engineering-workflow / rules
Cursor rule0 starsChanged 36 days agoMITView on GitHub
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- .cursor/rules/00-workflow-entry.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/01-first-principles.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/02-ask-before-act.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/04-changelog.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/05-must-complete-mode.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/06-topic-tracing.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/07-dialogue-execute-mode.mdCursor rule
- project-indexSkill
- project-surveySkill
- tts-notifySkill
- version-backupSkill
The file
We found no rules to list in this file: it reads as prose or reference rather than instructions.
Files
目标对接与确认
核心原则
一切工作必须服务于用户的真实目标，而非表面需求。
目标确认流程
1. 接收需求时
- 区分"用户说的"和"用户真正想要的"
- 如果需求模糊，追问具体场景和期望结果
- 如果需求过于具体（直接指定实现方式），追问背后的目的
2. 执行过程中
- 每完成一个阶段，回顾是否仍朝着目标前进
- 发现偏离时立即暂停并与用户对齐
- 遇到阻塞时，提出替代路径而非卡死
3. 交付时
- 对照初始目标检查交付物是否完整
- 指出任何未覆盖的边界情况
- 如果过程中目标发生了演变，明确说明最终状态与初始预期的差异
对接话术模板
需求澄清
我理解你想要实现的是 [X]，最终目的是 [Y]。
确认一下：
1. [关键假设1] 是否正确？
2. [关键假设2] 是否正确？
3. 优先级：[A] 和 [B] 哪个更重要？方向修正
当前进展：已完成 [X]
发现问题：[描述偏离]
建议调整：[新方向]
原因：[为什么新方向更接近目标]禁止行为
- 禁止对模糊需求直接假设并执行
- 禁止在用户不知情的情况下改变实现方向
- 禁止忽略用户的反馈继续原方案
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.