
- Commits and pushes
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- protocol/peruntheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- remigiusz-antczak/deep-code-reviewtheir own version, first seen Oct 16, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- protocol/perun★ 2same name
- remigiusz-antczak/deep-code-review★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.
- code-reviewSkill
- contributeSkill
- documentationSkill
- multi-agentsSkill
- multi-tenantSkill
- project-architectureSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
19 rules. About 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈11
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
8
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Distinctive: line 12
Ensure contributions are consistent, well-structured, and merge-ready by grounding the agent in the repository's actual rules rather than …
- Distinctive: line 19
Before the agent commits, pushes, or opens a PR in this repo
- Distinctive: line 40
Ensure working from latest main:
- Distinctive: line 51
Check root README.md → Available Skills table for naming collisions
- Distinctive: line 80
Keep the skill independent and reusable.
- Distinctive: line 84
If adding a skill: add a row to README.md → Available Skills table
- Distinctive: line 90
Add installation examples for the new skill:
- Distinctive: line 100
Run these before committing:
- Distinctive: line 128
Create a topic branch from main:
- Distinctive: line 134
Commit with Conventional Commits:
- Very specific: line 160
If gh is not authenticated, instruct the user to run gh auth login and retry.
- Very specific: line 164
When configured, send the SKILL.md diff + intent + validation results to jev_review.
- Distinctive: line 172
Follow CONTRIBUTING.md first: If this skill and CONTRIBUTING.md disagree, CONTRIBUTING.md wins — update this skill to match.
- Very specific: line 175
Validate file paths: Use forward slashes, skills/<name>/SKILL.md exactly.
- Very specific: line 180
Do NOT overwrite origin or upstream remotes without asking
- Very specific: line 181
Do NOT commit secrets, tokens, .env, or private URLs
- Very specific: line 182
Do NOT change LICENSE or .gitignore unless explicitly requested
- Very specific: line 183
Do NOT create a skill without name ≡ directory-name invariant
- Very specific: line 184
Do NOT invent a CONTRIBUTING.md workflow that contradicts the actual file in the repo
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Contribution
Teaches an AI agent how to contribute correctly to this repository (agents-skills), following its own conventions.
Purpose
Ensure contributions are consistent, well-structured, and merge-ready by grounding the agent in the repository's actual rules rather than generic GitHub advice. Reduces review churn and keeps the skill catalog coherent.
When to Use
- User says they want to contribute, add a skill, fix a skill, or open a PR against this repo
- User asks "how do I contribute?", "how do I add a new skill?", "what are the conventions?"
- Agent is about to scaffold a new
skills/<name>/SKILL.mdin this repository - Before the agent commits, pushes, or opens a PR in this repo
Workflow
1. Orient the contributor and set up the workspace
- Confirm the repo root is
agents-skills(containsskills/,CONTRIBUTING.md,README.md) If cloning fresh:
git clone https://github.com/marwan562/agents-skills.git cd agents-skillsFor fork workflow, verify remotes:
git remote -v # expect origin -> contributor fork, upstream -> marwan562/agents-skillsEnsure working from latest
main:git checkout main git fetch upstream # or origin if no upstream git pull --ff-only
2. Read the source of truth
- Open and follow
CONTRIBUTING.md(the canonical workflow) anddocs/architecture.md(why the layout is this way) - Check root
README.md→ Available Skills table for naming collisions - Inspect
skills/<existing>/SKILL.mdcount and style to match tone - Note commit convention (Conventional Commits) and branch naming (
feat/<skill>,fix/<skill>-...)
