pyo3-binding
Skill1 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Patterns for exposing ProcessFork Rust APIs to Python via pyo3 0.22 and maturin.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- kvcache-formatSkill
- napi-bindingSkill
- rust-patternSkill
- test-harnessSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 21
Place #![allow(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn)] at the top of lib.rs (current approach), with a TODO to revisit on pyo3 ≥0.23.
- Very specific: line 28
Use pyo3-asyncio for async fn exposure.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
pyo3 binding patterns
Module shape
- The cdylib lib name MUST match the Python import name:
[lib] name = "_pf_py"→import _pf_py. - The Python-facing package wraps the cdylib for ergonomics:
crates/pf-py/python/processfork/__init__.pyre-exports. - Use
#[pymodule] fn _pf_py(m: &Bound<'_, PyModule>) -> PyResult<()>signature (pyo3 0.22 bound API). Old&PyModuleis deprecated.
Edition 2024 gotcha
pyo3 0.22's #[pyfunction] macro emits unsafe extraction calls that trip
the unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn lint under edition 2024. Either:
- Place
#![allow(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn)]at the top oflib.rs(current approach), with a TODO to revisit on pyo3 ≥0.23. - Or accept owned
Vec<u8>instead of&[u8](avoids one class of warning but not all).
Async
Use pyo3-asyncio for async fn exposure. Pattern:
#[pyfunction]
fn snapshot<'p>(py: Python<'p>, agent_id: String) -> PyResult<&'p PyAny> {
pyo3_asyncio::tokio::future_into_py(py, async move {
let cid = pf_core::snapshot(&agent_id).await?;
Ok(cid.to_string())
})
}Errors
Wrap pf_core::Error into PyErr via a manual From impl in
pf-py/src/errors.rs. Map Error::Integrity → PyValueError,
Error::Io → PyOSError, etc. Never swallow with a generic RuntimeError.
Type stubs
Hand-write crates/pf-py/python/processfork/_pf_py.pyi so end-users get
type hints. Keep it in sync with the Rust signatures; add a CI check.
Build
maturin develop --release for local dev, maturin build --release for
wheels. crates/pf-py/pyproject.toml declares [tool.maturin]
module-name = "processfork._pf_py".
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

