aif-best-practices
Skill10 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Code quality guidelines and best practices for writing clean, maintainable code. Covers naming, structure, error handling, testing, and code review standards. Use when writing code, reviewing, refactoring, or asking "how should I name this", "best practice for", "clean code".
4 other projects use a version of this, 3 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- letuhao/lore-weaveword for word, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- unxed/f4edited, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- lee-to/ai-factoryedited, first seen Sep 22, 2026
- hightemp/go_computer_use_mcp_serveredited, first seen Mar 21, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- letuhao/lore-weave★ 35100% same
Edited · 3
- lee-to/ai-factory★ 1.2k89% same
- unxed/f4★ 261100% same
- hightemp/go_computer_use_mcp_server★ 2100% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository59 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- site-docs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- web/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- docs/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- web/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- aif-architectureSkill
- aif-build-automationSkill
- aif-ciSkill
- aif-commitSkill
- aif-distillationSkill
- aif-dockerizeSkill
- aif-docsSkill
- aif-evolveSkill
- aif-exploreSkill
- aif-fixSkill
- aif-groundedSkill
- aif-implementSkill
- aif-improveSkill
- aif-loopSkill
- aif-planSkill
- aif-qaSkill
- aif-referenceSkill
- aif-reviewSkill
- aif-roadmapSkill
- aif-rules-checkSkill
- aif-rulesSkill
- aif-security-checklistSkill
- aif-skill-generatorSkill
- aifSkill
- aif-verifySkill
- generate-claudemdSkill
- aif-architectureSkill
- aif-best-practicesSkill
- aif-build-automationSkill
- aif-ciSkill
- aif-commitSkill
- aif-distillationSkill
- aif-dockerizeSkill
- aif-docsSkill
- aif-evolveSkill
- aif-exploreSkill
- aif-fixSkill
- aif-groundedSkill
- aif-implementSkill
- aif-improveSkill
- aif-loopSkill
- aif-planSkill
- aif-qaSkill
- aif-referenceSkill
- aif-reviewSkill
- aif-roadmapSkill
- aif-rules-checkSkill
- aif-rulesSkill
- aif-security-checklistSkill
- aif-skill-generatorSkill
- aifSkill
- aif-verifySkill
- generate-claudemdSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
19 rules. 14 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
14
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 13
Context: If .ai-factory/ARCHITECTURE.md exists, follow its folder structure, dependency rules, and module boundaries alongside these …
- Common: line 21
Treat them as project-level overrides for this skill's general instructions
- Very specific: line 22
When a skill-context rule conflicts with a general rule written in this SKILL.md,
- Very specific: line 24
When there is no conflict, apply both: general rules from SKILL.md + project rules from skill-context
- Common: line 25
Do NOT ignore skill-context rules even if they seem to contradict this skill's defaults — they exist because the project's experience …
- Common: line 29
MUST prioritize X" or "examples MUST follow convention Y" — you MUST comply.
- Common: line 32
Enforcement: After generating any output artifact, verify it against all skill-context rules.
- Common: line 33
If any rule is violated — fix the output before presenting it to the user.
- Common: line 60
Use descriptive names that reveal intent
- Very specific: line 61
Avoid abbreviations (except universally known: id, url, api)
- Very specific: line 81
Test files: *.test.ts or *.spec.ts (consistent)
- Common: line 123
No side effects in pure functions
- Common: line 178
Create specific error classes for domain errors
- Common: line 179
Never swallow exceptions without logging
- Common: line 181
Use error boundaries at system edges
- Common: line 220
Test behavior, not implementation
- Common: line 221
Use factories/fixtures for test data
- Common: line 222
Avoid testing private methods directly
- Common: line 281
Write policy: do not create or modify project artifacts by default.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Best Practices Guide
Universal code quality guidelines applicable to any language or framework.
Context: If .ai-factory/ARCHITECTURE.md exists, follow its folder structure, dependency rules, and module boundaries alongside these guidelines.
Read .ai-factory/skill-context/aif-best-practices/SKILL.md — MANDATORY if the file exists.
This file contains project-specific rules accumulated by $aif-evolve from patches,
codebase conventions, and tech-stack analysis. These rules are tailored to the current project.
How to apply skill-context rules:
- Treat them as project-level overrides for this skill's general instructions
- When a skill-context rule conflicts with a general rule written in this SKILL.md, the skill-context rule wins (more specific context takes priority — same principle as nested CLAUDE.md files)
- When there is no conflict, apply both: general rules from SKILL.md + project rules from skill-context
- Do NOT ignore skill-context rules even if they seem to contradict this skill's defaults — they exist because the project's experience proved the default insufficient
- CRITICAL: skill-context rules apply to ALL outputs of this skill — including the recommendations, examples, and checklists you present. If a skill-context rule says "best practices MUST prioritize X" or "examples MUST follow convention Y" — you MUST comply. Presenting guidance that contradicts skill-context rules is a bug.
Enforcement: After generating any output artifact, verify it against all skill-context rules. If any rule is violated — fix the output before presenting it to the user.