3. Plan the change
- For new skill: propose
kebab-casename, verify it matches directory, draftdescription(20-300 chars, trigger style: "Use when...") - For fix/docs: identify the minimal diff; note if
README.mdcatalog ordocs/architecture.mdalso needs an update - For large or cross-cutting change: advise opening an issue first (
Proposal: <skill-name> skill) before coding — perCONTRIBUTING.md
4. Scaffold or edit
New skill:
mkdir -p skills/my-new-skill # Create skills/my-new-skill/SKILL.md with required frontmatterFrontmatter must be at line 1:
--- name: my-new-skill description: Use when you need to do X efficiently ---- Body sections in order:
Purpose→When to Use→Workflow→Instructions→Constraints→Examples(plus optionalReferences) - Keep the skill independent and reusable; no hard dependency on another skill without declaration
5. Update catalog and cross-references
If adding a skill: add a row to
README.md→ Available Skills table| **my-new-skill** | `skills/my-new-skill/` | Short purpose summary |Add installation examples for the new skill:
npx skills add marwan562/agents-skills --skill my-new-skill- Adjust structure diagrams if needed; do not restructure unrelated sections
6. Validate locally (never skip)
Run these before committing:
# 1. Each skill has SKILL.md and name matches directory
for f in skills/*/SKILL.md; do
dir=$(basename $(dirname "$f"))
name=$(grep "^name:" "$f" | awk '{print $2}')
[ "$dir" = "$name" ] && echo "✓ $f" || echo "✗ MISMATCH $f dir=$dir name=$name"
done
# 2. No secrets / tokens in diff
git diff --cached # review; ensure no .env, keys, tokens
# 3. Frontmatter parses
python3 -c "
import pathlib, yaml
for p in pathlib.Path('skills').glob('*/SKILL.md'):
data = yaml.safe_load(p.read_text().split('---')[1])
assert 'name' in data and 'description' in data
print(f'✓ {p}')
"
# 4. Links resolve
# Click through README links to CONTRIBUTING.md and docs/architecture.md7. Commit, push, and open PR
Create a topic branch from
main:git checkout -b feat/my-new-skillCommit with Conventional Commits:
git add skills/my-new-skill/SKILL.md README.md git commit -m "feat(my-new-skill): add my-new-skill skill"Push and open PR:
git push -u origin feat/my-new-skill gh pr create --title "feat(my-new-skill): add my-new-skill skill" --body "$(cat <<'EOF' ## Summary Adds `my-new-skill`... ## Changes - ... ## Validation - [x] Frontmatter valid - [x] No secrets in diff - [x] Links checked EOF )"- If
ghis not authenticated, instruct the user to rungh auth loginand retry; do not fabricate a PR URL
8. Optional Jev pre-PR check (skipped without JEV_API_KEY)
When configured, send the SKILL.md diff + intent + validation results to
jev_review; fix concrete flags, re-validate, rescore with
previousEvaluation. CONTRIBUTING.md and the validator still decide. Never
send secrets. Full protocol:
contribute Jev gates.
Instructions
- Follow CONTRIBUTING.md first. If this skill and CONTRIBUTING.md disagree, CONTRIBUTING.md wins — update this skill to match.
- Keep diffs minimal. One skill per PR; do not bundle unrelated reformatting.
- Preserve existing style. Mirror headings, tone, and table formatting from existing skills.
- Validate file paths. Use forward slashes,
skills/<name>/SKILL.mdexactly; do not createskill/orSKILL.MD. - Warn before external actions. Confirm with the user before
git pushorgh pr create— these are public and irreversible.
Constraints
- Do NOT overwrite
originorupstreamremotes without asking - Do NOT commit secrets, tokens,
.env, or private URLs - Do NOT change
LICENSEor.gitignoreunless explicitly requested - Do NOT create a skill without
name≡ directory-name invariant - Do NOT invent a
CONTRIBUTING.mdworkflow that contradicts the actual file in the repo
Examples
Example 1 — Contributor wants to add a skill
User: "I want to add a
testingskill to this repo."
Agent:
- Reads
CONTRIBUTING.md:1-50, checksskills/for collision (testingnot present) - Scaffolds
skills/testing/SKILL.mdwith required sections - Updates
README.mdAvailable Skills table - Runs validation loop; shows
git diff --statand asks confirmation before push
Example 2 — Quick fix to an existing skill
User: "Fix a typo in the
code-reviewskill."
Agent:
- Reads
skills/code-review/SKILL.md:45, patches typo - Validates frontmatter still parses,
nameunchanged - Commits as
fix(code-review): correct typo in workflow step 3 - Pushes only after confirmation
Example 3 — Contributor asks how to contribute
User: "How do I contribute here?"
Agent:
- Summarizes
CONTRIBUTING.md: clone → createskills/<name>/SKILL.md→ validate → commit (feat:) → PR - Shows scaffold command and validation checklist
- Points to
docs/architecture.mdfor deeper design rationale
References
- Canonical workflow:
CONTRIBUTING.md - Architecture rationale:
docs/architecture.md - Skill spec and install guide:
README.md
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

