repo-hygiene
Skill4 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub
Periodic repository health check — dependencies, git, CI/CD, code quality, docs, security. Use when: onboarding to a repo, weekly maintenance, after big refactors, before audits, "is this repo in good shape?". Triggers: "repo hygiene", "health check", "repo health", "clean up repo", "maintenance check", "audit repo", "repo audit".
- Reads credentials
- Installs packages
- Commits and pushes
15 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Smaui94/ClaudeSkillCollectiontheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- robinbril/claude-code-harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- yunsii/wezdecktheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- arndvs/ctrlshfttheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- talas9/anti-halltheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- Donemeb/Donemeb-Skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use systematic-debugging.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
OpenAISkillsystematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions15 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 15
- baseballyama/rsvelte★ 249same name
- marcoguillermaz/Tierward★ 4same name
- yunsii/wezdeck★ 4same name
- robinbril/claude-code-harness★ 3same name
- rikvanriel/code-hygiene★ 2same name
- talas9/anti-hall★ 2same name
- Asher-Plihal/claude-skills★ 1same name
- jedarden/jeds-curated-skills★ 1same name
- SamuelNDCE/ai-workbench★ 1same name
- SamuelNDCE/claude-super-skill-library★ 1same name
5 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- azcliSkill
- gcloudSkill
- pm2Skill
- pre-releaseSkill
- sheet-modelSkill
- vhsSkill
- web-searchSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
20 rules. 0 are common, 12 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 14 edited versions we read keep these.
12
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
8
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 23
After a large refactor or dependency upgrade
- Distinctive: line 24
Before starting a new feature sprint
- Distinctive: line 25
When CI starts failing mysteriously
- Distinctive: line 26
After a team member leaves and you inherit their repo
- Distinctive: line 139
Must include (per stack):
- Distinctive: line 332
When the user approves the report, offer to update the baseline.
- Distinctive: line 396
Start at 10, apply deductions, floor at 0.
- Distinctive: line 410
After presenting the report, offer to fix issues that are safe and mechanical.
- Distinctive: line 415
Delete merged local branches (git branch -d)
- Very specific: line 416
Run npm audit fix (compatible fixes only, not --force)
- Very specific: line 418
Add missing .gitignore patterns
- Very specific: line 419
Add .editorconfig from template
- Very specific: line 420
Remove console.log from source files
- Very specific: line 421
Create .env.example from .env (with values replaced by <REPLACE_ME>)
- Very specific: line 422
Add missing package.json fields (description, repository, keywords)
- Distinctive: line 427
Delete merged remote branches (git push origin --delete)
- Very specific: line 428
Run npm audit fix --force (may have breaking changes)
- Distinctive: line 431
Update CI action pinning (must verify correct SHAs)
- Very specific: line 448
Pair with pre-release: Run repo-hygiene for ongoing health, pre-release when you're ready to ship.
- Distinctive: line 449
New repos start clean: Run this right after git init to establish a perfect baseline.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 14 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
repo-hygiene — Repository Health Check
A structured, periodic health check for repositories. Run anytime to detect drift, accumulation of tech debt, and configuration issues before they become problems.
Not a release gate. For pre-release checks, use the pre-release skill instead.
This skill is for ongoing maintenance — run it weekly, after major refactors, when
onboarding to a repo, or whenever things feel "off".
When to Use
- Onboarding to a new (or forgotten) repo — "what shape is this in?"
- Weekly/monthly maintenance sweep
- After a large refactor or dependency upgrade
- Before starting a new feature sprint
- When CI starts failing mysteriously
- After a team member leaves and you inherit their repo
Supported Stacks
| Stack | Package manager | Detected by |
| Node.js / TypeScript | npm | package.json + package-lock.json |
| Python | uv / pip | pyproject.toml or requirements.txt |
| Go | go modules | go.mod |
Detect the stack from the project root. Multiple stacks in one repo is fine — run applicable checks for each. If the stack isn't listed, skip stack-specific checks and run the universal ones (git, CI, docs, security).