Quick Reference
$aif-best-practices— Full overview$aif-best-practices naming— Naming conventions$aif-best-practices structure— Code organization$aif-best-practices errors— Error handling$aif-best-practices testing— Testing practices$aif-best-practices review— Code review checklist
Naming Conventions
Variables & Functions
✅ Good ❌ Bad
─────────────────────────────────────────────
getUserById(id) getUser(i)
isValidEmail checkEmail
maxRetryCount max
calculateTotalPrice calc
handleSubmit submitRules:
- Use descriptive names that reveal intent
- Avoid abbreviations (except universally known:
id,url,api) - Boolean variables:
is,has,can,shouldprefix - Functions: verb + noun (
fetchUser,validateInput) - Constants: SCREAMING_SNAKE_CASE
- Classes/Types: PascalCase
- Variables/functions: camelCase (JS/TS/PHP) or snake_case (Python/Rust)
Files & Directories
✅ Good ❌ Bad
─────────────────────────────────────────────
user-service.ts userService.ts (inconsistent)
UserRepository.ts user_repository.ts (mixed)
/components/Button/ /Components/button/
/services/auth/ /Services/Auth/Rules:
- One convention per project (kebab-case or PascalCase for files)
- Directories: lowercase with hyphens
- Test files:
*.test.tsor*.spec.ts(consistent) - Index files: only for re-exports, not logic
Code Structure
Function Design
// ✅ Good: Single responsibility, clear inputs/outputs
function calculateDiscount(price: number, discountPercent: number): number {
if (discountPercent < 0 || discountPercent > 100) {
throw new Error('Discount must be between 0 and 100');
}
return price * (1 - discountPercent / 100);
}
// ❌ Bad: Multiple responsibilities, side effects
function processOrder(order) {
validateOrder(order); // validation
order.discount = getDiscount(); // mutation
saveToDatabase(order); // persistence
sendEmail(order.user); // notification
return order;
}// ✅ Good: PHP with type declarations
function calculateDiscount(float $price, float $discountPercent): float
{
if ($discountPercent < 0 || $discountPercent > 100) {
throw new InvalidArgumentException('Discount must be between 0 and 100');
}
return $price * (1 - $discountPercent / 100);
}Rules:
- Single Responsibility: one function = one job
- Max 20-30 lines per function
- Max 3-4 parameters (use object for more)
- No side effects in pure functions
- Early returns for guard clauses
Module Organization
feature/
├── index.ts # Public exports only
├── types.ts # Types and interfaces
├── constants.ts # Constants
├── utils.ts # Pure utility functions
├── hooks.ts # React hooks (if applicable)
├── service.ts # Business logic
└── repository.ts # Data accessRules:
- Group by feature, not by type
- Clear public API via index.ts
- Internal modules prefixed with
_or ininternal/ - Avoid circular dependencies
Error Handling
Do's and Don'ts
// ✅ Good: Specific errors, meaningful messages
class UserNotFoundError extends Error {
constructor(userId: string) {
super(`User not found: ${userId}`);
this.name = 'UserNotFoundError';
}
}
async function getUser(id: string): Promise<User> {
const user = await db.users.find(id);
if (!user) {
throw new UserNotFoundError(id);
}
return user;
}
// ❌ Bad: Generic errors, swallowed exceptions
async function getUser(id) {
try {
return await db.users.find(id);
} catch (e) {
console.log(e); // Swallowed!
return null; // Hides the problem
}
}Rules:
- Create specific error classes for domain errors
- Never swallow exceptions without logging
- Log errors with context (user ID, request ID, etc.)
- Use error boundaries at system edges
- Return Result types for expected failures (optional)
Error Messages
✅ Good: "Failed to create user: email 'test@example.com' already exists"
❌ Bad: "Error occurred"
❌ Bad: "Something went wrong"Testing Practices
Test Structure (AAA Pattern)
describe('calculateDiscount', () => {
it('should apply percentage discount to price', () => {
// Arrange
const price = 100;
const discount = 20;
// Act
const result = calculateDiscount(price, discount);
// Assert
expect(result).toBe(80);
});
it('should throw for invalid discount percentage', () => {
expect(() => calculateDiscount(100, -10)).toThrow();
expect(() => calculateDiscount(100, 150)).toThrow();
});
});Rules:
- One assertion concept per test
- Descriptive test names: "should [expected behavior] when [condition]"
- Test behavior, not implementation
- Use factories/fixtures for test data
- Avoid testing private methods directly
Test Coverage Priorities
1. Critical business logic ████████████ Must have
2. Edge cases and boundaries ████████░░░░ Important
3. Integration points ██████░░░░░░ Important
4. Happy paths ████░░░░░░░░ Basic
5. UI components ██░░░░░░░░░░ OptionalCode Review Checklist
Before Requesting Review
- Self-reviewed the diff
- Tests pass locally
- No debug code (console.log, debugger)
- No commented-out code
- Updated documentation if needed
- Commit messages are clear
Reviewer Checklist
- Correctness: Does it do what it claims?
- Edge cases: What could go wrong?
- Security: Any vulnerabilities? (see
$aif-security-checklist) - Performance: Any obvious bottlenecks?
- Readability: Can I understand it in 5 minutes?
- Tests: Are critical paths covered?
- Consistency: Follows project conventions?
Review Comments
✅ Good feedback:
"This could throw if `user` is null. Consider adding a null check
or using optional chaining: `user?.profile?.name`"
❌ Bad feedback:
"This is wrong"
"I don't like this"
"Why did you do it this way?"Quick Rules Summary
| Area | Rule |
| Naming | Descriptive, consistent, reveals intent |
| Functions | Small, single purpose, no side effects |
| Errors | Specific types, never swallow, log context |
| Tests | AAA pattern, test behavior, descriptive names |
| Reviews | Be specific, suggest solutions, be kind |
Artifact Ownership and Config Policy
- Primary ownership: none. This skill is advisory and reference-only.
- Write policy: do not create or modify project artifacts by default.
- Config policy: config-agnostic by design. Follow repository context,
.ai-factory/ARCHITECTURE.md, and skill-context overrides instead of readingconfig.yaml.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

