agentleFS
loulanyueloulanyue/awesome-claude-notes/skills/ralphinho-rfc-pipeline/SKILL.md

ralphinho-rfc-pipeline

Skill272 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

RFC-driven multi-agent DAG execution pattern with quality gates, merge queues, and work unit orchestration.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 4 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 4

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  • could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
  1. Common:

    Use this skill when a feature is too large for a single agent pass and must be split into independently verifiable work units.

    line 11
  2. Common:

    Never merge a unit with unresolved dependency failures.

    line 50
  3. Common:

    Always rebase unit branches on latest integration branch.

    line 51
  4. Common:

    If a unit stalls:

    line 56

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Ralphinho RFC Pipeline

Inspired by humanplane style RFC decomposition patterns and multi-unit orchestration workflows.

Use this skill when a feature is too large for a single agent pass and must be split into independently verifiable work units.

Pipeline Stages

  1. RFC intake
  2. DAG decomposition
  3. Unit assignment
  4. Unit implementation
  5. Unit validation
  6. Merge queue and integration
  7. Final system verification

Unit Spec Template

Each work unit should include:

  • id
  • depends_on
  • scope
  • acceptance_tests
  • risk_level
  • rollback_plan

Complexity Tiers

  • Tier 1: isolated file edits, deterministic tests
  • Tier 2: multi-file behavior changes, moderate integration risk
  • Tier 3: schema/auth/perf/security changes

Quality Pipeline per Unit

  1. research
  2. implementation plan
  3. implementation
  4. tests
  5. review
  6. merge-ready report

Merge Queue Rules

  • Never merge a unit with unresolved dependency failures.
  • Always rebase unit branches on latest integration branch.
  • Re-run integration tests after each queued merge.

Recovery

If a unit stalls:

  • evict from active queue
  • snapshot findings
  • regenerate narrowed unit scope
  • retry with updated constraints

Outputs

  • RFC execution log
  • unit scorecards
  • dependency graph snapshot
  • integration risk summary

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.