The Workflow
Step 0: Detect Project
# What are we working with?
ls package.json pyproject.toml go.mod 2>/dev/null
git rev-parse --show-toplevelDetermine: stack(s), git remote, default branch, CI system (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, etc.).
Step 1: Dependency Health
Node.js / npm
| # | Check | Command | Severity |
| D1 | Known vulnerabilities | npm audit --json | 🔴 critical/high = Fix Now, moderate = Fix Soon |
| D2 | Outdated dependencies | npm outdated --json | 🟡 major bumps = Fix Soon, minor/patch = Info |
| D3 | Unused dependencies | npx depcheck --json | 🟡 Fix Soon |
| D4 | Phantom dependencies (used but undeclared) | npx depcheck --json → missing | 🔴 Fix Now |
| D5 | Lockfile freshness | See below | 🟡 Fix Soon |
| D6 | Duplicate dependencies | npm ls --all --json 2>/dev/null | grep -c '"deduped"' | ℹ️ Info |
D5 — Lockfile freshness check:
# package.json changed more recently than lockfile?
LOCK_DATE=$(git log -1 --format=%ct -- package-lock.json 2>/dev/null || echo 0)
PKG_DATE=$(git log -1 --format=%ct -- package.json 2>/dev/null || echo 0)
if [ "$PKG_DATE" -gt "$LOCK_DATE" ]; then
echo "⚠️ package.json modified after lockfile — run npm install"
fiHow to fix:
- D1:
npm audit fixfor compatible fixes;npm audit fix --forcefor breaking (review changes). For stubborn advisories: check if the vuln is reachable, or override inpackage.jsonoverrides. - D2:
npm updatefor minor/patch;npm install <pkg>@latestfor major (check changelogs). - D3:
npm uninstall <pkg>for each unused dep. - D4:
npm install <pkg>for each missing dep. - D5:
npm installto regenerate lockfile, commit it. - D6:
npm dedupethen verify tests pass.
Python (uv / pip)
| # | Check | Command | Severity |
| D1 | Known vulnerabilities | pip-audit --format=json | 🔴 Fix Now |
| D2 | Outdated dependencies | uv pip list --outdated or pip list --outdated --format=json | 🟡 Fix Soon |
| D3 | Unused dependencies | deptry . --json (if available) | 🟡 Fix Soon |
| D5 | Lockfile freshness | Compare uv.lock vs pyproject.toml timestamps | 🟡 Fix Soon |
How to fix:
- D1:
uv pip install --upgrade <pkg>for each vulnerable package. Check advisories for minimum safe version. - D2:
uv pip install --upgrade <pkg>per package, oruv lock --upgradefor all. - D3: Remove from
[project.dependencies]inpyproject.toml, thenuv sync. - D5:
uv lock && uv sync.
Go
| # | Check | Command | Severity |
| D1 | Known vulnerabilities | govulncheck ./... | 🔴 Fix Now |
| D2 | Outdated dependencies | go list -m -u all | 🟡 Fix Soon |
| D3 | Unused dependencies | go mod tidy -v (reports removed) | 🟡 Fix Soon |
How to fix:
- D1:
go get <module>@latestfor vulnerable deps, thengo mod tidy. - D2:
go get -u ./...for all, orgo get <module>@latestselectively. - D3:
go mod tidyremoves unused; commitgo.modandgo.sum.
