verify-implementation
Skill16 starsChanged 37 days agoMITView on GitHub
Verify an implementation against its acceptance criteria and the judge rubric, run tests, and emit an APPROVED/CHANGES_REQUIRED/REJECTED verdict — the verification stage (H3).
6 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- BrightGold70/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- MarkTripoli/skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 25, 2026
- HyperAITeam/CLITriggertheir own version, first seen Apr 9, 2026
- codefactory-co/kimoring-ai-skillstheir own version, first seen Mar 17, 2026
- common-creation/skillstheir own version, first seen Mar 13, 2026
- immacualate/claude-forgetheir own version, first seen Feb 24, 2026
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 6
- codefactory-co/kimoring-ai-skills★ 245same name
- HyperAITeam/CLITrigger★ 14same name
- immacualate/claude-forge★ 5same name
- MarkTripoli/skills★ 2same name
- BrightGold70/skills★ 1same name
- common-creation/skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository16 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- analyze-requirementsSkill
- be-fe-security-auditSkill
- commit-deploy-logSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- deploy-to-testSkill
- evidence-bundleSkill
- fanSkill
- fix-and-verifySkill
- impact-reviewSkill
- implement-changeSkill
- qa-gateSkill
- run-affected-testsSkill
- verify-requestSkill
The file
Files
verify-implementation
The verification node of the DAG (review profile). Feeds the hard-gate
(hard-gate.ps1): APPROVED continues, CHANGES_REQUIRED loops back to
implementation (retry counter), REJECTED halts for human intervention (H3/H5).
Pairs reviewer (judges) with tester (actually runs suites) so the verdict
rests on executed tests, not on reading the diff alone.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.