epic-walkthrough
Skill94 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generate comprehensive walkthrough documentation and trigger self-improvement for epic workflows. Create walkthrough.md documenting the epic journey and trigger workflow audit/healing for continuous improvement. Use the template at .spec-flow/templates/epic/walkthrough.md as the base structure. Template variables (replace with actual values): - {{EPICTITLE}}, {{EPICNUMBER}}, {{EPICSLUG}} - {{STARTDATE}}, {{ENDDATE}}, {{DURATIONDAYS}}, {{DURATIONHOURS}} - {{SPRINTCOUNT}}, {{TASKSCOMPLETED}} - {{EXPECTEDVELOCITY}}, {{ACTUAL_VELOCITY}} - Phase durations, sprint details, quality gate results - File change statistics, deployment information Data sources: - state.yaml - Phase timestamps, sprint status - epic-spec.md - Business…
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 7
Create walkthrough.md documenting the epic journey and trigger workflow audit/healing for continuous improvement.
- Distinctive: line 12
After deployment completes successfully
- Very specific: line 17
Use the template at .spec-flow/templates/epic/walkthrough.md as the base structure.
- Distinctive: line 149
Update skills based on learnings
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Epic Walkthrough Skill
Generate comprehensive walkthrough documentation and trigger self-improvement for epic workflows.
Purpose
Create walkthrough.md documenting the epic journey and trigger workflow audit/healing for continuous improvement.
When to Invoke
- During
/epicStep 8 (Finalization phase) - After deployment completes successfully
- Via
/finalizecommand
Template Reference
Use the template at .spec-flow/templates/epic/walkthrough.md as the base structure.
Template variables (replace with actual values):
{{EPIC_TITLE}},{{EPIC_NUMBER}},{{EPIC_SLUG}}{{START_DATE}},{{END_DATE}},{{DURATION_DAYS}},{{DURATION_HOURS}}{{SPRINT_COUNT}},{{TASKS_COMPLETED}}{{EXPECTED_VELOCITY}},{{ACTUAL_VELOCITY}}- Phase durations, sprint details, quality gate results
- File change statistics, deployment information
Data sources:
state.yaml- Phase timestamps, sprint statusepic-spec.md- Business value, constraintssprint-plan.md- Sprint dependencies, estimatesoptimization-report.md- Quality gate resultsgit log- Commit history, file statistics
Walkthrough Structure
<walkthrough>
<overview>
<epic_goal>...</epic_goal>
<business_value>...</business_value>
<duration>Start: 2025-11-19, End: 2025-11-25 (6 days)</duration>
<velocity>Expected: 3x, Actual: 4.2x</velocity>
</overview>
<phases_completed>
<phase name="research">
<duration>2 hours</duration>
<key_findings>OAuth 2.1 recommended, JWT tokens for sessions</key_findings>
<artifacts>research.md, API contracts locked</artifacts>
</phase>
<phase name="planning">
<duration>1.5 hours</duration>
<key_decisions>PostgreSQL for sessions, httpOnly cookies</key_decisions>
<artifacts>plan.md, sprint-plan.md</artifacts>
</phase>
<phase name="implementation">
<duration>16 hours</duration>
<sprints_completed>S01 (8h), S02 (12h), S03 (6h)</sprints_completed>
<artifacts>Implementation in sprints/S01, S02, S03</artifacts>
</phase>
<phase name="optimization">
<duration>2 hours</duration>
<quality_gates>All passed (tests, security, performance, accessibility)</quality_gates>
<artifacts>optimization-report.xml</artifacts>
</phase>
</phases_completed>
<validation>
<quality_gates>
<gate name="tests" status="passed">98% coverage, 142/142 passing</gate>
<gate name="security" status="passed">0 critical, 2 medium (triaged)</gate>
<gate name="performance" status="passed">API p95: 87ms (target: <200ms)</gate>
<gate name="accessibility" status="passed">WCAG 2.1 AA compliant</gate>
</quality_gates>
<deployment>
<staging>Deployed v1.5.0-rc.1, validated 2025-11-24</staging>
<production>Promoted to v1.5.0, deployed 2025-11-25</production>
</deployment>
</validation>
<key_files_modified>
<category name="backend">
