agentleFS
luiseimanluiseiman/dotforge/skills/learn-project/SKILL.md

learn-project

Skill8 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Scan project code to detect patterns, dependencies, and conventions. Propose domain rules based on what the code actually does.

  • Reads credentials

3 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read whichever exist (skip missing):

    line 13
  2. Very specific:

    If any match found, this project needs the vps-ssh stack.

    line 118
  3. Distinctive:

    Wait for user approval on each before creating files.

    line 157
  4. Very specific:

    Does not read dotforge memory, errors, or agent memory (use /forge domain extract for that)

    line 197
  5. Distinctive:

    Does not modify existing rules (only creates new ones in domain/)

    line 198
  6. Distinctive:

    Does not run any code or install dependencies

    line 199
  7. Distinctive:

    Does not guess — only reports patterns with direct evidence in the codebase

    line 200

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Learn Project

Scan the current project's source code to detect patterns, classify tooling, and propose domain rules. Unlike /forge domain extract (which reads dotforge's internal memory), this skill reads the CODE directly.

Step 1: Detect dependency files

Read whichever exist (skip missing):

  • package.json — extract dependencies + devDependencies keys
  • pyproject.toml — extract [project.dependencies] and [tool.*] sections
  • requirements.txt — read all lines
  • go.mod — extract require block
  • Podfile — read all lines
  • Gemfile — read all lines
  • pom.xml / build.gradle / build.gradle.kts — extract dependency declarations

Collect a flat list of dependency names.

Step 2: Scan imports

Find the top 20 most-imported libraries across the codebase:

# Python
grep -rh "^import \|^from " --include="*.py" . 2>/dev/null | sed 's/import //;s/from //;s/ .*//' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -20

# TypeScript/JavaScript
grep -rh "from ['\"]" --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.js" --include="*.jsx" . 2>/dev/null | sed "s/.*from ['\"]//;s/['\"].*//" | grep -v '^\.' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -20

# Go
grep -rh "\"" --include="*.go" . 2>/dev/null | grep -E '^\s+"' | sed 's/.*"//;s/".*//' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -20

# Swift
grep -rh "^import " --include="*.swift" . 2>/dev/null | sed 's/import //' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -20

Step 3: Scan project structure

# Directory structure (2 levels deep, ignore hidden/vendor)
find . -maxdepth 2 -type d ! -path '*/\.*' ! -path '*/node_modules*' ! -path '*/.venv*' ! -path '*/vendor*' ! -path '*/__pycache__*' | sort

# Config files present
ls -1 .eslintrc* .prettierrc* ruff.toml pyproject.toml tsconfig.json biome.json jest.config* vitest.config* vite.config* webpack.config* Makefile Dockerfile docker-compose* .env.example 2>/dev/null

Step 4: Classify patterns

From Steps 1-3, classify into categories. Only report categories with HIGH CONFIDENCE (direct evidence in code):

ORM/Database:

  • SQLAlchemy (import sqlalchemy, from sqlalchemy)
  • Prisma (@prisma/client)
  • TypeORM (import { Entity } from "typeorm")
  • GORM (gorm.io/gorm)
  • Supabase (@supabase/supabase-js, supabase-py)
  • Raw SQL (psycopg2, pg, mysql2)

Auth:

  • JWT (python-jose, jsonwebtoken, @auth/core)
  • OAuth (authlib, passport, next-auth)
  • Session-based (express-session, flask-session)
  • Supabase Auth (@supabase/auth-helpers)

Test framework:

  • pytest, vitest, jest, mocha, go test, XCTest
  • Detect test directory: tests/, tests/, spec/, test/

Build system:

  • Vite, webpack, esbuild, rollup, turbopack
  • setuptools, poetry, hatch
  • Make (Makefile targets)

API framework:

  • FastAPI, Express, Koa, Fastify, Gin, Echo, Fiber
  • REST vs GraphQL (detect graphql imports/schema files)

State management:

  • Zustand, Redux, MobX, Recoil, Jotai
  • SwiftUI @Observable, @State, @Binding

Deployment:

