agentleFS
lost-rob0tlost-rob0t/skills/skills/starintel-local-search/SKILL.md

starintel-local-search

Skill0 starsChanged 15 days agoBSD-3-ClauseView on GitHub

starintel, local-search, jsonl, ndjson, relations, corpus

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Search canonical local DB records and Auto-Dig packets before research, document creation, linking, or remote ingest.

    line 10
  2. Distinctive:

    Run from the Auto-Dig repository root:

    line 24
  3. Very specific:

    Use only the filters needed for the question.

    line 36
  4. Very specific:

    Read the checkout's AGENTS.md, use starintel-spec-version to resolve the active release, and run python3 scripts/schema-release.py check …

    line 40
  5. Distinctive:

    Start with exact entity names, StarIntel IDs, external identifiers, source URLs, or predicates.

    line 41
  6. Distinctive:

    Search without a confidence floor first so contrary or uncertain records remain visible.

    line 42
  7. Very specific:

    Search both db/ and digs/ unless the task explicitly needs --db-only or --packets-only.

    line 50

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

StarIntel local search

Goal

Search canonical local DB records and Auto-Dig packets before research, document creation, linking, or remote ingest.

Requires Python 3.11+, a current StarIntel Auto-Dig checkout, and starintel-spec-version.

Input

A query, identifier, dtype, dataset, predicate, source, or confidence requirement.

Output

Matching canonical documents with stable IDs and optional repository locations.

Command

Run from the Auto-Dig repository root:

python3 scripts/starintel.py search '<terms>' \
  --dtype <dtype> \
  --dataset <dataset-fragment> \
  --predicate <predicate-fragment> \
  --source <source-fragment> \
  --min-confidence 0.8 \
  --with-location

Use only the filters needed for the question. Results are JSONL. --with-location adds path, line, and surface around each document.

Workflow

  1. Read the checkout's AGENTS.md, use starintel-spec-version to resolve the active release, and run python3 scripts/schema-release.py check before interpreting dtype/field semantics. A v0.9.0 schema filename identifies the immutable base family, not necessarily the active release.
  2. Start with exact entity names, StarIntel IDs, external identifiers, source URLs, or predicates.
  3. Search without a confidence floor first so contrary or uncertain records remain visible.
  4. Narrow with --dtype, --dataset, --id, --predicate, or --source.
  5. Preserve result IDs and locations in downstream notes or document proposals.
  6. For link work, use scripts/search-db-links.py search, resolve, and neighbors; those commands prefer normalized DB records and fail on ambiguity.

Rules

  • Resolve version authority before using schema-dependent filters or interpreting stored fields.
  • Search both db/ and digs/ unless the task explicitly needs --db-only or --packets-only.
  • Resolve ambiguous names with identifiers and source evidence; never choose a record merely because it ranked first.
  • A relation match is evidence that a record asserts an edge, not proof that the edge is true.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.