sdd-audit
Skill198 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Compare implementation against specifications, identify gaps and issues. Use for code review, quality assurance, and verifying spec compliance.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- khangpqvn/SDDADDtheir own version, first seen Sep 29, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- khangpqvn/SDDADD★ 12same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.
- .cursor/rules/sdd-system.mdcCursor rule
- sdd-evolveSkill
- sdd-implementationSkill
- sdd-memorySkill
- sdd-planningSkill
- sdd-researchSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 18
Load specs: Read spec.md → plan.md → tasks.md
- Very specific: line 19
Identify scope: Check todo-list.md for completed work
- Distinctive: line 59
Use the ask question tool if audit criteria are unclear
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
SDD Audit Skill
Compare implementations against specifications and generate structured review reports.
When to Use
- Code review before marking tasks complete
- Quality assurance checks
- Verifying implementation matches spec
Workflow
- Load specs: Read
spec.md→plan.md→tasks.md - Identify scope: Check
todo-list.mdfor completed work - Inspect code: Review implementation for each task
- Gap analysis: Compare spec requirements vs actual code
- Generate report: Structured findings with severity levels
Audit Checklist
Reference references/checklist.md for the complete audit checklist.
Severity Levels
- CRITICAL: Broken functionality, security risk, release blocker
- MAJOR: Logic error, missing feature, significant bug
- MINOR: Style issue, optimization opportunity, cleanup
- OUTDATED: Code correct but spec needs updating
Report Format
## Audit Report: [Feature]
**Status:** Pass | Fail | Warnings
### Quick Stats
- CRITICAL: [N] | MAJOR: [N] | MINOR: [N]
### Review Comments
| ID | Severity | Location | Issue | Recommendation |
### Spec Compliance
| Requirement | Status | Evidence |
### Recommended Actions
1. [Priority action]Integration
- Works with
sdd-verifiersubagent for automated validation - Can trigger
scripts/validate.shfor automated checks - Use the ask question tool if audit criteria are unclear
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