  • Docker (Dockerfile, docker-compose)
  • Serverless (serverless.yml, sam template)
  • Cloud Run (app.yaml, cloudbuild.yaml)
  • Vercel (vercel.json)
  • VPS/SSH (grep shell scripts and CI for ssh /scp /rsync targeting a host — see Step 4b)

Step 4b: Scan for remote-host usage (SSH/VPS)

Extract remote-host deployment info from shell scripts, Makefiles, and CI:

# Find ssh/scp/rsync invocations in project scripts and CI
grep -rEn "(^|[^a-z])(ssh|scp|rsync) [^|&;]*(@|--[a-z-]+=)" \
  --include="*.sh" --include="Makefile" --include="*.mk" \
  --include="*.yml" --include="*.yaml" --include="*.toml" \
  . 2>/dev/null | head -30

# Also check ~/.ssh/config for host aliases that might match the project
test -f ~/.ssh/config && awk '/^Host /{h=$2} /HostName/{print h" -> "$2}' ~/.ssh/config 2>/dev/null

From the matches, extract:

  • Host (alias from ~/.ssh/config or raw user@host)
  • User (before @)
  • IdentityFile (from ~/.ssh/config or -i flag in the command)
  • Remote path (argument after : in scp/rsync, or inside quoted remote command)
  • Command pattern (what ssh host '...' runs — deploy, restart, health check, log tail)

If any match found, this project needs the vps-ssh stack. Flag it in the proposal and generate .claude/rules/domain/infra.md with the extracted fields. NEVER paste private key content into the rule — only reference the IdentityFile path.

Naming conventions:

# Function naming: snake_case vs camelCase
grep -rh "def [a-z]" --include="*.py" . 2>/dev/null | head -5  # snake_case
grep -rh "function [a-z]" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" . 2>/dev/null | head -5  # camelCase

Step 5: Present proposals

Show detected patterns grouped by category. For each, propose a domain rule:

═══ /forge learn — [project-name] ═══

Detected patterns (high confidence only):

1. ORM: SQLAlchemy 2.x (async sessions detected in 8 files)
   Proposed rule: .claude/rules/domain/orm-patterns.md
   Content: async session lifecycle, model conventions, migration patterns
   → Create? [approve/skip/edit]

2. Auth: Supabase Auth (auth-helpers in 4 files)
   Proposed rule: .claude/rules/domain/auth-flow.md
   Content: session management, RLS policies, token refresh
   → Create? [approve/skip/edit]

3. Testing: vitest (vitest.config.ts found, 23 test files)
   Proposed rule: .claude/rules/domain/testing.md
   Content: test patterns, mock conventions, coverage targets
   → Create? [approve/skip/edit]

4. Naming: snake_case (Python), camelCase (TypeScript)
   Proposed rule: .claude/rules/domain/naming.md
   Content: per-language conventions detected
   → Create? [approve/skip/edit]

Wait for user approval on each before creating files.

Step 6: Generate approved rules

For each approved proposal, create a rule file in .claude/rules/domain/:

---
globs: "<relevant file patterns>"
description: "<what this rule covers>"
domain: "<project-name>"
last_verified: "<today YYYY-MM-DD>"
source: "/forge learn"
---

# <Title>

<Factual observations from the scan — imperative mood, concise>

Rules must be:

  • Under 40 lines
  • Factual (observed in code, not assumed)
  • Actionable (tell Claude what to do, not what exists)
  • English only

Step 7: Report summary

═══ Learn complete ═══
Scanned: <N> dependency files, <N> imports, <N> config files
Detected: <N> patterns across <N> categories
Created: <N> domain rules in .claude/rules/domain/
Skipped: <N> proposals

Tip: run /forge domain extract to capture session-learned knowledge too.

What this skill does NOT do

  • Does not read dotforge memory, errors, or agent memory (use /forge domain extract for that)
  • Does not modify existing rules (only creates new ones in domain/)
  • Does not run any code or install dependencies
  • Does not guess — only reports patterns with direct evidence in the codebase

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.