Update Config
Skill8 starsChanged 7 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Safely update Nexo config files with read-before-write merges, schema-aware mapping, and reload/restart awareness.
In this repository38 other files it gives its agents.
- Brave SearchSkill
- BrowserSkill
- CloudflareSkill
- DNS ToolsSkill
- Docker APISkill
- Endpoint CheckSkill
- Fetch URLSkill
- GitHubSkill
- Google OAuthSkill
- GoogleSkill
- GoPlacesSkill
- LoopSkill
- Microsoft Edge TTSSkill
- 1PasswordSkill
- OpenAI WhisperSkill
- OpenStreetMapSkill
- PDF ExtractSkill
- ProxmoxSkill
- RememberSkill
- RSS / AtomSkill
- RTSP SnapshotSkill
- Session LogsSkill
- SimplifySkill
- SkillifySkill
- SpotifySkill
- SSH ExecSkill
- StuckSkill
- SummarizeSkill
- TaskFlowSkill
- Tesseract OCRSkill
- tmuxSkill
- TranslateSkill
- VerifySkill
- Video FramesSkill
- WeatherSkill
- WikipediaSkill
- Wolfram AlphaSkill
- yt-dlpSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 11
Update Nexo configuration intentionally and safely.
- Distinctive: line 39
Prefer this mapping order:
- Distinctive: line 51
If the request cannot be mapped unambiguously, ask the user before writing.
- Very specific: line 62
if hot-reloadable: recommend agent reload (or rely on watcher),
- Distinctive: line 77
Write only the required keys/values.
- Very specific: line 79
Check YAML/shape consistency (for example agent --check-config).
- Distinctive: line 85
Never replace whole config files when a minimal patch is possible.
- Very specific: line 86
Never inline secrets in YAML when ${file:...} or env refs are expected.
- Distinctive: line 87
Never drop existing array entries unless user asked for replacement.
- Distinctive: line 88
Never claim live effect without stating hot-reload vs restart requirement.
- Distinctive: line 89
If validation fails, stop and report corrective action before proceeding.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Update Config
Update Nexo configuration intentionally and safely. Prefer minimal, reversible patches that preserve existing structure and comments.
Use when
- User asks to change runtime behavior through config instead of code.
- You need to edit files under
config/orconfig/plugins/. - You must wire skills/tools/models/bindings with explicit YAML changes.
Do not use when
- The request is a source-code behavior change (edit Rust/TS files instead).
- The target setting cannot be mapped confidently to a known config file.
- The user asks only for one-off runtime commands with no config change needed.
Input contract
request(required): desired behavior change.target_scope(optional):agent|llm|runtime|plugin|mcp|memory|tool_policy|explicit_file.target_file(optional): required whentarget_scope=explicit_file.merge_mode(optional):append_idempotent(default) orreplace.confirm_before_write(optional): defaulttruefor ambiguous or high-impact edits.trigger_reload(optional): defaulttruefor hot-reloadable files.
Mapping rules
Prefer this mapping order:
- Agent-level behavior (
skills,allowed_tools,system_prompt,inbound_bindings,model.model,web_search,link_understanding) ->config/agents.yamlorconfig/agents.d/<agent>.yaml - Provider/auth/retry defaults ->
config/llm.yaml - Reload watcher/migration/runtime knobs ->
config/runtime.yaml - MCP client servers ->
config/mcp.yaml - Plugin instance config ->
config/plugins/<plugin>.yaml - Memory backend/vector knobs ->
config/memory.yaml - Tool policy / gate rules ->
config/tool_policy.yaml
If the request cannot be mapped unambiguously, ask the user before writing.
Hot-reload vs restart
- Usually hot-reloadable:
config/agents.yaml,config/agents.d/**,config/llm.yaml,config/runtime.yaml. - Usually restart-required:
config/plugins/*.yaml,config/mcp.yaml,config/memory.yaml,config/broker.yaml,config/extensions.yaml, plus structural agent changes (id,plugins,workspace,skills_dir).
After writing:
- if hot-reloadable: recommend
agent reload(or rely on watcher), - else: state explicitly that daemon restart is required.
Canonical workflow
- Clarify intent
- Restate the requested behavior in concrete config terms.
- Resolve target file(s)
- Map request -> file path(s) using rules above.
- Read before write
- Load current file content first; never blind-overwrite.
- Prepare minimal merge patch
- Preserve unrelated keys and comments.
- For arrays, default to idempotent append unless user requested replace.
- Apply edit
- Write only the required keys/values.
- Validate
- Check YAML/shape consistency (for example
agent --check-config).
- Check YAML/shape consistency (for example
- Finalize
- Report exact file changes + reload/restart action required.
Guardrails
- Never replace whole config files when a minimal patch is possible.
- Never inline secrets in YAML when
${file:...}or env refs are expected. - Never drop existing array entries unless user asked for replacement.
- Never claim live effect without stating hot-reload vs restart requirement.
- If validation fails, stop and report corrective action before proceeding.
Output format
Always return:
status:applied|proposed|needs_user_input|validation_failedmapped_targets: list of file paths with rationalechanges: concrete key-level mutationsvalidation: checks executed and resultactivation:hot_reloadorrestart_requirednext_action: required unlessstatus=applied
Examples
request="attach verify + stuck skills to agent ana"request="enable web_search tavily for ana binding"request="increase llm retry backoff" target_scope="llm"request="add whatsapp instance for sales bot" target_scope="plugin"
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