<file path="src/auth/middleware.ts">JWT validation middleware</file>
<file path="src/auth/service.ts">OAuth 2.1 integration</file>
</category>
<category name="frontend">
<file path="components/LoginForm.tsx">OAuth login flow</file>
<file path="hooks/useAuth.ts">Auth state management</file>
</category>
<category name="infrastructure">
<file path="migrations/20251119_sessions.sql">Session table</file>
<file path="contracts/api/auth-v1.yaml">Auth API contract</file>
</category>
</key_files_modified>
<next_steps>
<future_enhancement priority="high">Add MFA support</future_enhancement>
<future_enhancement priority="medium">Social login</future_enhancement>
<technical_debt>Token refresh uses polling (should use refresh tokens)</technical_debt>
<monitoring>Watch auth_failures_total metric</monitoring>
</next_steps>
<summary>
<what_worked>
- Parallel sprint execution saved 8 hours
- API contract locking prevented integration bugs
- Meta-prompting research identified OAuth 2.1 early
</what_worked>
<what_struggled>
- Sprint S02 took 12h vs 8h estimated
- Cookie SameSite policy required research
</what_struggled>
<lessons_learned>
- Lock contracts before parallel work
- Research phase crucial for architectural decisions
- Parallel execution 4.2x faster than sequential
</lessons_learned>
<velocity_impact>
Expected: 3x faster
Actual: 4.2x faster
Reason: S02/S03 ran 60% parallel
</velocity_impact>
</summary>
</walkthrough>Self-Improvement Actions
1. Run post-mortem audit:
/audit-workflow2. Pattern detection (after 2-3 epics):
- Analyze completed epics for recurring patterns
- Detect code generation opportunities
- Suggest custom skills for detected patterns
- Generate project-specific commands/hooks
3. Self-healing:
/heal-workflow- Apply approved workflow improvements
- Update skills based on learnings
4. Update documentation:
- CHANGELOG.md
- README.md
- Project CLAUDE.md (add epic summary)
5. Archive epic artifacts:
- Move prompts to completed/
- Mark epic complete in state.yaml
Outputs
walkthrough.md- Comprehensive epic summaryworkflow-improvements.xml- Self-improvement suggestions- Updated project documentation
State Updates
After finalization:
phases:
finalization:
status: completed
completed_at: { ISO_TIMESTAMP }
epic:
status: completed
completed_at: { ISO_TIMESTAMP }
velocity_actual: 4.2Velocity Tracking
Metrics captured:
- Expected vs actual sprint durations
- Parallel execution efficiency
- Quality gate pass rates
- Deployment success rate
Used for:
- Future epic estimation
- Workflow optimization
- Pattern detection for self-improvement
In this repository48 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .codex/Agents.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- analysis-phaseSkill
- anti-duplicationSkill
- audit-claude-mdSkill
- breaking-change-detectorSkill
- caching-strategySkill
- clarification-phaseSkill
- create-agent-skillsSkill
- create-hooksSkill
- create-meta-promptsSkill
- create-slash-commandsSkill
- create-subagentsSkill
- debug-phaseSkill
- dependency-conflict-resolverSkill
- design-tokensSkill
- domain-memorySkill
- dry-runSkill
- epic-meta-promptingSkill
- epic-scopingSkill
- epic-sprintsSkill
- error-recoverySkill
- finalize-phaseSkill
- git-workflow-enforcerSkill
- hallucination-detectorSkill
- implementation-phaseSkill
- mockup-extractionSkill
- multi-agent-votingSkill
- optimization-phaseSkill
- parallel-execution-optimizerSkill
- planning-phaseSkill
- production-deployment-phaseSkill
- project-initialization-phaseSkill
- regression-test-generatorSkill
- roadmap-integrationSkill
- session-boundarySkill
- shadcn-integrationSkill
- specification-phaseSkill
- staging-deployment-phaseSkill
- staging-validation-phaseSkill
- task-breakdown-phaseSkill
- task-status-syncSkill
- theme-consistencySkill
- ultrathinkSkill
- workflow-detectionSkill
- worktree-contextSkill
- x-announcementSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