Step 2: Git Hygiene
| # | Check | Command | Severity |
| G1 | Stale local branches (merged) | git branch --merged main | grep -v '^\*|main|develop' | 🟡 Fix Soon |
| G2 | Stale remote branches (merged) | git branch -r --merged origin/main | grep -v 'HEAD|main|develop' | 🟡 Fix Soon |
| G3 | Large files in repo | See below | 🟡 Fix Soon (🔴 if >10MB) |
| G4 | .gitignore completeness | See below | 🟡 Fix Soon |
| G5 | Untracked files that should be ignored | git status --porcelain | grep '^??' — look for build artifacts, IDE files, env files | ℹ️ Info |
| G6 | Uncommitted changes | git status --porcelain | ℹ️ Info |
G3 — Large files check:
# Top 10 largest tracked files
git ls-files -z | xargs -0 -I{} git log --diff-filter=A --format='%H' -1 -- '{}' | head -20
# Simpler: just check current tree
git ls-files -z | xargs -0 du -sh 2>/dev/null | sort -rh | head -10G4 — .gitignore completeness:
Must include (per stack):
- Universal:
.env,.env.*,*.local,.DS_Store,Thumbs.db,*.swp,.idea/,.vscode/(or be deliberate about tracking it) - Node:
node_modules/,dist/,build/,coverage/,.turbo/,.next/ - Python:
__pycache__/,*.pyc,.venv/,venv/,.mypy_cache/,.pytest_cache/,*.egg-info/ - Go: binary name (check
go build -o),vendor/(if not vendoring)
How to fix:
- G1:
git branch -d <branch>for each merged local branch. - G2:
git push origin --delete <branch>for each merged remote branch. Be careful — confirm with team. - G3: For files that shouldn't be tracked: add to
.gitignore,git rm --cached <file>. For files already in history:git filter-repoor BFG Repo-Cleaner (destructive — confirm first). - G4: Add missing patterns to
.gitignore. Use a generator like gitignore.io as a starting point. - G5: Either add to
.gitignoreorgit addif they should be tracked.
Step 3: CI/CD Health
Skip if no CI configuration found.
| # | Check | Command | Severity |
| C1 | Workflow files exist | ls .github/workflows/*.yml 2>/dev/null | ℹ️ Info |
| C2 | Actions pinned by SHA | grep -rE 'uses: [^@]+@v[0-9]' .github/workflows/ — should return nothing | 🟡 Fix Soon |
| C3 | Least-privilege permissions | Scan for permissions: blocks; flag write-all or missing job-level perms | 🟡 Fix Soon |
| C4 | No secret leaks in workflows | Check for echo ${{ secrets.* }}, secret in $GITHUB_OUTPUT/$GITHUB_ENV | 🔴 Fix Now |
| C5 | Deprecated actions | Check for known deprecated: actions/create-release@v1, set-output commands, ::set-env | 🟡 Fix Soon |
| C6 | Node/Python version matches project | Compare workflow matrix with engines, .nvmrc, pyproject.toml [requires-python] | 🟡 Fix Soon |
How to fix:
- C2: Replace
uses: actions/checkout@v4withuses: actions/checkout@<full-sha>. Find SHA:gh api repos/actions/checkout/git/ref/tags/v4 --jq .object.shaor check the releases page. - C3: Add explicit
permissions:at job level. Start withcontents: readand add only what's needed. - C4: Remove secret interpolation. Use
environment:blocks or write to files with masking. - C5: Replace deprecated actions with current equivalents.
set-output→$GITHUB_OUTPUTfile. - C6: Align versions. Use
.nvmrcorenginesas the source of truth.
Step 4: Code Quality Drift
| # | Check | Command | Severity |
| Q1 | TODO/FIXME/HACK count | git grep -ciE '(TODO|FIXME|HACK)' -- '*.ts' '*.js' '*.py' '*.go' ':!node_modules' ':!vendor' ':!.venv' | ℹ️ Info (🟡 if >20) |
| Q2 | console.log in src (JS/TS) | git grep -c 'console\.log' -- 'src/**/*.ts' 'src/**/*.js' ':!*.test.*' ':!*.spec.*' | 🟡 Fix Soon |
| Q3 | Disabled/skipped tests | git grep -cE '(it\.skip|test\.skip|describe\.skip|xit|xdescribe|@pytest\.mark\.skip|t\.Skip)' -- '*.test.*' '*.spec.*' '*_test.*' '*_test.go' | 🟡 Fix Soon |
| Q4 | Lint passes | npm run lint / ruff check . / golangci-lint run | 🟡 Fix Soon |
| Q5 | Tests pass | npm test / pytest / go test ./... | 🔴 Fix Now |
| Q6 | Build succeeds | npm run build / uv build / go build ./... | 🔴 Fix Now |
| Q7 | Type errors (TS) | npx tsc --noEmit | 🟡 Fix Soon |
| Q8 | Dead exports (TS) | npx ts-prune 2>/dev/null | grep -v '(used in module)' | ℹ️ Info |
How to fix:
- Q1: Triage each TODO — either do it, create an issue/task for it, or remove it if obsolete.
