competitive-analysis
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when conducting structured competitor or alternative solution research with standardized comparison frameworks. Trigger when user says "competitor analysis", "compare X to Y", "alternative solutions", "market comparison", "vs competitor", "替代方案对比", "竞品分析", or when user needs a formal comparison matrix with defined criteria. This is a specialized variant of research-spikes — use research-spikes for general exploration, use this skill when a structured comparison is the primary output.
54 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- miguelclavel/ux-research-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- insight68/Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- AgnesAI-Labs/agnet-skills-cntheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- jaskirat1616/grok-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- codeApe-7/ai-agent-workflowGrouptheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- vijaysuperpositionist/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use usability-test-plan, onboarding-flow and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
launchapp-devSkillusability-test-plan
Design a usability test plan with tasks, success metrics, participant criteria, and facilitation guide. Use when planning moderated or unmoderated usability testing sessions.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Dragoon0xSkillonboarding-flow
Design first-run experiences that create the aha moment fast. Reduces time-to-value by sequencing actions, progressive disclosure, and contextual guidance. Use when building signup flows, product tours, or empty states.
Also in 3 projects that use this
shawnpangSkilllead-scoring
When a founder needs to qualify inbound leads, define their ICP, build a lead scoring model, set MQL criteria, or route prospects through pipeline stages. Activate when the user mentions lead scoring, ICP, MQL, SQL, lead qualification, inbound leads, or pipeline design.
Also in 3 projects that use this
nicepkgSkilluser-research-synthesis
Synthesize qualitative and quantitative user research into structured insights and opportunity areas. Use when analyzing interview notes, survey responses, support tickets, or behavioral data to identify themes, build personas, or prioritize opportunities.
Also in 4 projects that use this
claude-office-skillsSkillemail-marketing
Email marketing automation - campaign creation, sequence building, A/B testing, deliverability optimization, and analytics
Also in 3 projects that use this
AnthropicSkilluser-research
Plan, conduct, and synthesize user research. Trigger with "user research plan", "interview guide", "usability test", "survey design", "research questions", or when the user needs help with any aspect of understanding their users through research.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions54 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 54
- anthropics/financial-services★ 41ksame name
- anthropics/financial-services-plugins★ 41ksame name
- claude-office-skills/skills★ 433same name
- shawnpang/startup-founder-skills★ 331same name
- mverab/eGEOagents★ 218same name
- Fokkyp/claude-skills★ 211same name
- aakashg/pm-claude-code-setup★ 152same name
- nahid-sparktales/agent-dispatcher★ 59same name
- agencia-conversion/agentic-seo-skills★ 51same name
- launchapp-dev/animus-cli★ 39same name
44 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository34 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- acceptance-designSkill
- adversarial-scenariosSkill
- architecture-decisionsSkill
- assumptions-trackingSkill
- consistency-reviewSkill
- copilot-session-retroSkill
- data-api-designSkill
- decision-logSkill
- delivery-planningSkill
- execution-logSkill
- express-incubateSkill
- history-syncSkill
- home-navigationSkill
- implementation-kitSkill
- incubation-discoverySkill
- opencode-session-retroSkill
- operations-planningSkill
- overview-framingSkill
- performance-designSkill
- plain-language-handoffSkill
- project-auditSkill
- project-bootstrapSkill
- prompt-authoringSkill
- quantified-acceptanceSkill
- requirements-specSkill
- research-spikesSkill
- retrospectiveSkill
- risk-registerSkill
- security-designSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- stage-reviewSkill
- test-strategySkill
- ui-designSkill
The file
Files
Competitive Analysis
用于结构化竞品和替代方案对比研究。
When to Use
- 需要系统化对比多个竞品或替代方案
- 需要建立标准对比维度和评分体系
- 选型决策前需要结构化证据
- 用户明确要求"竞品分析报告"
Input
| 来源 | 内容 |
| 用户消息 | 竞品列表、对比维度、选型优先级 |
| 当前项目 | 项目需求、约束条件、成功标准(用于定义对比维度) |
Output Schema
| 文件 | 类型 | 说明 |
wiki/02-research/market-notes.md | 市场笔记 | 竞品对比矩阵、评分表 |
Minimum Viable Output
- 含 ≥3 个竞品或替代方案
- 含 ≥4 个对比维度
- 含每个方案在各维度的定性评估
Complete Output
- 完整的对比矩阵(定量 + 定性)
- 每个维度含权重和评分理由
- 含推荐方案和适用场景
- 含风险和限制
- 含参考资料来源
Dependencies
| 类型 | 说明 |
| 前置 | overview-framing(了解项目定位,用于定义对比维度) |
| 后置 | architecture-decisions(竞品分析结论输入架构选型) |
| 并行 | research-spikes(共享调研方法) |
| 依赖读取 | vision.md(项目定位)、requirements.md(成功标准) |
Procedure
- 确认对比范围和竞品列表
- 定义对比维度(基于项目成功标准和约束)
- 收集每个方案在各维度的信息
- 填写对比矩阵
- 加权评分(如适用)
- 给出推荐和适用场景
- 标注信息来源和置信度
- 增量写入:如果
market-notes.md已存在(由 research-spikes 等创建),读取现有内容,在末尾追加## 结构化对比section,不覆盖已有笔记
与 research-spikes 的区别
| Skill | 关注点 | 输出形式 |
research-spikes | 调研和验证,可以是任意方向 | Spike 记录、研究笔记 |
competitive-analysis | 结构化对比,标准化矩阵 | 对比矩阵、评分表 |
当用户明确要求"对比 A 和 B"或"竞品分析"时,使用本 skill。当用户要求"验证 X 技术可行性"时,使用 research-spikes。
Target Pages
<项目根目录>/wiki/02-research/market-notes.md(主,与 research-spikes 共享)
与 research-spikes 共享 market-notes.md 的协调规则
| 规则 | 说明 |
| 增量写入 | 所有 skill 都增量追加到 market-notes.md,不覆盖已有内容 |
| 章节标识 | competitive-analysis 写入以 ## 结构化对比 为标题的 section |
| research-spikes | 以 ## 竞品笔记 或 ## 调研发现 为标题的 section |
| 冲突处理 | 如发现内容矛盾,标注 ⚠️ 待确认:与 xxx 的结论存在冲突,不直接覆盖 |
Changelog
| 日期 | 变更 | 原因 |
| 2026-04-26 | 新建 skill | 填补 skill 集合中的结构化竞品分析空白,与 research-spikes 形成互补 |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

