structured-brainstorming
Skill2 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub
Structured design process before new features, enhancements, or architectural changes. Brainstorming + plan creation + approval flow.
In this repository27 other files it gives its agents.
- Agent BrowserSkill
- agent-governanceSkill
- agent-system-learning-loopSkill
- agent-system-live-quality-opsSkill
- agent-system-memory-proactivity-opsSkill
- agent-system-output-hygiene-opsSkill
- agent-system-stability-opsSkill
- auto-updaterSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- domaindetailsSkill
- hnSkill
- humanizerSkill
- memory-hygieneSkill
- model-usageSkill
- nano-pdfSkill
- news-aggregator-skillSkill
- orchestrator-loopSkill
- prompt-guardSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- self-improvementSkill
- subagent-executionSkill
- summarizeSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- tavilySkill
- tdd-workflowSkill
- topic-monitorSkill
- verification-gateSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
16 rules. About 0 are common, 15 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈15
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Core principle: Do NOT start implementation without approval.
- Distinctive: line 16
Do NOT write code
- Distinctive: line 17
Do NOT create files
- Distinctive: line 18
Do NOT call implementation skills
- Distinctive: line 19
Do NOT scaffold anything
- Distinctive: line 20
Do NOT make changes via exec
- Distinctive: line 75
Ask questions one at a time -- one question per message
- Distinctive: line 76
Prefer multiple-choice questions when possible, but open-ended is fine
- Distinctive: line 87
After each section, ask "does this look right so far?"
- Distinctive: line 93
Keep it short, clear, actionable
- Distinctive: line 126
Always use full file paths
- Distinctive: line 134
When the plan is complete:
- Very specific: line 151
File operations: Use your framework's read/write/edit tools
- Distinctive: line 153
Task tracking: Use your framework's task management or a markdown file
- Distinctive: line 154
Search: Use your platform's file search and content search tools
- Distinctive: line 158
If you catch yourself thinking:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Structured Brainstorming + Plan Creation
Overview
Turn ideas into mature designs and actionable plans. First understand context, then ask questions one by one, build the design, get approval, write the plan.
Core principle: Do NOT start implementation without approval. Every project goes through this process.
<HARD-GATE>
Until the design is presented and the user gives approval:
- Do NOT write code
- Do NOT create files
- Do NOT call implementation skills
- Do NOT scaffold anything
- Do NOT make changes via execThis rule applies to EVERYTHING, including projects that seem simple.
</HARD-GATE>
Anti-Pattern: "This Is Too Simple for Design"
Every project goes through this process. A config change, a single function, a simple addition -- all of them. "Simple" projects are where unexamined assumptions cause the most damage. The design can be short (a few sentences), but you MUST present it and you MUST get approval.
Checklist
Complete these steps IN ORDER:
- Explore project context -- examine existing files, docs, recent changes
- Ask clarifying questions -- one at a time; understand goals, constraints, success criteria
- Propose 2-3 approaches -- with tradeoffs, including your recommendation
- Present the design -- in sections scaled to complexity, get approval after each section
- Write the design document -- save as
docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md - Move to execution -- create a plan file, hand off to
subagent-executionskill
Process Flow
Explore project context
|
v
Ask clarifying questions (one at a time)
|
v
Propose 2-3 approaches (tradeoffs + recommendation)
|
v
Present design sections
|
v
User approved?
NO --> Revise design --> present again
YES --> continue
|
v
Write design document
|
v
Create plan file (bite-size tasks)
|
v
Hand off to subagent-executionTerminal state: creating the plan file and handing off to subagent-execution. Do not call any other implementation skill.
Process Details
1. Understanding the Idea
- First check the current project state (files, docs, recent commits)
- Ask questions one at a time -- one question per message
- Prefer multiple-choice questions when possible, but open-ended is fine
- Focus: goals, constraints, success criteria
2. Exploring Approaches
- Propose 2-3 different approaches, each with tradeoffs
- Lead with your recommendation and explain why
- Present in a conversational tone
3. Presenting the Design
- Present the design when you believe it is ready to build
- Scale each section to complexity: a few sentences if simple, 200-300 words if nuanced
- After each section, ask "does this look right so far?"
- Cover: architecture, components, data flow, error handling, testing
- Be ready to go back and clarify if something is unclear
4. Design Document
- Save the validated design as
docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md - Keep it short, clear, actionable
5. Plan File Creation (Bite-Size Tasks)
Every task must be independently executable, assuming zero context:
## Task N: [Component Name]
**Files:**
- Create: `full/path/to/file.ts`
- Modify: `full/path/to/existing.ts:123-145`
- Test: `tests/full/path/to/test.ts`
**Step 1: Write a failing test**
[Full test code -- not "add validation", write the code]
**Step 2: Verify the test fails**
Run: `npm test tests/path/to/test.ts`
Expected: FAIL -- "function is not defined"
**Step 3: Write minimal implementation**
[Full implementation code]
**Step 4: Verify the test passes**
Run: `npm test tests/path/to/test.ts`
Expected: PASS
**Step 5: Commit**
`git add ... && git commit -m "feat: ..."`Rules:
- Always use full file paths
- Full code in the plan (not just "add this")
- Full commands with expected output
- DRY, YAGNI, TDD, frequent commits
- YAGNI pruning: if you spot unnecessary features, remove them from the design
6. Execution Handoff
When the plan is complete:
- REQUIRED SKILL: Hand off to
subagent-execution - Fresh session per task, two-stage review
Core Principles
- One question at a time -- do not overwhelm with multiple questions
- Prefer multiple-choice -- easier to answer than open-ended
- YAGNI ruthlessly -- remove unnecessary features from the design
- Explore alternatives -- always present 2-3 approaches before deciding
- Incremental validation -- present, get approval, proceed
- Stay flexible -- if something is unclear, go back and clarify
Platform Adaptation
This skill uses generic tool references. Adapt to your platform:
- File operations: Use your framework's read/write/edit tools
- Subagent spawning: Replace
[spawn subagent]with your platform's mechanism - Task tracking: Use your framework's task management or a markdown file
- Search: Use your platform's file search and content search tools
Red Flags -- STOP
If you catch yourself thinking:
- "Too simple, no design needed" --> SIMPLE = MOST ASSUMPTIONS
- "Let me code first, I will get approval later" --> HARD-GATE VIOLATION
- "I will ask all questions at once" --> ONE QUESTION, ONE MESSAGE
- "One approach is enough" --> AT LEAST 2 ALTERNATIVES
- "I did the design in my head" --> WRITTEN DESIGN + APPROVAL REQUIRED
- "User was in a hurry, I skipped" --> Hurry = MISTAKES, process = SPEED
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