- Q2: Replace with a proper logger, or remove debug logging.
grep -rn 'console.log' src/to find them. - Q3: Either fix the underlying issue and un-skip, or delete the test if the feature was removed.
- Q4–Q7: Fix the errors. Run the tool, address each issue.
- Q8: Remove unused exports, or add
// ts-prune-ignore-nextif they're part of the public API.
Step 5: Documentation Freshness
| # | Check | Command | Severity |
| F1 | README.md exists | File check | 🔴 Fix Now |
| F2 | README freshness vs. source | Compare git log -1 --format=%cr -- README.md vs git log -1 --format=%cr -- src/ | 🟡 if src is >30 days newer |
| F3 | CHANGELOG exists | File check | 🟡 Fix Soon (for published packages) |
| F4 | Broken internal links | See below | 🟡 Fix Soon |
| F5 | LICENSE file present | File check | 🔴 Fix Now |
| F6 | LICENSE matches package metadata | Compare LICENSE text with package.json license / pyproject.toml license | 🟡 Fix Soon |
| F7 | AGENTS.md references valid paths | If .pi/AGENTS.md exists, check that referenced files/dirs exist | 🟡 Fix Soon |
F4 — Broken link check:
# Find markdown links and verify targets exist
grep -roE '\[([^]]+)\]\(([^)]+)\)' *.md docs/**/*.md 2>/dev/null | \
grep -v 'http' | \
while IFS= read -r line; do
# Extract path from markdown link
path=$(echo "$line" | sed 's/.*](\([^)]*\)).*/\1/' | sed 's/#.*//')
if [ -n "$path" ] && [ ! -e "$path" ]; then
echo "BROKEN: $line"
fi
doneHow to fix:
- F1: Write a README with: what it does, how to install, how to use, prerequisites, license.
- F2: Review README against current code — update examples, API docs, feature lists.
- F3: Add a CHANGELOG.md. Consider
@changesets/clifor automated generation (seepre-releaseskill). - F4: Update or remove broken links.
- F5: Add a LICENSE file. Use choosealicense.com if unsure.
- F6: Make LICENSE file and metadata agree.
- F7: Update AGENTS.md to reflect current project structure.
Step 6: Configuration Consistency
| # | Check | How | Severity |
| X1 | EditorConfig present | .editorconfig exists | ℹ️ Info |
| X2 | Strict mode (TS) | tsconfig.json → "strict": true | 🟡 Fix Soon |
| X3 | Formatter configured | .prettierrc / ruff.toml / gofmt (built-in) | 🟡 Fix Soon |
| X4 | Linter configured | .eslintrc* or eslint.config.* / ruff.toml / golangci-lint config | 🟡 Fix Soon |
| X5 | Engine constraints match CI | package.json engines vs CI matrix; pyproject.toml requires-python vs CI | 🟡 Fix Soon |
| X6 | .nvmrc / .python-version matches | Compare with engines / requires-python / CI config | ℹ️ Info |
How to fix:
- X1: Add
.editorconfig. Minimal:root = true,[*]block withindent_style,indent_size,end_of_line,insert_final_newline. - X2: Set
"strict": trueintsconfig.json. Fix resulting type errors (usually worth it). - X3–X4: Add config files. Use the project's existing style as a baseline.
