react-ts-vite
CLAUDE.md1 starsChanged 25 days agoMITView on GitHub
In this repository18 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- docs/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .cursor/rules/rtv-architecture.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/rtv-code-style.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/rtv-design-system.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/rtv-git-workflow.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/rtv-testing.mdcCursor rule
- accessibility-auditSkill
- ci-cd-dockerSkill
- clean-code-reviewSkill
- dependency-upgradeSkill
- deployment-insightsSkill
- project-architectureSkill
- react-componentSkill
- scaffold-featureSkill
- tailwind-design-systemSkill
- testing-vitestSkill
The file
We found no rules to list in this file: it reads as prose or reference rather than instructions.
Files
CLAUDE.md
@AGENTS.md
Claude Code notes
- Skills —
.claude/skills/mirrors.agent/skills/. Edit the source in.agent/, then runnpm run agent:sync(a PostToolUse hook in.claude/settings.jsondoes this automatically when you edit anything under.agent/). Invoke skills with/project-architecture,/react-component,/scaffold-feature,/tailwind-design-system,/testing-vitest,/clean-code-review,/accessibility-audit,/dependency-upgrade,/ci-cd-docker,/deployment-insights. - Workflows —
.claude/commands/*.mdmirror.agent/workflows/; they are step-by-step procedures (/add-page,/add-feature,/switch-architecture,/release,/review-pr,/new-project). - Formatting — Prettier runs after every edit through the hook; never hand-format or argue about style.
- Quality gate —
npm run check(typecheck · lint · format · arch:check · agent:check · tests) is pre-approved in.claude/settings.json. Run it before you report a task as done and fix what it reports instead of disabling rules. - Generated files — never edit
AGENTS.md,.agent/rules/architecture.md,.agent/agent.json,.claude/skills/*,.claude/commands/*,.cursor/rules/*or.github/copilot-instructions.mddirectly.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.