codebase-design
Skill1 starsChanged 8 days agoMITView on GitHub
Design module interfaces and test seams; find deepening opportunities or consult the shared design vocabulary.
194 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- chrysogonus/power-agentstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- wowyuarm/dsh-agent-teamtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Contexera/dsh-agent-teamtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- sgaabdu4/appwrite-backendtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- The-Vibe-Company/quivrtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dhruvsaxena1998/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use setup-ts-deep-modules, decision-mapping and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
liufeng1976Skillsetup-ts-deep-modules
Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.
Also in 43 projects that use this
FabienDehopreSkilldecision-mapping
Turn a loose idea into a sequenced map of investigation tickets, then drive them to resolution one at a time.
Also in 8 projects that use this
RoentekSkillloop-me
Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.
Also in 55 projects that use this
LesaniSkillwriting-beats
Shape an article as a journey of beats, choose-your-own-adventure style. The user picks a starting beat from the raw material, you write only that beat, then offer options for where to pivot next, beat by beat, until the article reaches a natural end. Use when the user has raw material and wants to assemble it as a narrative rather than an argument.
Also in 58 projects that use this
AWSSkillto-questionnaire
Turn a decision you can't fully answer into a questionnaire for someone else to fill in.
Also in 90 projects that use this
LesaniSkillwriting-shape
Take a markdown file of raw material and shape it into an article through a conversational session — drafting candidate openings, growing the piece paragraph by paragraph, arguing about format (lists, tables, callouts, quotes) at each step. Use when the user has a pile of notes, fragments, or a rough draft and wants help turning it into something publishable.
Also in 58 projects that use this
- +1 more from Lesani
Other versions194 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 194
- mattpocock/skills★ 309ksame name
- danny-avila/LibreChat★ 47ksame name
- LibreChat-AI/LibreChat★ 47ksame name
- QuivrHQ/quivr★ 40ksame name
- The-Vibe-Company/quivr★ 40ksame name
- windmill-labs/windmill★ 18ksame name
- MODSetter/SurfSense★ 17ksame name
- GreyDGL/PentestGPT★ 16ksame name
- formbricks/formbricks★ 13ksame name
- humanlayer/humanlayer★ 13ksame name
184 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository26 other files it gives its agents.
- code-reviewSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- handoffSkill
- herdrSkill
- implementSkill
- orchestratorSkill
- prototypeSkill
- prSkill
- researchSkill
- retroSkill
- setup-matt-pocock-skillsSkill
- shoppingSkill
- tddSkill
- teachSkill
- ticket-readinessSkill
- to-specSkill
- to-ticketsSkill
- tutorSkill
- wayfinderSkill
- wizardSkill
- writing-for-agentsSkill
- writing-for-humansSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 181 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Use these architecture terms consistently.
- Distinctive: line 37
Deletion test: if deleting a module makes complexity vanish, it was a pass-through.
- Distinctive: line 53
When these terms need a concrete illustration, read EXAMPLES.md for depth diagrams and dependency-injection examples.
- Distinctive: line 55
When deepening a cluster, read DEEPENING.md to classify dependencies, choose adapters, and replace obsolete tests at the new interface.
- Distinctive: line 57
When comparing alternative interfaces for a chosen candidate, read DESIGN-IT-TWICE.md for contrasting designs and a recommendation.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 181 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Codebase Design
Design deep modules: substantial behavior behind a small interface, at a seam
that lets callers and tests exercise that behavior. This is a shared reference,
not a separate interview or implementation workflow. Use the project's
CONTEXT.md for domain names and respect the relevant ADRs.
Vocabulary
Use these architecture terms consistently; avoid substituting component, service, unit, API, signature, or boundary when you mean the concepts below.
- Module: an interface and its implementation, at any scale: function, class, package, or tier-spanning slice.
- Interface: the module's complete caller-facing surface: types, invariants, ordering, error modes, configuration, and performance characteristics. It is broader than a language's interface declaration or public methods.
- Implementation: the code inside a module. This describes substance; adapter describes its role at a seam.
- Depth: behavior exercisable per unit of interface a caller must learn. A deep module hides substantial behavior; a shallow module exposes nearly as much complexity as its implementation. Count leverage, not code lines.
- Seam: a place to alter behavior without editing there; the location of a module's interface. Its placement is a separate design choice from its contents.
- Adapter: a concrete thing satisfying an interface at a seam.
- Leverage: capability gained per unit of interface learned, reused across callers and tests.
- Locality: change, bugs, knowledge, and verification concentrated in one place.
Principles
- Deletion test: if deleting a module makes complexity vanish, it was a pass-through. If complexity spreads across callers, it was earning its keep.
- Depth belongs to the interface. A deep module may contain small encapsulated submodules; callers need not learn their interfaces.
- The interface is the consumer's test surface. Consumer contract tests use the same seam as callers. Tests of an encapsulated submodule's own contract at its own seam are also legitimate. Reject assertions about wiring, field copies, forwarding, defaults, mock echoes, or source text: they describe implementation.
- One adapter is a hypothetical seam; two make a real one. Introduce a port only when concrete variation justifies it, such as production and test adapters.
- Keep the caller's burden small. Reduce methods and parameters, make dependencies explicit, and keep computation results observable. Hide complexity where doing so increases leverage and locality.
Choose the needed reference
- When these terms need a concrete illustration, read EXAMPLES.md for depth diagrams and dependency-injection examples.
- When deepening a cluster, read DEEPENING.md to classify dependencies, choose adapters, and replace obsolete tests at the new interface.
- When comparing alternative interfaces for a chosen candidate, read DESIGN-IT-TWICE.md for contrasting designs and a recommendation.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