- X5–X6: Pick one source of truth (recommend
engines/requires-python) and align everything else.
Step 7: Security Posture
Lightweight security checks for ongoing hygiene. For the full pre-release security audit
(gitleaks, trufflehog, workflow audit), use the pre-release skill.
| # | Check | Command | Severity |
| S1 | No tracked .env or .local files | git ls-files '*.env' '*.env.*' '*.local' '*.local.*' '.env' '.env.local' | 🔴 Fix Now |
| S2 | .env.example exists (if .env in .gitignore) | File check | 🟡 Fix Soon |
| S3 | No hardcoded secrets in source | git grep -iE '(api[_-]?key|secret|password|token)\s*[:=]\s*["\x27][^"\x27]{8,}' -- ':!*.lock' ':!node_modules' ':!*.example' ':!*.sample' | 🔴 Fix Now |
| S4 | Secrets scanning config present | .gitleaks.toml or pre-commit hooks | ℹ️ Info |
| S5 | No broad file permissions | Check for chmod 777 or 0777 in scripts | 🔴 Fix Now |
How to fix:
- S1:
git rm --cached <file>, add to.gitignore, commit. If the file contained real secrets, rotate them immediately — they're in git history. - S2: Create
.env.examplewith placeholder values (<REPLACE_ME>) for every var in.env. - S3: Move secrets to env vars or a secrets manager. Replace in code with
process.env.VAR/os.environ["VAR"]. - S4: Add
.gitleaks.toml(even a minimal one enables CI scanning). Or addgitleaksto pre-commit hooks. - S5: Use least-privilege permissions (
644for files,755for executables).
Step 8: Project Metadata
| # | Check | How | Severity |
| M1 | Required package fields | name, version, description, license in package.json / pyproject.toml | 🟡 Fix Soon |
| M2 | Repository URL set | repository field in package metadata | 🟡 Fix Soon |
| M3 | Keywords present | keywords array | ℹ️ Info |
| M4 | FUNDING.yml (public repos) | .github/FUNDING.yml exists | ℹ️ Info |
| M5 | Pi package compliance | If ships skills/extensions: pi-package keyword, pi manifest, files includes skill dirs | 🟡 Fix Soon (if applicable) |
How to fix:
- M1–M3: Add the missing fields to
package.jsonorpyproject.toml. - M4: Create
.github/FUNDING.ymlwithgithub: <username>. - M5: See pi package docs for required fields.
Baseline Tracking
Save a baseline after each run to detect drift over time. Store at .pi/hygiene-baseline.json:
{
"timestamp": "2026-02-14T23:00:00Z",
"stack": ["node"],
"scores": {
"dependencies": { "status": "healthy", "vulns": 0, "outdated": 3, "unused": 0 },
"git": { "status": "healthy", "stale_branches": 0, "large_files": 0 },
"ci": { "status": "warning", "unpinned_actions": 2, "permission_issues": 0 },
"quality": { "status": "healthy", "todos": 5, "skipped_tests": 0, "lint_clean": true },
"docs": { "status": "warning", "readme_stale_days": 45, "broken_links": 1 },
"config": { "status": "healthy", "strict_ts": true, "formatter": true, "linter": true },
"security": { "status": "healthy", "tracked_env": 0, "hardcoded_secrets": 0 },
"metadata": { "status": "healthy", "complete": true }
},
"overall": "7/10"
}On subsequent runs, compare with baseline and flag regressions:
📉 Dependencies: 0 → 3 vulnerabilities (regression since last check)
📈 Quality: 15 → 5 TODOs (improvement!)
→ CI: unchanged — 2 unpinned actions remainWhen the user approves the report, offer to update the baseline.
