site-teardown
Skill1 starsChanged 34 days agoMITView on GitHub
Take apart a competitor or prospect website from the outside: pages and structure, positioning, pricing, tech stack, hiring, ads, search footprint and AI answer presence, using public pages and looot jobs with a quoted cap. Use when the user says: teardown this site, what is acme.com running, what is their funnel, what pages do they have, how do they rank, map their site, analyze their landing page, what does their pricing page say.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Roentek/Claude_Code_Boilerplate_Frameworktheir own version, first seen May 5, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- Roentek/Claude_Code_Boilerplate_Framework★ 4same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- llms.txtllms.txt
- bounded-probeSkill
- claims-auditSkill
- competitor-diffSkill
- evidence-researchSkill
- rebuild-on-loootSkill
- request-providerSkill
- reverse-engineerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 14
Not for the product's internals.
- Very specific: line 22
Check https://<domain>/robots.txt.
- Very specific: line 25
Read the pages with job:web.scrape.markdown, or a plain GET on the free path.
- Very specific: line 29
Search footprint. job:google.serp.organic for 3 to 5 terms they should own, and job:google.serp.ai-mode for the buying question.
- Distinctive: line 58
Never log in to their product, fill forms or send anything.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Site teardown
Pick the route from the target, start with a summary, drill only where a question is open, and keep observations apart from guesses. This is the go-to-market view of a public website: how it sells.
When to use
- Understand how a competitor or prospect sells: offer, pricing, funnel, stack, channels.
- Prepare a pitch, a positioning gap or a "what they do that we do not" list.
- Not for the product's internals. Use
reverse-engineerfor that. This skill reads public pages and public data only.
Inputs
- Domain (required). Optional: one competitor of yours for a side-by-side, a country for search data, a budget cap (default $0.30, use 0 for free reads only).
Procedure
- Check
https://<domain>/robots.txt. Do not fetch paths it disallows. - Quote. Find each job below with
search_catalogor the public catalog, theninspectit (free, needs a sign-in). Add up the maximum costs. Tell the user: "about $0.05 expected, hard cap $0.30" and wait for a yes above $0.10. There is no dry-run call. Inspect is the quote. - Map the site.
job:web.site.mapon the domain, or the sitemap athttps://<domain>/sitemap.xmlwith a plain GET. Group URLs by path prefix (pricing, customers, blog, docs, changelog, careers, integrations). Group sizes show where they invest. Pick at most 5 pages to read. - Read the pages with
job:web.scrape.markdown, or a plain GET on the free path. Extract the headline and promise, who it is for, proof used (logos, numbers, quotes), price points and plan limits, the call to action, and what sits behind a form. - Stack.
job:company.technographics. Note analytics, CRM, chat, billing, CMS and ad pixels. A pixel for a channel is evidence they run that channel. Tag it inferred. - Demand signals.
job:jobs.companyshows where they push (sales, partnerships, data).job:company.enrichgives size. - Paid presence.
job:ads.meta.searchandjob:ads.linkedin.searchby brand name. Count active ads, list the angles and landing URLs. - Search footprint.
job:google.serp.organicfor 3 to 5 terms they should own, andjob:google.serp.ai-modefor the buying question. Record who wins and whether the domain is cited. - Assemble. Tag every point observed, inferred or unknown, as in
evidence-research. End with what they do well, what is weak, and what you could do differently, each tied to an observation.
Jobs (catalog revision 101897, read 2026-10-11; inspect shows the live price)
| Step | Job | From, per call |
| Site map | job:web.site.map | $0.0025 |
| Page text | job:web.scrape.markdown | $0.0002 |
| Stack | job:company.technographics | $0 |
| Hiring | job:jobs.company | $0.01 |
| Size and industry | job:company.enrich | $0.0019 |
| Meta ads | job:ads.meta.search | $0.00188 |
| LinkedIn ads | job:ads.linkedin.search | $0.00188 |
| Google results | job:google.serp.organic | $0.0009 |
| AI answer | job:google.serp.ai-mode | $0.002 |
| Authority | job:backlinks.domain.summary | $0.024 |
A typical run is 12 to 15 calls.
Output format
Sections in this order: Snapshot (what they sell, to whom, price), Site map (path groups with counts), Positioning (headline, proof, call to action), Stack, Channels (ads, search, hiring), Gaps and angles, Ledger (claim, tag, run id or URL), Spent. Keep it to two pages.
Failure handling
- A scrape returns a login wall, empty text or a bot block: say so, mark that page unknown, do not guess its content, and do not try to get around the block. Try
fallbackonce. - Empty site map (a single page app): read the home page and its links instead.
- An ads search finds nothing: write "none found in these libraries", not "no ads".
- Never log in to their product, fill forms or send anything. Read only.
- Balance too low: show the top-up link. Never pay for the user.
Example
"Teardown example.com, compare with our pricing." Plan: map, scrape /pricing and /enterprise, technographics, jobs, Meta ads, three search terms. Quote: 13 calls. Result lines look like this:
- "The pricing page lists 4 plans and the free plan caps blocks." [observed, scrape run r2]
- "They run a Meta campaign that points at /templates." [observed, ads run r5]
- "They likely invest in template-led SEO." [inferred from the path group count and the ads]
The names and numbers here are illustrative.
Related
reverse-engineer runs this skill as its phase 2.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

