agentleFS
loootailoootai/reverse-engineer/skills/site-teardown/SKILL.md

site-teardown

Skill1 starsChanged 34 days agoMITView on GitHub

Take apart a competitor or prospect website from the outside: pages and structure, positioning, pricing, tech stack, hiring, ads, search footprint and AI answer presence, using public pages and looot jobs with a quoted cap. Use when the user says: teardown this site, what is acme.com running, what is their funnel, what pages do they have, how do they rank, map their site, analyze their landing page, what does their pricing page say.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions1 project uses a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 1

    1. Roentek/Claude_Code_Boilerplate_Framework★ 4same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Not for the product's internals.

    line 14
  2. Very specific:

    Check https://<domain>/robots.txt.

    line 22
  3. Very specific:

    Read the pages with job:web.scrape.markdown, or a plain GET on the free path.

    line 25
  4. Very specific:

    Search footprint. job:google.serp.organic for 3 to 5 terms they should own, and job:google.serp.ai-mode for the buying question.

    line 29
  5. Distinctive:

    Never log in to their product, fill forms or send anything.

    line 58

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Site teardown

Pick the route from the target, start with a summary, drill only where a question is open, and keep observations apart from guesses. This is the go-to-market view of a public website: how it sells.

When to use

  • Understand how a competitor or prospect sells: offer, pricing, funnel, stack, channels.
  • Prepare a pitch, a positioning gap or a "what they do that we do not" list.
  • Not for the product's internals. Use reverse-engineer for that. This skill reads public pages and public data only.

Inputs

  • Domain (required). Optional: one competitor of yours for a side-by-side, a country for search data, a budget cap (default $0.30, use 0 for free reads only).

Procedure

  1. Check https://<domain>/robots.txt. Do not fetch paths it disallows.
  2. Quote. Find each job below with search_catalog or the public catalog, then inspect it (free, needs a sign-in). Add up the maximum costs. Tell the user: "about $0.05 expected, hard cap $0.30" and wait for a yes above $0.10. There is no dry-run call. Inspect is the quote.
  3. Map the site. job:web.site.map on the domain, or the sitemap at https://<domain>/sitemap.xml with a plain GET. Group URLs by path prefix (pricing, customers, blog, docs, changelog, careers, integrations). Group sizes show where they invest. Pick at most 5 pages to read.
  4. Read the pages with job:web.scrape.markdown, or a plain GET on the free path. Extract the headline and promise, who it is for, proof used (logos, numbers, quotes), price points and plan limits, the call to action, and what sits behind a form.
  5. Stack. job:company.technographics. Note analytics, CRM, chat, billing, CMS and ad pixels. A pixel for a channel is evidence they run that channel. Tag it inferred.
  6. Demand signals. job:jobs.company shows where they push (sales, partnerships, data). job:company.enrich gives size.
  7. Paid presence. job:ads.meta.search and job:ads.linkedin.search by brand name. Count active ads, list the angles and landing URLs.
  8. Search footprint. job:google.serp.organic for 3 to 5 terms they should own, and job:google.serp.ai-mode for the buying question. Record who wins and whether the domain is cited.
  9. Assemble. Tag every point observed, inferred or unknown, as in evidence-research. End with what they do well, what is weak, and what you could do differently, each tied to an observation.

Jobs (catalog revision 101897, read 2026-10-11; inspect shows the live price)

StepJobFrom, per call
Site mapjob:web.site.map$0.0025
Page textjob:web.scrape.markdown$0.0002
Stackjob:company.technographics$0
Hiringjob:jobs.company$0.01
Size and industryjob:company.enrich$0.0019
Meta adsjob:ads.meta.search$0.00188
LinkedIn adsjob:ads.linkedin.search$0.00188
Google resultsjob:google.serp.organic$0.0009
AI answerjob:google.serp.ai-mode$0.002
Authorityjob:backlinks.domain.summary$0.024

A typical run is 12 to 15 calls.

Output format

Sections in this order: Snapshot (what they sell, to whom, price), Site map (path groups with counts), Positioning (headline, proof, call to action), Stack, Channels (ads, search, hiring), Gaps and angles, Ledger (claim, tag, run id or URL), Spent. Keep it to two pages.

Failure handling

  • A scrape returns a login wall, empty text or a bot block: say so, mark that page unknown, do not guess its content, and do not try to get around the block. Try fallback once.
  • Empty site map (a single page app): read the home page and its links instead.
  • An ads search finds nothing: write "none found in these libraries", not "no ads".
  • Never log in to their product, fill forms or send anything. Read only.
  • Balance too low: show the top-up link. Never pay for the user.

Example

"Teardown example.com, compare with our pricing." Plan: map, scrape /pricing and /enterprise, technographics, jobs, Meta ads, three search terms. Quote: 13 calls. Result lines look like this:

  • "The pricing page lists 4 plans and the free plan caps blocks." [observed, scrape run r2]
  • "They run a Meta campaign that points at /templates." [observed, ads run r5]
  • "They likely invest in template-led SEO." [inferred from the path group count and the ads]

The names and numbers here are illustrative.

Related

reverse-engineer runs this skill as its phase 2.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.