Report Format
Present the final report as a health scorecard:
# Repo Health: <project-name>
## Score: 7/10 — GOOD
## Stack: Node.js + TypeScript
## Last check: 2026-01-15 (30 days ago) | Baseline: 6/10 📈
### 🔴 Fix Now (2)
| # | Category | Issue | Fix |
|---|----------|-------|-----|
| S1 | Security | `.env.local` tracked in git | `git rm --cached .env.local` |
| D1 | Deps | 2 high-severity npm audit findings | `npm audit fix` |
### 🟡 Fix Soon (4)
| # | Category | Issue | Fix |
|---|----------|-------|-----|
| D2 | Deps | 8 outdated packages (2 major) | `npm outdated` → upgrade |
| C2 | CI | 3 actions not pinned by SHA | Pin to commit SHA |
| F2 | Docs | README 45 days behind source | Review and update |
| Q3 | Quality | 2 skipped tests | Fix or remove |
### 🟢 Healthy (12)
- ✅ Dependencies: no unused, no phantom, lockfile fresh
- ✅ Git: clean tree, no stale branches, no large files
- ✅ Code: lint clean, build passes, tests pass, strict TS
- ✅ Config: EditorConfig, Prettier, ESLint all configured
- ✅ Security: no tracked secrets, .env.example present
- ✅ Metadata: all fields present, license matches
### 📊 Trends (vs. baseline 2026-01-15)
| Category | Then | Now | Trend |
|----------|------|-----|-------|
| Vulnerabilities | 0 | 2 | 📉 |
| Outdated deps | 5 | 8 | 📉 |
| TODOs | 15 | 8 | 📈 |
| Skipped tests | 0 | 2 | 📉 |
### Recommendations
1. **Immediate**: Fix the 2 security/vulnerability items above
2. **This week**: Pin CI actions and update stale README
3. **Ongoing**: Address skipped tests and outdated deps in next sprint
Use your project's task tracking to schedule these items.Scoring
Calculate the score from check results:
| Result | Points deducted |
| Each 🔴 Fix Now | −1.5 |
| Each 🟡 Fix Soon | −0.5 |
| ℹ️ Info | 0 |
Start at 10, apply deductions, floor at 0. Round to nearest integer.
| Score | Label |
| 9–10 | 🟢 EXCELLENT |
| 7–8 | 🟢 GOOD |
| 5–6 | 🟡 FAIR |
| 3–4 | 🟠 NEEDS WORK |
| 0–2 | 🔴 POOR |
Auto-Fix Offers
After presenting the report, offer to fix issues that are safe and mechanical. Always present what will be done and get confirmation before executing.
Safe to offer (low risk, reversible)
- Delete merged local branches (
git branch -d) - Run
npm audit fix(compatible fixes only, not--force) - Run
npm dedupe/go mod tidy - Add missing
.gitignorepatterns - Add
.editorconfigfrom template - Remove
console.logfrom source files - Create
.env.examplefrom.env(with values replaced by<REPLACE_ME>) - Add missing
package.jsonfields (description, repository, keywords) - Create
.github/FUNDING.yml
Offer with warning (confirm carefully)
- Delete merged remote branches (
git push origin --delete) - Run
npm audit fix --force(may have breaking changes) - Major dependency upgrades
- Enable TypeScript strict mode (may produce many errors)
- Update CI action pinning (must verify correct SHAs)
Never auto-fix (explain, let user decide)
- Removing tracked
.envfiles (may need secret rotation) - Rewriting git history (BFG / filter-repo)
- Changing license files
- Modifying CI permissions model
- Removing hardcoded secrets (need to determine replacement strategy)
Tips
- Run early, run often. A monthly cadence catches drift before it compounds.
- Don't try to fix everything at once. Focus on 🔴 items first, batch 🟡 items into a maintenance sprint.
- Baseline tracking is your friend. Even if the score isn't perfect, trending upward means you're winning.
- Pair with pre-release. Run
repo-hygienefor ongoing health,pre-releasewhen you're ready to ship. They complement each other — hygiene keeps the baseline high so pre-release has fewer surprises. - New repos start clean. Run this right after
git initto establish a perfect baseline. It's easier to maintain 10/10 than to recover from 4/10.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

