mode-interactive
Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
The interactive implementation posture (/foundry:mode-interactive) — the default lean direct loop. The operator drives edit→verify→merge in one accountable context; the operator reviews the diff at the merge button (the Regular-mode segregation). Sibling of mode-autonomous; they differ ONLY at the two ends (who paces, who approves the merge).
- Commits and pushes
In this repository71 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- llms.txtllms.txt
- amendSkill
- auditSkill
- authorize-releaseSkill
- authorizeSkill
- certify-localSkill
- certify-stagingSkill
- coherence-checkSkill
- command-deckSkill
- contextSkill
- cut-releaseSkill
- dashboards-as-codeSkill
- data-tier-cutoverSkill
- decommission-gateSkill
- deploy-statusSkill
- dispatchSkill
- doctorSkill
- drift-sweepSkill
- env-hygieneSkill
- extract-specSkill
- fleetSkill
- grounding-conformanceSkill
- id-applySkill
- id-architectSkill
- id-baselineSkill
- id-discoverSkill
- id-documentSkill
- id-driftSkill
- id-impactSkill
- id-implementSkill
- id-importSkill
- id-planSkill
- id-promoteSkill
- id-reviewSkill
- id-rollbackSkill
- id-simulateSkill
- id-syncSkill
- id-testSkill
- id-validateSkill
- id-verifySkill
- indexSkill
- infra-sandboxed-applySkill
- initSkill
- intakeSkill
- learn-captureSkill
- learn-distillSkill
- merge-when-greenSkill
- mode-autonomousSkill
- modeSkill
- post-upgradeSkill
- releaseSkill
- relockSkill
- report-citation-graphSkill
- reposSkill
- research-captureSkill
- research-firstSkill
- revertSkill
- sd-debugSkill
- sd-discoverSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 15
Default for a single atom / small change.
- Very specific: line 16
Use mode-autonomous instead only for scale fan-out over an authorized release.
- Distinctive: line 22
Run the live-seam walk (real boot + Chrome MCP / real seam) against each frozen checkpoint locator.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/foundry:mode-interactive
The default posture. The lean direct loop: ONE accountable context implements inline, runs the live-seam walk, and the operator reviews the merge diff (Regular mode) — the un-forgeable segregation on single-host. No worker dispatch, no queue; the retro shows this beats the dispatch ceremony for most work.
When to trigger
- Default for a single atom / small change. "implement
<atom>interactively", "/foundry:mode-interactive". - Use
mode-autonomousinstead only for scale fan-out over an authorized release.
Procedure
- Confirm the atom is AUTHORIZED (
/foundry:authorizefirst if not). - Implement inline against the frozen
acceptance-contract.yaml(do not weaken checkpoints). - Run the live-seam walk (real boot + Chrome MCP / real seam) against each frozen checkpoint locator.
- Fast lane for breadth (page-context fetch + SSE tail). For many cases against the same seam, a faster faithful method than one-UI-path-at-a-time: drive the app's API from the browser page context (real cookies/session → the real model + DB seam, not a mocked client) and parse the streamed (SSE) response. Use it to exercise breadth quickly.
- Caveat — conversation independence. Independent single-shot page-context calls behave differently from multi-turn/stateful flows; conversation-state independence must be verified, not assumed.
- The UI walk stays authoritative. The fast lane is for breadth only; the UI walk remains authoritative, especially for stateful/multi-turn flows. Do not substitute the fast lane for the authoritative UI walk on those paths.
- Cut the PR (
gh pr create); the worker cuts its PR, the merge floor decides. - Operator reviews the diff + the floor's check results at the merge — the Regular-mode authority. Merge on PASS.
The load-bearing insight
mode-interactive and mode-autonomous differ ONLY at the two ends — who paces the
loop (operator vs /loop) and who reviews before the merge (operator diff-review vs
a fresh-context pr-reviewer pass — advisory, never the merge approval; the floor's green
checks admit either way). The middle (authorized-spec → implement → certification →
the merge floor) is identical and invariant in both.
Anti-patterns
- Skipping the live-seam walk because "it compiled / unit-tests pass" — status ≠ functional.
- Self-merging in Regular mode — the operator diff-review IS the segregation; do not bypass it even under noninteractive.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

